Component Alignment After Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results of the First 100 Cases Performed

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 926-930

  Lee, Matthew S L ^a,b   Yim, Michael C W S ^a,c   Wages, Jennifer J ^a   Nakasone, Cass K ^a  

^a STRAUB CLINIC AND HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Component alignment; Long radiographs; Minimally invasive; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; LEARNING CURVE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGEON; SURGICAL TRAINING; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; BONE MALFORMATION; FEMUR; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PREVALENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84866565801     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Berend M.E., Ritter M.A., Meding J.B., et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428:26.
2. Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Keating E.M., et al. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement: its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 29:153.
3. Lotke P.A., Ecker M.L. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977, 59:77.
4. Sharkey P.F., Hozack W.J., Rothman R.H., et al. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 404:7.
5. Matsuda S., Miura H., Nagamine R., et al. Changes in knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1999, 14:566.
6. Liau J.J., Cheng C.K., Huang C.H., et al. The effect of malalignment on stresses in polyethylene component of total knee prostheses-a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech 2002, 17:140.
7. Dalury D.F., Dennis D.A. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 440:77.
8. Vail T.P. Minimally invasive knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428:51.
9. Bonutti P.M. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty-midvastus approach. Minimally invasive total joint arthroplasty 2004, 139. Springer-Verlag, New York. J.H. Hozack, M. Krisman (Eds.).
10. Laskin R.S., Beksac B., Phongjunakorn A., et al. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428:74.
11. Tenholder M., Clarke H.D., Scuderi G.R. Minimal-incision total knee arthroplasty: the early clinical experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 440:67.
12. Tria A.J., Coon T.M. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 416:185.
13. Haas S.B., Cook S., Beksac B. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428:68.
14. Boerger T.O., Aglietti P., Mondanelli N., et al. Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 440:82.
15. Hood R.W., Vanni M., Insall J.N. The correction of knee alignment in 225 consecutive total condylar knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981, 160:94.
16. Fu F.H., Harner C.D., Vince K.G. Knee surgery 1994, Williams and Wilkins, Maryland.
17. Laskin R.S. Alignment of total knee components. Orthopedics 1984, 7:62.
18. Jeffery R.S., Morse R.W., Denham R.A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991, 73-B:709.
19. Pagnano M.W., Meneghini R.M. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty with an optimized subvastus approach. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:22.
20. Engh G.A., Petersen T.L. Comparative Experience with intramedullary and extramedullary alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1990, 5:1.
21. Lam L.O., Shakespeare D. Varus/valgus alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2003, 10:237.
22. Jeffcote B., Shakespeare D. Varus/valgus alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2003, 10:243.
23. Katz J.N., Barrett J., Mahomed N.N., et al. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and the outcomes of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86:1909.
24. King J., Stampler D.L., Schaad D.C., et al. Minimally-invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty: assessment of the learning curve and the postoperative recuperative period. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:1497.
25. Lonner J.H., Laird M.T., Stuchin S.A. Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, 331:102.
26. Kosilek F.R., Bonutti P.M., Hozack W.J., et al. Clinical experience using a minimally invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective randomized study compared to a standard approach. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:8.
27. Chin P.L., Foo L.S.S., Yang K.Y., et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:800.
28. Tashiro Y., Miura H., Matsuda S., et al. Minimally invasive versus standard approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 463:144.