Coronary in-stent restenosis: Assessment with CT coronary angiography

Radiology

Volumn 265, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 410-417

  Andreini, Daniele ^a   Pontone, Gianluca ^a   Mushtaq, Saima ^a   Bartorelli, Antonio L ^a,b   Bertella, Erika ^a   Trabattoni, Daniela ^a   Montorsi, Piero ^a,b   Galli, Stefano ^a   Foti, Claudia ^a   Annoni, Andrea ^a   Bovis, Francesca ^a   Ballerini, Giovanni ^a   Agostoni, Piergiuseppe ^a,b   Fiorentini, Cesare ^a,b   Pepi, Mauro ^a  

^a CENTRO CARDIOLOGICO MONZINO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; CORONARY STENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; FEMALE; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84867919671     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112363     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Achenbach S. Computed tomography cor onary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48(10):1919-1928. (Pubitemid 44738433)
2. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2006;27(21):2567-2572. (Pubitemid 44627301)
3. Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49(9):951-959.
4. Andreini D, Pontone G, Bartorelli AL, et al. Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2009;103(10):1349-1358.
5. Hamon M, Champ-Rigot L, Morello R, Riddell JW, Hamon M. Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2008;18(2):217-225. (Pubitemid 351234041)
6. Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, Pepi M, Bartorelli AL. Multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2010;105(5):645-655.
7. Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, et al. Diagnostic performance of two types of low radiation exposure protocol for prospective ECG-triggering multidetector computed tomography angiography in assessment of coronary artery bypass graft. Int J Cardiol 2012;157(1):63-69.
8. Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience. Eur Radiol 2009;19(12):2896-2903.
9. Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography: a comparison between prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram triggering. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54(4):346-355.
10. Min JK, Swaminathan RV, Vass M, Gallagher S, Weinsaft JW. High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3(4):246-251.
11. Tanami Y, Jinzaki M, Yamada M, Imai Y, Segawa K, Kuribayashi S. Improvement of in-stent lumen measurement accuracy with new High-Definition CT in a phantom model: comparison with conventional 64-detector row CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28(2):337-342.
12. Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J. A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 2007;34(11):4526-4544. (Pubitemid 350029675)
13. Andreini D, Pontone G, Bartorelli AL, et al. High diagnostic accuracy of prospective ECG-gating 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: in-stent restenosis assessment by low-dose MDCT. Eur Radiol 2011;21(7):1430-1438.
14. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant GR, et al. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis. A serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1996;94(6):1247-1254. (Pubitemid 26307249)
15. Geleijns J, Golding S, Menzel HG, Schibilla H. A workshop on quality criteria for computed tomography held in Arhus, Denmark, November 1998. Eur Radiol 2000;10(3):544-545. (Pubitemid 30145778)
16. Prell D, Kyriakou Y, Kachelrie M, Kalender WA. Reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography caused by hip endoprostheses using a physics-based approach. Invest Radiol 2010;45(11):747-754.
17. Cademartiri F, Schuijf JD, Pugliese F, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49(22):2204-2210. (Pubitemid 46824113)
18. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R, et al. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 2006;16(4):818-826. (Pubitemid 43380241)
19. Maintz D, Burg MC, Seifarth H, et al. Update on multidetector coronary CT angiography of coronary stents: in vitro evaluation of 29 different stent types with dual-source CT. Eur Radiol 2009;19(1):42-49.
20. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 2008;29(2):191-197.
21. Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N, et al. Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. Eur Heart J 2008;29(24):3037-3042.
22. Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, Sin D, Mayo JR. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195(5):1095-1099.