A prospective randomised study of minimally invasive midvastus total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty

Knee

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 866-871

  Guy, Stephen P ^b   Farndon, Mark A ^a   Conroy, Jonathon L ^a   Bennett, Caroline ^a   Grainger, Andrew J ^c   London, Nicholas J ^a  

^a HARROGATE AND DISTRICT NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b BRADFORD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Knee arthroplasty; Midvastus; MIS knee

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMARTHROSIS; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDIAL PARAPATELLAR TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; MIDVASTUS TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PATIENT SAFETY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION CARE; SKIN INCISION; SKIN SCAR; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WOUND HEALING IMPAIRMENT;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84868214460     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: 18735800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Whiteside L.A. Mini-incision: occasionally desirable, rarely necessary: the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21(4 Suppl. 1):6-18.
2. Laskin R.S. Mini-incision: occasionally desirable, rarely necessary in opposition. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21(4 Suppl. 1):19-21.
3. Cuckler J.M. The ugly underbelly of the MIS movement: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(4 Suppl. 10):99-101.
4. Rosenberg A.G. The ugly underbelly of the MIS movement: in opposition. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(4 Suppl. 10):102-105.
5. Tria A.J. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: past, present, and future. Am J Orthop 2007, 36(9 Suppl.):6-7.
6. Jackson G., Waldman B.J., Schaftel E.A. Complications following quadriceps-sparing total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2008, 31(6):547.
7. Tanavalee A., Thiengwittayaporn S., Itiravivong P. Results of the 136 consecutive minimally invasive total knee arthroplasties. J Med Assoc Thai 2005, 88(Suppl. 4):74-78.
8. Aglietti P., Baldini A., Giron F., Sensi L. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: is it for everybody?. HSS J 2006, 2(1):22-26.
9. Chen A.F., Alan R.K., Redziniak D.E., Tria A.J. Quadriceps sparing total knee replacement. The initial experience with results at two to four years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88(11):1448-1453.
10. Kolisek F.R., Bonutti P.M., Hozack W.J., Purtil J., Sharkey P.F., Zelicof S.B., Ragland P.S., Kester M., Mont M.A., Rothman R.H. Clinical experience using a minimally invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective randomized study compared to a standard approach. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(1):8-13.
11. Kashyap S.N., Van Ommeren J.W., Shankar S. Minimally invasive surgical technique in total knee arthroplasty: a learning curve. Surg Innov 2009, 16(1):55-62.
12. Bonnuti P.M., Zywiel M.G., Ulrich S.D., McGrath M.S., Mont M.A. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: pitfalls and complications. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2010, 39(10):480-484.
13. Lee M.S., Yim M.C., Wages J.J., Nakasone K.K. Component alignment after minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: results of the first 100 cases performed. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26(6):926-930.
14. Dalury D.F., Dennis D.A. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 440:77-81.
15. Karachalios T., Giotikas D., Roidis N., Poultsides L., Bargiotas K., Malizos K.N. Total knee replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomised clinical and radiological trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90(5):584-591.
16. Yau W.P., Leung A., Liu K.G., Yan C.H., Wong L.S., Chiu K.Y. Errors in the identification of the transepicondylar and anteroposterior axes of the distal femur in total knee replacement using minimally-invasive and conventional approaches: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90(4):520-526.
17. Lin W.P., Lin J., Horng L.C., Chang S.M., Jiang C.C. Quadriceps-sparing, minimal-incision total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(7):1024-1032.
18. Barrack R.L., Barnes C.L., Burnett R.S., Miller D., Clohisy J.C., Maloney W.J. Minimal incision surgery as a risk factor for early failure of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(4):489-498.
19. Laskin R.S., Beksac B., Phongjunakorn A., Pittors K., Davis J., Shim J.C., Pavlov H., Petersen M. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428:74-81.
20. Boerger T.O., Aglietti P., Mondanelli N., Sensi L. Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 440:82-87.
21. Chin P.L., Foo L.S., Yang K.Y., Yeo S.J., Lo N.N. Randomized control trial comparing the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(6):800-806.
22. Huang H.T., Su J.Y., Chang J.K., Wang G.J. The early clinical outcome of minimally invasive quadriceps-sparing total knee arthroplasty: report of a 2-year follow up. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(7):1007-1012.
23. King J., Stamper D.L., Schaad D.C., Leopold S.S. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty. Assessment of the learning curve and the postoperative recuperative period. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89(7):1497-1503.
24. Tashiro Y., Miura H., Matsuda S., Okazaki K., Iwamoto Y. Minimally invasive versus standard approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 463:144-150.
25. Schroer W.C., Diesfeld P.J., Reedy M.E., LeMarr A.R. Mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(1):19-25.
26. Karpman R.R., Smith H.L. Comparison of the early results of minimally invasive vs standard approached to total knee arthroplasty; a prospective, randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(5):681-688.
27. Interventional procedures overview of mini-incision surgery for total knee replacement 2004, National Institute for Clinical Excellence, UK.
28. Mini-incision surgery for total knee replacement 2005, National Institute for Clinical Excellence, UK.
29. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., Scott W.N. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:13-14.
30. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Murray D., Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80(1):63-69.
31. Ewald F.C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:9-12.
32. Bonutti P.M., Mont M.A., McMahon M., Ragland P.S., Kester M. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A(Suppl. 2):26-32.
33. Haas S.B., Cook S., Beksac B. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428:68-73.
34. Berger R.A., Sanders S., Gerlinger T., Della Valle C., Jacobs J.J., Rosenberg A.G. Outpatient total knee arthroplasty with a minimally invasive technique. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(7 Suppl. 3):33-38.
35. Laskin R.S. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the results justify its use. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 440:54-59.
36. Lombardi A.V., Viacava A.J., Berend K.R. Rapid recovery protocols and minimally invasive surgery help achieve high knee flexion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 452:117-122.
37. McAllister C.M., Stepanian J.D. The impact of minimally invasive surgical techniques on early range of motion after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(1):10-18.
38. Varela-Egocheaga J.R., Suárez-Suárez M.A., Fernández-Villán M., González-Sastre V., Varela-Gómez J.R., Rodriguez-Merchán C. Minimally invasive subvastus approach: improving the results of total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468(5):1200-1208.
39. Roidis N.T., Karachalios T.S., Malizos K.N., McPherson E.J. Incision stretching in primary TKA: what is the real length of our approach?. Orthopedics 2007, 30(5):397-398.
40. Katz J.N., Barrett J., Mahomed N.N., Baron J.A., Wright R.J., Losina E. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and the outcomes of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A(9):1909-1916.
41. Kim Y.H., Kim J.S., Kim D.Y. Clinical outcome and rate of complications after primary total knee replacement performed with quadriceps-sparing or standard arthrotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89(4):467-470.
42. Bonutti P.M., Zywiel M.G., Ulrich S.D., Stroh D.A., Seyler T.M., Mont M.A. A comparison of subvastus and midvastus approached in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92(3):575-582.
43. Aglietti P., Baldini A., Sensi L. Quadriceps-sparing versus mini-subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 452:106-111.
44. Kim Y.H., Sohn K.S., Kim J.S. Short-term results of primary total knee arthroplasties performed with a mini-incision or a standard incision. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21(5):712-718.
45. Chalidis B.E., Petsatodis G., Christodoulou A.G., Christoforidis J., Papadopoulos P.P., Pournaras J. Is obesity a contraindication for minimally invasive total knee replacement? A prospective randomized control trial. Obes Surg 2010, 20(12):1633-1641.
46. Lee D.H., Choi J., Nha K.W., Kim H.J., Han S.B. Ni difference in early functional outcomes for mini-midvastus and limited medial parapatellar approaches in navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011, 19(1):66-73.
47. Bonutti P.M., Zywiel M.G., Ulrich S.D., McGrath M.S., Mont M.A. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: pitfalls and complications. Am J Orthop 2010, 39(10):480-484.
48. Niki Y., Mochizuki T., Momohara S., Saito S., Toyama Y., Matsumoto H. Is minimally invasive surgery in total knee arthroplasty really minimally invasive surgery?. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(4):499-504.
49. Schroer W.C., Diesfeld P.J., Reedy M.E., Lemarr A.R. Surgical accuracy with the mini-subvastus total knee arthroplasty a computer tomography scan analysis of postoperative implant alignment. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(4):543-549.
50. Smith TO, King J.J., Hing C.B. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes following minimally invasive to conventional exposure for total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2012, 19(1):1-7.
51. Dalury D.F., Mulliken B.D., Adams M.J., Lewis C., Sauder R.R., Bushey J.A. Early recovery after total knee arthroplasty performed with and without patellar eversion and tibial translation. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91(6):1339-1343.
52. Ritter M.A., Thong A.E., Keating E.M., Faris P.M., Meding J.B., Berend M.E., Pierson J.L., Davis K.E. The effect of femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty on the prevalence of postoperative femoral fractures and on clinical outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(11):2411-2414.