Shared syntax: The grammar of co-constructions

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1315-1336

  Helasvuo, Marja Liisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Co construction; Compound TCUs; Conversation analysis; Finnish; Sentences in progress; Shared syntax

Indexed keywords

EID: 3442884933     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bruun Kettil 1957. Drinking Behaviour in Small Groups. The Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies 9, Helsinki.
2. Erringer Anu 1996. The functions of demonstrative adjectives semmoinen, tämmöinen and tuommoinen in Finnish conversations. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Colorado, Boulder.
3. Falk Jane 1980. The Duet as a Conversational Process. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
4. Fox Barbara Jasperson Robert 1995. A syntactic exploration of repair in English conversation. In: Davis, Philip W. (Ed.), Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, vol. 102. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 77-134.
5. Fox Barbara Hayashi Makoto Jasperson Robert 1996. Resources and repair: a cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In: Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A., Thompson, Sandra A. (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, vol. 13. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 185-237.
6. Hayashi Makoto 2003. Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Studies in Discourse and Grammar, vol. 12. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
7. Hayashi Makoto Mori Junko 1998. Co-construction in Japanese revisited: we do "finish each other's sentences." In: Akatsuka, N., Hoji, H., Iwasaki, S., Strauss, S. (Eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 7. CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 77-93.
8. Helasvuo Marja-Liisa 2001. Syntax in the Making: The Emergence of Syntactic Units in Finnish Conversation. Studies in Discourse and Grammar, vol. 9. Benjamins, Amsterdam.
9. Helasvuo Marja-Liisa 2003. What can intonation tell us about syntax? In: Ono, Tsuyoshi, Nakayama, Toshihide, Tao, Hongyin (Eds.), Recent Studies in Empirical Approaches to Language. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, vol. 20. University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, pp. 20-34.
10. Helasvuo Marja-Liisa Laakso Minna Sorjonen Marja-Leena Searching for words: syntactic and sequential construction of word search in conversations of Finnish speakers with aphasia Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 1 2004 1-37
11. Kärkkäinen Elise Sorjonen Marja-Leena Helasvuo Marja-Liisa in press. Discourse structure. In: Shopen, T. (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Lerner Gene On the syntax of sentences-in-progress Language in Society 20 1991 441-458
13. Lerner Gene Responsive list construction Journal of Language and Social Psychology 131 1994 20-33
14. Lerner Gene 1996. On the 'semi-permeable' character of grammatical units in conversation: conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In: Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A., Thompson, Sandra A. (Eds.), Grammar and Interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. Lerner Gene Takagi Tomoyo On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: a co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices Journal of Pragmatics 31 1999 49-75
16. Local John 2004. On the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completions. In: Hardcastle, W., Beck, J. (Eds.), A Figure of Speech: A Festschrift for John Laver. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
17. Ono Tsuyoshi Yoshida Eri 1996. A study of co-construction in Japanese: we don't "finish each other's sentences." In: Akatsuka, N., Iwasaki, S., Strauss, S. (Eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 5. CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 115-129.
18. Ono Tsuyoshi Thompson Sandra A. 1996. Interaction and Syntax in the Structure of Conversational Discourse: Collaboration, Overlap, and Syntactic Dissociation. In: Hovy, Eduard H. Scott, Donia R. (Eds.), Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues - An Interdisciplinary Account. Springer, Berlin.
19. Sacks Harvey 1992 [1967-1968]. In: Jefferson, Gail (Ed.), Lectures on Conversation. Blackwell, Oxford.
20. Schegloff Emanuel A. 1996. Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction. In: Och, E., Schegloff, E.A., Thompson, S.A. (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, vol. 13. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 52-133.
21. Sorjonen M.-L. 1997. Recipient activities: particles nii(n) and joo as responses in Finnish conversations. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Applied Linguistics, UCLA.
22. Sorjonen M.-L. Dialogipartikkelien tehtävistä [English summary: On the use of response words] Virittäjä 103 1999 170-194
23. Szczepek Beatrice 2000a. Formal aspects of collaborative productions in English conversation. InLiSt-Interaction and Linguistic Structures, No. 17. URL: http://inlist.uni-konstanz.de/issues/17/index.htm.
24. Szczepek Beatrice 2000b. Functional aspects of collaborative productions in English conversation. InLiSt-Interaction and Linguistic Structures, No. 21. URL: http://inlist.uni-konstanz.de/issues/21/index.htm.
25. Tanaka Hiroko 1999. Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study in Grammar and Interaction. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
26. Vilkuna Maria 1989. Free Word Order in Finnish: Its Syntax and Discourse Functions. Finnish Literature Society, Helsinki.