Extrapair paternity and genetic diversity: The white-throated dipper Cinclus cinclus

Journal of Avian Biology

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 248-257

  Øigarden, Trond ^a   Borge, Thomas ^a,b   Lifjeld, Jan T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b Mole Genetics AS   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXTRA-PAIR COPULATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; PARENTAGE; PASSERINE; PATERNITY; PHYLOGENETICS; POLYMORPHISM;

NORWAY;

AVES; CINCLUS CINCLUS; PASSERIFORMES;

EID: 77954150566     PISSN: 09088857     EISSN: 1600048X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04847.x     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Arnold K E, Owens I P F. Extra-pair paternity and egg dumping in birds: life history, parental care and the risk of retaliation. Proc. R. Soc. B 2002, 269:1263-1269.
2. Bennett P M, Owens I P F. Evolutionary ecology of birds: life histories, mating systems and extinction, - Oxford Univ. Press 2002
3. Bensch S, Price T, Kohn J. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in a Phylloscopus warbler. Mol. Ecol 1997, 6:91-92.
4. Borge T, Webster M T, Andersson G, Sætre G P. Contrasting patterns of polymorphism and divergence on the Z chromosome and autosomes in two Ficedula flycatcher species. Genetics 2005, 171:1861-1873.
5. Dawson D A, Hanotte O, Greig C, Stewart I R K, Burke T. Polymorphic microsatellites in the blue tit Parus caeruleus and their cross-species utility in 20 songbird families. Mol. Ecol 2000, 9:1941-1944.
6. Foerster K, Delhey K, Johnson A, Lifjeld J T, Kempenaers B. Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature 2003, 425:714-717.
7. Fossøy F, Johnsen A, Lifjeld J T. Multiple genetic benefits of female promiscuity in a socially monogamous passerine. Evolution 2008, 62:145-156.
8. Frankham R. Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations? Heredity 1997, 78:311-327.
9. Griffiths R, Double M C, Orr K, Dawson R J G. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol. Ecol 1998, 7:1071-1075.
10. Griffith S C, Owens I P F, Thuman K A. Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol. Ecol 2002, 11:2195-2212.
11. Griffith S C, Stewart I R K, Dawson D A, Owens I P F, Burke T. Contrasting levels of extra-pair paternity in mainland and island populations of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): is there an'island effect'? Biol. J. Linn. Soc 1999, 68:303-316.
12. Henderson I G, Hart P J B, Burke T. Strict monogamy in a semi-colonial passerine: the jackdaw Corvus monedula. J. Avian Biol 2000, 31:177-182.
13. Kalinowski S T, Taper M L, Marshall T C. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol 2007, 16:1099-1106.
14. Kempenaers B. The use of a breeding synchrony index. Ornis Scand 1993, 24:84.
15. Kleven O, Bjerke B A, Lifjeld J T. Genetic monogamy in the common crossbill (Loxia curvirostra). J. Ornithol 2008, 149:651-654.
16. Kleven O, Øigarden T, Foyn B E, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Rudolfsen G, Stokke B G, Lifjeld J T. Low frequency of extrapair paternity in the common redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus). J. Ornithol 2007, 148:373-378.
17. Krokene C, Lifjeld J T. Variation in the frequency of extra-pair paternity in birds: a comparison of an island and a mainland population of blue tits. Behaviour 2000, 137:1317-1330.
18. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief. Bioinform 2004, 5:150-163.
19. Macedo R H, Karubian J, Webster M S. Extrapair paternity and sexual selection in socially monogamous birds: are tropical birds different? Auk 2008, 125:769-777.
20. Mauck R A, Marschall E A, Parker P G. Adult survival and imperfect assessment of parentage: effects on male parenting decisions. Am. Nat 1999, 154:99-109.
21. Mays H L, Hill G E. Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends Ecol. Evol 2004, 19:554-559.
22. Neff B D, Pitcher T E. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol. Ecol 2005, 14:19-38.
23. Nei M. Molecular evolutionary genetics 1987, Columbia Univ. Press
24. Nybø S, Jerstad K. Fossekallen; hva vet vi om virkninger av sur nedbør, kalking og miljøgifter? 1997, Direktoratet for naturforvaltning, in Norwegian
25. Petren K. Microsatellite primers from Geospiza fortis and cross-species amplification in Darwin's finches. Mol. Ecol 1998, 7:1782-1784.
26. Petrie M, Kempenaers B. Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. Trends Ecol. Evol 1998, 13:52-58.
27. Petrie M, Doums C, Møller A P. The degree of extra-pair paternity increases with genetic variability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95:9390-9395.
28. Primmer C R, Møller A P, Ellegren H. A wide-range survey of cross-species microsatellite amplification in birds. Mol. Ecol 1996, 5:365-378.
29. Richardson D S, Jury F L, Dawson D A, Salgueiro P, Komdeur J, Burke T. Fifty seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis) microsatellite loci polymorphic in Sylviidae species and their cross-species amplification in other passerine birds. Mol. Ecol 2000, 9:2226-2231.
30. Rohlf F J, Sokal R R. Statistical tables 1981, (2nd ed.), Freeman
31. Rozas J, Rozas R. DnaSP ver. 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics 1999, 15:174-175.
32. Seutin G, White B N, Boag P T. Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Can. J. Zool 1991, 69:82-90.
33. Spottiswoode C, Møller A P. Extrapair paternity, migration, and breeding synchrony in birds. Behav. Ecol 2004, 15:41-57.
34. Stapleton M K, Kleven O, Lifjeld J T, Robertson R J. Female tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) increase offspring heterozygosity through extrapair mating. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 2007, 61:1725-1733.
35. Suter S M, Keiser M, Feignoux R, Meyer D R. Reed bunting females increase fitness through extra-pair mating with genetically dissimilar males. Proc. R. Soc. B 2007, 274:2865-2871.
36. Svenson L. Identification guide to European passerines 1992, Stockholm, 1992
37. Sæther B E, Tufto J, Engen S, Jerstad K, Rostad O W, Skåtan J E. Population dynamical consequences of climate change for a small temperate songbird. Science 2000, 287:854-856.
38. Tyler S, Ormerod S. The dippers 1994, T & A D Poyser
39. Väli Ü, Einarsson A, Waits L, Ellegren H. To what extent do microsatellite markers reflect genome-wide genetic diversity in natural populations? Mol. Ecol 2008, 17:3808-3817.
40. Watterson G A. Number of segregating sites in genetic models without recombination. Theor. Pop. Biol 1975, 7:256-276.
41. Westneat D F, Stewart I R K. Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates, and conflict. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst 2003, 34:365-396.
42. Whittingham L A, Dunn P O. Offspring sex ratios in tree swallows: females in better condition produce more sons. Mol. Ecol 2000, 9:1123-1129.
43. Bensch S, Price T, Kohn J. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in a Phylloscopus warbler. Mol. Ecol 1997, 6:91-92.
44. Cabe P R, Marshall K E. Microsatellite loci from the house wren (Troglodytes aedon). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2001, 1:155-156.
45. Crossman C. Single-locus DNA profiling in tree swallows, Tachycineta bicolor: a comparison of metods 1996, Queen's Univ., Kingston
46. Dawson D A, Hanotte O, Greig C, Stewart I R K, Burke T. Polymorphic microsatellites in the blue tit Parus caeruleus and their cross-species utility in 20 songbird families. Mol. Ecol 2000, 9:1941-1944.
47. Double M C, Dawson D, Burke T, Cockburn A. Finding the fathers in the least faithful bird: a microsatellite-based genotyping system for the superb fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus. Mol. Ecol 1997, 6:691-693.
48. Fridolfsson A K, Gyllensten U B, Jakobsson S. Microsatellite markers for paternity testing in the willow warbler Phylloscopus trochilus: high frequency of extra-pair young in an island population. Hereditas 1997, 126:127-132.
49. Gibbs M, Dawson D A, Mccamley C, Wardle A F, Armour J A L, Burke T. Chicken microsatellite markers isolated from libraries enriched for simple tandem repeats. Anim. Genet 1997, 28:401-417.
50. Gibbs H L, Tabak L M, Hobson K. Characterization of microsatellite DNA loci for a neotropical migrant songbird, the Swainson's thrush (Catharus ustulatus). Mol. Ecol 1999, 8:1551-1552.
51. Griffith S C, Stewart I R K, Dawson D A, Owens I P F, Burke T. Contrasting levels of extra-pair paternity in mainland and island populations of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): is there an 'island effect'? Biol. J. Linn. Soc 1999, 68:303-316.
52. Hanotte O, Zanon C, Pugh A, Greig C, Dixon A, Burke T. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in a passerine bird - the reed bunting Emberiza schoeniclus. Mol. Ecol 1994, 3:529-530.
53. Hansson B, Bensch S, Hasselquist D, Lillandt B G, Wennerberg L, Von Schantz T. Increase of genetic variation over time in a recently founded population of great reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) revealed by microsatellites and DNA fingerprinting. Mol. Ecol 2000, 9:1529-1538.
54. Hughes C R, Robinson T R. Characterization of microsatellite loci developed for song wrens Cyphorhinus phaeocephalus. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2001, 1:165-167.
55. Li S H, Huang Y J, Brown J L. Isolation of tetranucleotide microsatellites from the Mexican jay Aphelocoma ultramarina. Mol. Ecol 1997, 6:499-501.
56. Martinez J G, Soler J J, Soler M, Møller A P, Burke T. Comparative population structure and gene flow of a brood parasite, the great spotted cuckoo (Clamator glandarius), and its primary host, the magpie (Pica pica). Evolution 1999, 53:269-278.
57. McDonald D B, Potts W K. Cooperative display and relatedness among males in a lek-mating bird. Science 1994, 266:1030-1032.
58. Mundy N I, Woodruff D S. Polymorphic microsatellite markers in the loggerhead shrike Lanius ludovicianus isolated from a library enriched for CA repeats. Mol. Ecol 1996, 5:811-813.
59. Otter K, Ratcliffe L, Michaud D, Boag P T. Do female black-capped chickadees prefer high-ranking males as extra-pair partners? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 1998, 43:25-36.
60. Petren K. Microsatellite primers from Geospiza fortis and cross-species amplification in Darwin's finches. Mol. Ecol 1998, 7:1782-1784.
61. Piertney S B, Marquiss M, Summers R. Characterization of tetranucleotide microsatellite markers in the Scottish crossbill (Loxia scotica). Mol. Ecol 1998, 7:1261-1263.
62. Primmer C R, Møller A P, Ellegren H. Resolving genetic-relationships with microsatellite markers - a parentage testing system for the swallow Hirundo rustica. Mol. Ecol 1995, 4:493-498.
63. Primmer C R, Møller A P, Ellegren H. New microsatellites from the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca and the swallow Hirundo rustica genomes. Hereditas 1996, 124:281-283.
64. Richardson D S, Jury F L, Dawson D A, Salgueiro P, Komdeur J, Burke T. Fifty seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis) microsatellite loci polymorphic in Sylviidae species and their cross-species amplification in other passerine birds. Mol. Ecol 2000, 9:2226-2231.
65. Saito D, Nishiumi I, Nakamura M. Characterization of nine polymorphic microsatellite loci from the alpine accentor Prunella collaris. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2001, 1:258-259.
66. Saladin V, Bonfils D, Binz T, Richner H. Isolation and characterization of 16 microsatellite loci in the great tit Parus major. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2003, 3:520-522.
67. Tarof S A, Ratcliffe L M, Boag P T. Polymorphic microsatellite loci for assigning parentage in least flycatchers (Empidonax minimus). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2001, 1:146-148.
68. Tarof S A, Ratcliffe L M, Boag P T. Polymorphic microsatellite loci for assigning parentage in least flycatchers (Empidonax minimus). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2002, 2:195.
69. Watson C J W, Beheler A A, Rhodes O E. Development of hypervariable microsatellite loci for use in eastern phoebes (Sayornis phoebe) and related Tyrannids. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2002, 2:117-118.
70. Winker K, Glenn T C, Graves G R. Dinucleotide microsatellite loci in a migratory wood warbler (Parulidae: Limnothlypis swainsonii) and amplification among other songbirds. Mol. Ecol 1999, 8:1553-1556.