Is the general time-reversible model bad for molecular phylogenetics?

Systematic Biology

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1069-1074

  Sumner, Jeremy G ^a   Jarvis, Peter D ^a   Fernández Sánchez, Jesús ^b   Kaine, Bodie T ^a   Woodhams, Michael D ^a   Holland, Barbara R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PHYLOGENY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CLASSIFICATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 84868016042     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/sys042     Document Type: Note

References (36)

1. Baake E., Haeseler A. 1999. Distance measures in terms of substitution processes. Theor. Popul. Biol. 55:166-175.
2. Barry D., Hartigan J.A. 1987. Asynchronous distance between homologous DNA sequences. Biometrics. 43:261-276.
3. Boussau B., Gouy M. 2006. Effcient likelihood computations with nonreversible models of evolution. Syst. Biol. 55:756-768.
4. Chang B.S.W., Campbell D.L. 2000. Bias in phylogenetic reconstruction of vertebrate rhodopsin sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 1220-1231.
5. Chang J.T. 1996. Full reconstruction of Markov models on evolutionary trees: identifability and consistency Math. Biosci. 137(1): 51-73.
6. Davies E.B. 2010. Embeddable Markov matrices. Electron. J. Probab. 15:1474-1486.
7. Felsenstein J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
8. Foster P.G., Jermiin L.S., Hickey D.A. 1997. Nucleotide composition bias affects amino acid content in proteins coded by animal mitochondria. J. Mol. Evol. 44:282-288.
9. Galtier N. 2004. Sampling properties of the bootstrap support in molecular phylogeny: infuence of nonindependence among sites. Syst. Biol. 53:38-46.
10. Galtier N., Gouy M. 1995. Inferring phylogenies from DNA sequences of unequal base compositions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92:11317-11321.
11. Goremykin V.V., Holland B., Hirsch-Ernst K.I., Hellwig F.H. 2005. Analysis of Acorus calamus chloroplast genome and its phylogenetic implications. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1813-1822.
12. Grievink L.S., Penny D., Hendy M.D., Holland B.R. 2010. Phylogenetic tree reconstruction accuracy and model ft when proportions of variable sites change across the tree. Syst. Biol. 59:288-297.
13. Hamady M., Betterton M.D., Knight R. 2006. Using the nucleotide substitution rate matrix to detect horizontal gene transfer. BMC Bioinformatics. 7:476.
14. Hasegawa M., Kishino H., Yano T. 1985. Dating of human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:160174.
15. Herbeck J.T., Degnan PH., Wernegreen JJ. 2005. Nonhomogeneous model of sequence evolution indicates independent origins of primary endosymbionts within the Enterobacteriales (yProteobacteria). Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:520-532.
16. Holland B.R., Spencer H.G., Worthy T.H., Kennedy M. 2010. Identifying cliques of convergent characters: concerted evolution in the cormorants and shags. Syst. Biol. 59:433-445.
17. Ingman M., Kaessmann H., Paabo S., Gyllenstern U. 2000. Mitochondrial genome variation and the origin of modern humans. Nature. 408:708-713.
18. Jermiin L.S., Ho S.Y.W., Ababneh F., Robinson J., Larkum A.W.D. 2004. The biasing effect of compositional heterogeneity on phylogenetic estimates may be underestimated. Syst. Biol. 53:638-643.
19. Jukes T.H., Cantor C.R. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro H. N., editor. Mammalian protein metabolism. New York: Academic Press. p. 21-132.
20. Kimura M. 1981. Estimation of evolutionary distancesbetweenhomologous nucleotide sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78:14541458.
21. Kolaczkowski B., Thornton J.W. 2004. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous. Nature. 431:980-984.
22. Lockhart P, Howe C., Bryant D., Beanland T, Larkum A. 1992. Substitutional bias confounds inference of cyanelle origins from sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 34:153-162.
23. Lockhart PJ., Huson D., Maier U., Fraunholz MJ., Van de Peer Y, Barbrook A.C., Howe C.J., Steel M.A. 2000. How molecules evolve in eubacteria. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:835-838.
24. Lockhart PJ., Steel M.A., Barbrook A.C., Huson D.H., Howe C.J. 1998. A covariotide model describes the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1183-1188.
25. Oscamou M., McDonald D., Yap V.B., Huttley G.A., Lladser M.E., Knight R. 2008. Comparison of methods for estimating the nucleotide substitution matrix. BMC Bioinformatics. 9:511.
26. Ota R., Penny D. 2003. Estimating changes in mutational mechanisms of evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 57:S233-S240.
27. Phillips M.J., Delsuc F., Penny D. 2004. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 1455-1458.
28. Posada D., Crandall K.A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 14:817-818.
29. R Development Core Team 2006. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
30. Rokas A., Williams B.L., King N., Carroll S.B. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature. 425:798-804.
31. Sumner J., Charleston M. 2010. Phylogenetic estimation with partial likelihood tensors. J. Theor. Biol. 262:413-424.
32. Sumner J., Fernández-Sánchez J., Jarvis P. 2012. Lie Markov models. J. Theor. Biol. 298:16-31.
33. Tarrío R., Rodríguez-Trelles F., Ayala F.J. 2001. Shared nucleotide com-position biases among species and their impact on phylogenetic re-constructions of the drosophilidae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1464-1473.
34. Tavaré S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the anal-ysis of DNA sequences. In: Miura R. M., editor. Lectures on math-ematics in the life sciences. Volume 17. Providence (RI):American Mathematical Society. p. 57-86.
35. Yang Z. 1998. Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:568573.
36. Zakon H.H., Lu Y., Zwickl D.J., Hillis D.M. 2006. Sodium channel genes and the evolution of diversity in communication signals of electric fshes: convergent molecular evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103:3675-3680.