Performance and preferences: Interactive refinement of machine learning procedures

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2, Issue , 2012, Pages 1578-1584

  Kapoor, Ashish ^a   Lee, Bongshin ^a   Tan, Desney ^a   Horvitz, Eric ^a  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION MODELS; CONFUSION MATRICES; DECISION BOUNDARY; INTERACTIVE REFINEMENT; KERNEL CLASSIFIERS; LEARNING PROCEDURES; LEAVE ONE OUT; MODEL SPACES; MULTI-ATTRIBUTES; MULTI-CLASS; PROBLEM-SOLVING PROCEDURES;

REAL TIME CONTROL;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84868291810     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Ankerst, M., Elsen, C., Ester, M. and Kriegel, H. P. 1999. Visual classification: an interactive approach to decision tree construction. KDD.
2. Bach, F., Heckerman, D. and Horvitz, E. 2006. Considering cost asymmetry in learning classifiers. Journal of Machine Learning Research (7).
3. Becker, B., Kohavi, R. and Sommerfield, D. 2001. Visualizing the simple Bayesian classifier. Information Visualization in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Eds. Fayyad et al.
4. Bekkerman, R., Raghavan, H., Allan, J. and Eguchi, K. 2007. Interactive clustering of text collections According to a User Specified Criterion. IJCAI.
5. Bilenko, M., Basu, S. and Mooney, R. J. 2004. Integrating constraints and metric learning in semi supervised clustering. ICML.
6. Caragea, D., Cook, D. and Honavar, V. G. 2001. Gaining Insights into Support Vector Machine Pattern Classifiers using Projection Based Tour Methods. KDD.
7. Cristianini, N., Shawe Taylor, J., Elisseeff, A. and Kandola, J. 2001. On kernel target alignment. NIPS.
8. Dai, J. and Cheng, J. 2008. HMM Editor: a visual editing tool for profile hidden Markov models. BMC Genomics 9.
9. Evgeniou, T., Pontil, M. and Elisseeff, A. 2004. Leave one out error, stability, and generalization of voting combinations of classifiers. Machine Learning 55.
10. Fails, J. A. and Olsen, D. R. J. 2003. Interactive machine learning. IUI.
11. Girolami, M. and Rogers, S. 2005. Hierarchic Bayesian models for kernel learning. ICML.
12. Gold, C., Holub, A. and Sollich, P. 2005. Bayesian approach to feature selection and parameter tuning for Support Vector Machine classifiers. Neural Networks, 18(5 6).
13. Horvitz, E. 1988. Reasoning under varying and uncertain resource constraints. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
14. Horvitz, E. 1999. Principles of Mixed Initiative User Interfaces. CHI.
15. Horvitz, E. 2007. Reflections on Challenges and Promises of Mixed Initiative Interaction, AAAI Magazine 28. pp. 19 22.
16. Kapoor, A., Grauman, K., Urtasun, R. and Darrell, T. 2009. Gaussian processes for object categorization. International Journal of Computer Vision 88(2).
17. Kapoor, A., Lee, B., Tan, D. and Horvitz, E. 2010. Interactive optimization for steering machine classification. CHI.
18. Lanckriet,G., Cristianini, N., El Ghaoui, L., Bartlett, P. and Jordan, M. 2004. Learning the kernel matrix with semi definite programming. Journal of Machine Learning Research (5).
19. MacKay, D. J. 1992. Bayesian interpolation. Neural Computation (4).
20. Minka, T. P. 2001. Expectation propagation for approximate Bayesian inference. UAI.
21. Neal, R. M. 1996. Bayesian learning for neural networks. Lecture Notes in Statistics (118) New York: Springer.
22. Raghavan, H., Madani, O. and Jones, R. 2005. InterActive feature selection. IJCAI.
23. Rasmussen, C. E. and Williams, C. K. I. 2006. Gaussian processes for machine learning. The MIT Press.
24. Talbot, J., Lee, B., Kapoor, A. and Tan, D. 2008. EnsembleMatrix: interactive visualization to support machine learning with multiple classifiers. CHI.
25. Varma, M. and Ray, D. 2007. Learning the discriminative power invariance trade off. ICCV
26. Ware, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Hall, M. and Witten, I. 2001. Interactive machine learning: letting users build classifiers. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 56(3).