Draft genome sequence of Lactobacillus rossiae DSM 15814T

Journal of Bacteriology

Volumn 194, Issue 19, 2012, Pages 5460-5461

  Di Cagno, Raffaella ^a   De Angelis, Maria ^a   Cattonaro, Federica ^b   Gobbetti, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

^b C/o Parco Scientifico e Tecnologico L Danieli   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID DERIVATIVE; BACTERIAL DNA; CARBOHYDRATE; MONOSACCHARIDE;

BACTERIAL GENOME; BACTERIAL STRAIN; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DNA METABOLISM; FERMENTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOTYPE; LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS ROSSIAE; NOTE; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

GENOME, BACTERIAL; LACTOBACILLUS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA;

LACTOBACILLUS ROSSIAE;

EID: 84868295909     PISSN: 00219193     EISSN: 10985530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/JB.01248-12     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. Aziz RK, et al. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75.
2. Bairoch A, et al. 2005. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res. 33:D154-D159.
3. Coda R, et al. 2010. Spelt and emmer flours: characterization of the lactic acid bacteria microbiota and selection of mixed starters for bread making. J. Appl. Microbiol. 108:925-935.
4. Corsetti A, et al. 2005. Lactobacillus rossi sp. nov. isolated from wheat sourdough. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55:35- 40.
5. De Angelis M, Gobbetti M. 2012. Lactobacillus spp.: general characteristics, p 78-90. In Fuquay JW, Fox PF, McSweeney PLH (ed), Encyclopedia of dairy sciences, 2nd ed, vol 3. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
6. De Angelis M, et al. 2006. Selection of potential probiotic lactobacilli from pig feces to be used as additives in pelleted feeding. Res. Microbiol. 157:792- 801.
7. Di Cagno R, et al. 2007. Genotypic and phenotypic diversity of Lactobacillus rossiae strains isolated from sourdough. J. Appl. Microbiol. 10:821- 835.
8. Di Cagno R, et al. 2009. Different fecal microbiotas and volatile organic compounds in treated and untreated children with celiac disease. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:3963-3971.
9. Di Cagno R, et al. 2010. Taxonomic structure of the yeasts and lactic acid bacteria microbiota of pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.) and use of autochthonous starters for minimally processing. Food Microbiol. 27: 381-389.
10. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. 2004. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:D277- D280.
11. Minervini F, et al. 2010. Robustness of Lactobacillus plantarum starters during daily propagation of wheat flour sourdough type I. Food Microbiol. 27:897-908.
12. Rizzello CG, Nionelli L, Coda R, De Angelis M, Gobbetti M. 2010. Effect of sourdough fermentation on stabilisation, and chemical and nutritional characteristics of wheat germ. Food Chem. 119:1079 -1089.
13. Scheirlinck I, et al. 2009. Polyphasic taxonomic characterization of Lactobacillus rossiae isolates from Belgian and Italian sourdoughs reveals intraspecific heterogeneity. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 32:151-156.
14. Siragusa S, et al. 2009. Taxonomic structure and monitoring of the dominant population of lactic acid bacteria during wheat flour sourdough type I propagation using Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis starters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:1099 -1109.
15. Stromeck A, Hu Y, Chen L, Gänzle MG. 2011. Proteolysis and bioconversion of cereal proteins to glutamate and _-aminobutyrate (GABA) in rye malt sourdoughs. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59:1392-1399.
16. Tatusov RL, et al. 2003. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 4:41.
17. Valerio F, et al. 2009. Antifungal activity of strains of lactic acid bacteria isolated from a semolina ecosystem against Penicillium roqueforti, Aspergillus niger and Endomyces fibuliger contaminating bakery products. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 32:438-448.