Co-constructing what is said in interaction

The Role of Data at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 349-380

  Haugh, Michael ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867954108     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Bach, Kent 2002 Seemingly semantic intuitions. In Meaning and 'Truth: Investigations in Philosophical Semantics, Joseph Campbell, Michael O'Rourke andDavid Shier (eds.), 21-33. New York: SevenBridges Press
2. Bach, Kent 2004 Minding the gap. In 'The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction, Claudia Bianchi (ed.), 27-43. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications
3. Berg, Jonathan 2002 Is semantics still possible? Journal ofPragmatics 34: 349-359
4. Bolden, GalinaB. 2003 Multiple modalities in collaborative turn sequences. Gesture 3: 187212
5. Borg, Emma 2004 Minimal Semantics. Oxford: ClarendonPress
6. Burridge, Kate and Margaret Florey 2002 'Yeah-no he's a good kid': a discourse analysis of yeah-no in Australian English.Australian Journal of Linguistics 22: 149-171
7. Cappelen, Herman and Ernie Lepore 2005 Insensitive Semantics: A Defense ofSemantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell
8. Carston, Robyn 1988 Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, Ruth Kempson (ed.), 155-181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
9. Carston, Robyn 2002 Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell
10. Carston, Robyn 2007 How many pragmatic systems are there? In Saying, Meaning, Refer-ring. Essays on the Philosophy of Frangois Recanati, Maria Jose Frapolli (ed.), 18-48. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
11. Carston, Robyn 2008 Linguistic communication and the semantics/pragmatics distinctions. Synthese 165: 321-345
12. Clark, Herbert H. and Adrian Bangerter 2004 Changing ideas about reference. In Experimental Pragmatics, Ira A. Noveck and Dan Sperber (eds.), 25-49. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
13. Cole, Peter (ed.) 1981 Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press
14. Crotty, Michael 1998 The Foundations of Social Research. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin
15. Ferrara, Kathleen 1992 The interactive achievement of a sentence: joint productions in therapeutic discourse. Discourse Processes 15: 207-228
16. Ford, Cecilia and Sandra A. Thompson 1996 Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and prag-matic resources for the management of turns. In Grammar and Interaction, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel Schegloff and Sandra Thompson (eds.), 134-184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
17. Fox, Barbara A. and Sandra A. Thompson 1990 A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 66: 297-316
18. Geluykens, Ronald 1992 From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction: On Left-Dislocation inEnglish. Amsterdam: JohnBenjamins
19. Gibbs Jr., Raymond and Jessica Moise 1997 Pragmatics in understanding what is said. Cognition 62: 51-74
20. Goddard, Cliff 2006 Ethnopragmatics: a new paradigm. In Ethnopragmatics: Understanding Discourse in Cultural Context, Cliff Goddard (ed.), 1-30. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter
21. Goodwin, Charles 1979 The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, Georg Psathas (ed.), 97-121. NY: Irvington
22. Goodwin, Charles 1995 Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 233-260
23. Grice, H. Paul 1957 Meaning. Philosophical Review 66: 377-388
24. Grice, H. Paul 1969 Utterer's meaning and intention. Philosophical Review 78: 147-177
25. Grice, H. Paul 1975 Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, 'Volume 3. Speech Acts, Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan (eds.), 41-58. New York: Academic Press
26. Grice, H. Paul 1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
27. Haugh, Michael 2007 The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation. Journal ofPragmatics 39: 84-110
28. Haugh, Michael 2008a The place of intention in the interactional achievement of implica-ture. In Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, Istvan Kecskes and Jacob Mey (eds.), 45-85. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
29. Haugh, Michael 2008b Utterance-final conjunctive particles and implicature in Japanese conversation. Pragmatics 18: 425-451
30. Haugh, Michael 2009 Intention(ality) and the conceptualisation of communication in prag-matics. Australian Journal ofLinguistics 29: 91-113
31. Haugh, Michael 2010 Jocular mockery, (disjaffiliation and face. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2106-2119
32. Hayashi, Makoto 1999 Where grammar and interaction meet: a study of co-participant completion in Japanese conversation. Human Studies 22: 475-499
33. Hayashi, Makoto 2003 Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Amsterdam: JohnBenjamins
34. Hayashi, Makoto and Junko Mori 1998 Co-construction in Japanese revisited: we do 'finish each other's sentences'. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 7, Noriko Akatsuka, Hajime Hoji, Shoichi Iwasaki, Sung-Ock Sohn and Susan Strauss (eds.), 77-93. Stanford, CA: CSLI
35. Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa 2004 Shared syntax: the grammar of co-constructions. Journal of Prag-matics 36: 1315-1336
36. Heritage, John 2007 Intersubjectivity and progressivity in person (and place) reference. In Person Reference in Interaction, Nick Enfield and Tanya Stivers (eds.), 255-280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
37. Horn, Laurence 2004 Implicature. In Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence Horn and Gregory Ward (eds.), 3-28. Oxford: Blackwell
38. Hutchby, Ian and Robin Woofitt 2008 ConversationAnalysis (2nd edn). Cambridge: Polity Press
39. Jacoby, Sally and Elinor Ochs 1995 Co-construction: an introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 171-183
40. Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M. 2005 Default Semantics. Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts ofCommunication. Oxford: Oxford University Press
41. Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M. 2008 Psychological explanations in Gricean pragmatics and Frege's legacy. In Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, Istvan Kecskes and Jacob Mey (eds.), 9-44. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter
42. Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M. 2009a Representing Time: An Eassy on Temporality as Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press
43. Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M. 2009b Cancellability and the primary/secondary meaning distinction. Inter-cultural Pragmatics 6: 259-289
44. Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M. 2009c Semantics-pragmatics interface. In The Routledge Pragmatics Encyclopedia, Louise Cummings (ed.), 458-462. London: Routledge
45. Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M. in press Semantics and pragmatics: the boundary issue. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger and Paul Portner (eds.), Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter
46. Jefferson, Gail 2004 Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, Gene Lerner (ed.), 13-23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
47. Jucker, Andreas 2009 Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory. The case of compliments. Journal ofPragmatics 41: 1611-1635
48. Keinpointner, Manfred 2008 The case for core meaning. In Meaning, Intentions and Argumentation, Kepa Korta and Joana Garmendia (eds.), 77-112. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications
49. Kim, Haeyeon 2004 Collaborative turn completion in Korean conversation. Language Research 38: 1281-1316
50. Lerner, Gene 1989 Notes on overlap management in conversation: The case of delayed completion. Western Journal ofCommunication 53: 167-177
51. Lerner, Gene 1991 On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society 20: 441-458
52. Lerner, Gene 1996 On the 'semi-permeable' character of grammatical units in conversation: conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel Schegloff and Sandra Thompson (eds.), 238-276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
53. Lerner, Gene 2004 Collaborative turn sequences. In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, Gene Lerner (ed.), 225-256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
54. Lerner, Gene and Tomoko Takagi 1999 On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: a co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal ofPragmatics 31: 49-75
55. Local, John 2004 On the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completions. In A Figure of Speech. A Festschrift for John Laver, William Hardcastle and Janet Beck (eds.), 263-282. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
56. Lyons, John 1968 Introduction to 'Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
57. Lyons, John 1995 Linguistic Semantics. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press
58. Maynard, Senko K. 1989 Japanese Conversation: Self-Contextualisation through Structure and Interactional Management. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
59. Ono, Tsuyoshi and Sandra A. Thompson 1996 Interaction and syntax in the structure of conversational discourse: collaboration, overlap, and syntactic dissociation. In Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues-An Interdisciplinary Account, Eduard H. Hovy and Donia R. Scott (eds.), 67-96. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
60. Ono, Tsuyoshi and Eri Yoshida 1996 A study of co-construction in Japanese: we don't finish each other's sentences. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 5, Noriko Akatsuka, Shoichi Iwasaki and Susan Strauss (eds.), 115-130. Stanford, CA: CSLI
61. Recanati, Francois 1989 The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language 4: 295-329
62. Recanati, Francois 2001 What is said. Synthese 128: 75-91
63. Recanati, Francois 2004 Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress
64. Rühlemann, Christoph 2007 Conversation in Context. A Corpus-Driven Approach. London: Con-tinuum
65. Sacks, Harvey 1992 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell
66. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff and Gail Jefferson 1974 A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696-735
67. Schegloff, Emanuel 1993 Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 99-128
68. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson 1995 Relevance. Communication and Cognition (2nd edition). Oxford: Blackwell
69. Suzuki, Takashi and Mayumi Usami 2006 Co-constructions in English and Japanese revisited: A quantitative approach to cross-linguistic comparison. In Gengojoohoogaku Ken-kyuu Hookoku 13. Shizen Kaiwa Bunseki e no Gengoshakaishinrin-gaku apuroochi [Working Papers Linguistic Informatics 13. A Social Psychological Approach to Natural Conversation Analysis], Mayumi Usami (ed.), 263-276. Tokyo: The 21st Century COE Program, Tokyo University ofForeign Studies
70. Szabó, Zoltan Gendler 2005 Introduction. In Semantics versus Pragmatics, Zoltan Gendler Szabó (ed.), 1-14. Oxford: ClarendonPress
71. Szczepek, Beatrice 2000a Formal aspects of collaborative productions in English conversation. InLiSt (Interaction and Linguistic Structures) 17
72. Szczepek, Beatrice 2000b Functional aspects of collaborative productions in English conversations. InLiSt (Interaction and Linguistic Structures) 21
73. Thompson, Sandra and Anthony Mulac 1991 The discourse conditions for the use of complementizer that in con-versational English. Journal ofPragmatics 15: 237-251