Laptop computers in the elementary classroom: Authentic instruction with at-risk students;Les ordinateurs portables dans la classe élémentaire: Un enseignement authentique avec des élèves ‘à risque’;Laptopcomputer im Grundschulunterricht: Authentische Anweisung für die Arbeit mit belasteten Schülern;Los ordenadores portatiles en aulas de primaria: Una educación auténtica con alumnos de riesgo

Educational Media International

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 305-321

  Kemker, Kate ^a   Barron, Ann E ^b   Harmes, J Christine ^c  

^a The Florida Department of Education   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^c JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868118743     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09523980701680888     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Apple Learning Interchange. 2004. Building a 21st century learning community: Manatee County, Florida Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://ali.apple.com/ali_sites/ali/exhibits/1000884/
2. Becker, H., 2000. Who's wired and who's not: Children's access to and use of computer technology. The Future of Children, 10(2) Retrieved July 27, 2004, from www.futureofchildren.org/usr_doc/vol10no2Art3.pdf
3. Becker, H. J., Ravitz, J. L., and Wong, Y. T., November 1999. Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computers and software, November, Irvine, CA: University of California at Irvine, Center for Research in Information Technology in Organizations. Report #3. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey
4. Bohn, A., 2006. A framework for understanding Ruby Payne. Rethinking Schools Online, 21(2) Retrieved April 30, 2006, from www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/21_02/fram212.shtml
5. Callison, D., and Lamb, A., 2004. Key words in instruction: Authentic learning. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 21(4) December: 34–39.
6. Cohen, R., June 15 2002. “ Laptops in Bar Harbor get high marks ”. In Bangor Daily News June 15, Retrieved January 19, 2004, from www.state.me.us/mlte/pressroom/articles/061502BDNCONNERSEMERSON.htm
7. Darling-Hammond, L., 1997. The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8. DiBello, L. C., 2005. Are we addressing the digital divide? Issues, access, and real commitment. Childhood Education, 81(4): 239–241.
9. Florida Center for Instructional Technology. 2006. No strings attached Retrieved February 20, 2006, from http://etc.usf.edu/plans/
10. Haberman, M., 1991. Pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73: 290–294.
11. Haycock, K., March 2001. “ Closing the achievement gap ”. In Educational Leadership March, 6–11.
12. Hill, J., Reeves, T. C., and Heidemeier, H., 2000. Ubiquitous computing for teaching, learning, and communicating: Trends, issues and recommendations, Athens, GA: Department of Instructional Technology, College of Education, The University of Georgia.
13. Judge, S., Puckett, K., and Cabuk, B., 2004. Digital equity: New findings from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4): 383–396.
14. LeCompte, M., and Schensul, J., 1999. Designing and conducting ethnographic research, Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
15. Means, B., and Olson, K., 1995. Technology and education reform: technical research report. Volume 1: Findings and conclusions, Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
16. Muir, M., Manchester, B., and Moulton, J., 2005. Special topic: Learning with laptops. Educational Leadership, 62: 1–7. Retrieved January 25, 2006, from www.mcmel.org/MLLS/mlti/Learning_with_Laptops_sum05.pdf
17. Newmann, F. M., 1996. Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18. Newmann, F. M., and Wehlage, G. G., 1993. Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50(7): 8–12. Retrieved May 1, 2007, from http://pdonline.ascd.org/pd_online/diffinstr/el199304_newmann.html
19. Newmann, F. M., and Wehlage, G. G., 1995. Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Education Center.
20. Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M., and Gamoran, A., 1996. Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104(8): 280–312.
21. Newmann, F. M., Secada, W. G., and Wehlage, G. G., 1995. A guide to authentic instruction and assessment: Vision, standards and scoring, Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
22. Nunn, G. D., and Miller, M., 2000. At-risk adolescents perceptions of learning temperaments: Implications for educational intervention. Journal of Instructional Technology, December Retrieved May 7, 2007, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FCG/is_4_27/ai_68998594
23. Padron, Y. N., and Waxman, H. C., 1999. Classroom observations of the five standards of effective teaching in urban classrooms with English language learners. Teaching and Change, 7(1): 79–100.
24. Payne, R. K., 2005. A framework for understanding poverty, Highlands, TX: Aha! Press.
25. Pellino, K. M., 2006. “ The effects of poverty on teaching and learning ”. In Teach-nology Retrieved April 30, 2007, from www.teach-nology.com/tutorials/teaching/poverty/
26. Penuel, W. R., 2006. Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3): 329–348.
27. Renzulli, J. S., Gentry, M., and Reis, S. M., 2004. A time and a place for authentic learning. Educational Leadership, 62(1): 73–77.
28. Ringstaff, C., and Kelley, L., 2002. The learning return on our educational technology investment: A review of findings from research, San Francisco: WestEd.
29. Rockman, S., 2000. A more complex picture: laptop use and impact in the context of changing home and school access Retrieved July 27, 2004, from http://rockman.com/projects/laptop/
30. Ross, S. M., Lowther, D. L., and Morrison, G. R., December 2001. Anytime, anywhere learning: Final evaluation report of the laptop program: Year 2 December, Retrieved January 19, 2001, from http://www.nteq.com/Research/Laptop%20Yr2%20Final%2012-10-01.pdf
31. Schrum, L., and Bracey, B., 2003. “ Empowering all learners: Creating technology rich, student centered curriculum ”. In Toward digital equity: Bridging the divide in education, Edited by: Solomon, G., and Resta, P. E., Boston, MA: Pearson Group.
32. Stevenson, K. R., 1999. Evaluation report—Year 3: Middle school laptop program, Beaufort, SC: Beaufort County School District. laptop project. Retrieved January 18, 2004, from http://www.beaufort.k12.sc.us/district/evalreport3.htm
33. US, Department of Commerce., 1999. Falling through the net: Defining the digital divide, Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Retrieved April 16, 2007, from www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/fttn.pdf
34. US Department of Education. January 2001a. High standards for all students: A report from the National Assessment of Title I on Progress and Challenges Since the 1994 Reauthorization, January, Washington, DC: Planning and Evaluation Service, Office of the Under Secretary, US Department of Education.
35. US Department of Education. July 2001b. The longitudinal evaluation of school change and performance (LESCP) in Title I schools final report Volume 1: Executive summary, July, Washington, DC: Planning and Evaluation Service, Office of the Under Secretary, US Department of Education.
36. Wells, J., Lewis, L., and Greene, B., November 2006. Internet access in US public schools and classrooms: 1994–2005. (NCES 2007-020), November, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
37. Wenglinsky, H., 1998. Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics Educational Testing Policy Information Report. Retrieved July 27, 2004, from ftp://ftp.ets.org/pub/res/technolog.pdf
38. Wenglinsky, H., 2005. Using technology wisely: The keys to success in schools, New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.