Direction-selective retinal ganglion cells arise from molecularly specified multipotential progenitors

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 43, 2012, Pages 17663-17668

  De La Huerta, Irina ^a   Kim, In Jung ^a,b   Voinescu, P Emanuela ^a   Sanes, Joshua R ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CADHERIN; CADHERIN 6; CRE RECOMBINASE; TAMOXIFEN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL TYPE; CODON; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPHOSPHORYLATION; FEMALE; HETEROZYGOTE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; RETINA AMACRINE CELL; RETINA BIPOLAR GANGLION CELL; RETINA GANGLION CELL; STEM CELL;

ANIMALS; CELL LINEAGE; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELLS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS;

EID: 84867919319     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1215806109     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bassett EA, Wallace VA (2012) Cell fate determination in the vertebrate retina. Trends Neurosci 35:565-573.
2. Cayouette M, Poggi L, Harris WA (2006) Lineage in the vertebrate retina. Trends Neurosci 29:563-570. (Pubitemid 44416460)
3. Cepko CL, Austin CP, Yang X, Alexiades M, Ezzeddine D (1996) Cell fate determination in the vertebrate retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:589-595. (Pubitemid 26041133)
4. Livesey FJ, Cepko CL (2001) Vertebrate neural cell-fate determination: Lessons from the retina. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:109-118. (Pubitemid 33673365)
5. Sanes JR, Zipursky SL (2010) Design principles of insect and vertebrate visual systems. Neuron 66:15-36.
6. Holt CE, Bertsch TW, Ellis HM, Harris WA (1988) Cellular determination in the Xenopus retina is independent of lineage and birth date. Neuron 1:15-26.
7. Turner DL, Snyder EY, Cepko CL (1990) Lineage-independent determination of cell type in the embryonic mouse retina. Neuron 4:833-845. (Pubitemid 20208509)
8. Wetts R, Fraser SE (1988) Multipotent precursors can give rise to all major cell types of the frog retina. Science 239:1142-1145. (Pubitemid 18084323)
9. Turner DL, Cepko CL (1987) A common progenitor for neurons and glia persists in rat retina late in development. Nature 328:131-136. (Pubitemid 17108213)
10. Wong LL, Rapaport DH (2009) Defining retinal progenitor cell competence in Xenopus laevis by clonal analysis. Development 136:1707-1715.
11. Alexiades MR, Cepko CL (1997) Subsets of retinal progenitors display temporally regulated and distinct biases in the fates of their progeny. Development 124:1119-1131. (Pubitemid 27142066)
12. Watanabe T, Raff MC (1990) Rod photoreceptor development in vitro: Intrinsic properties of proliferating neuroepithelial cells change as development proceeds in the rat retina. Neuron 4:461-467. (Pubitemid 20155036)
13. Cayouette M, Barres BA, Raff M (2003) Importance of intrinsic mechanisms in cell fate decisions in the developing rat retina. Neuron 40:897-904. (Pubitemid 37522048)
14. Pearson BJ, Doe CQ (2004) Specification of temporal identity in the developing nervous system. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20:619-647. (Pubitemid 39488652)
15. Qian X, et al. (2000) Timing of CNS cell generation: A programmed sequence of neuron and glial cell production from isolated murine cortical stem cells. Neuron 28:69-80.
16. Shen Q, et al. (2006) The timing of cortical neurogenesis is encoded within lineages of individual progenitor cells. Nat Neurosci 9:743-751.
17. Brzezinski JA, 4th, Kim EJ, Johnson JE, Reh TA (2011) Ascl1 expression defines a subpopulation of lineage-restricted progenitors in the mammalian retina. Development 138:3519-3531.
18. Brzezinski JA, 4th, Prasov L, Glaser T (2012) Math5 defines the ganglion cell competence state in a subpopulation of retinal progenitor cells exiting the cell cycle. Dev Biol 365:395-413.
19. Hafler BP, et al. (2012) Transcription factor Olig2 defines subpopulations of retinal progenitor cells biased toward specific cell fates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:7882-7887.
20. Jasoni CL, Reh TA (1996) Temporal and spatial pattern of MASH-1 expression in the developing rat retina demonstrates progenitor cell heterogeneity. J Comp Neurol 369:319-327. (Pubitemid 26152521)
21. Trimarchi JM, Stadler MB, Cepko CL (2008) Individual retinal progenitor cells display extensive heterogeneity of gene expression. PloS one 3:e1588.
22. Kay JN, et al. (2011) Retinal ganglion cells with distinct directional preferences differ in molecular identity, structure, and central projections. J Neurosci 31:7753-7762.
23. Kim IJ, Zhang Y, Meister M, Sanes JR (2010) Laminar restriction of retinal ganglion cell dendrites and axons: subtype-specific developmental patterns revealed with transgenic markers. J Neurosci 30:1452-1462.
24. Kim IJ, Zhang Y, Yamagata M, Meister M, Sanes JR (2008) Molecular identification of a retinal cell type that responds to upward motion. Nature 452:478-482. (Pubitemid 351450841)
25. Coombs J, van der List D, Wang GY, Chalupa LM (2006) Morphological properties of mouse retinal ganglion cells. Neuroscience 140:123-136. (Pubitemid 43668446)
26. Ju WK, et al. (2000) Ganglion cells of the rat retina show osteopontin-like immunoreactivity. Brain Res 852:217-220.
27. Xiang M, et al. (1995) The Brn-3 family of POU-domain factors: Primary structure, binding specificity, and expression in subsets of retinal ganglion cells and somatosensory neurons. J Neurosci 15:4762-4785.
28. Völgyi B, Chheda S, Bloomfield SA (2009) Tracer coupling patterns of the ganglion cell subtypes in the mouse retina. J Comp Neurol 512:664-687.
29. Buffelli M, et al. (2003) Genetic evidence that relative synaptic efficacy biases the outcome of synaptic competition. Nature 424:430-434. (Pubitemid 36917491)
30. Hayashi S, McMahon AP (2002) Efficient recombination in diverse tissues by a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre: a tool for temporally regulated gene activation/inactivation in the mouse. Dev Biol 244:305-318. (Pubitemid 34450645)
31. Vaney DI, Sivyer B, Taylor WR (2012) Direction selectivity in the retina: Symmetry and asymmetry in structure and function. Nat Rev Neurosci 13:194-208.
32. Madisen L, et al. (2010) A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci 13:133-140.
33. Gray GE, Glover JC, Majors J, Sanes JR (1988) Radial arrangement of clonally related cells in the chicken optic tectum: Lineage analysis with a recombinant retrovirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:7356-7360.
34. Kaufman M (1979) Cephalic neurulation and optic vesicle formation in the early mouse embryo. Am J Anat 155:425-443.
35. Haverkamp S, Wässle H (2000) Immunocytochemical analysis of the mouse retina. J Comp Neurol 424:1-23. (Pubitemid 30602070)
36. Ghosh KK, Bujan S, Haverkamp S, Feigenspan A, Wässle H (2004) Types of bipolar cells in the mouse retina. J Comp Neurol 469:70-82. (Pubitemid 38036893)
37. Yu YC, Bultje RS, Wang X, Shi SH (2009) Specific synapses develop preferentially among sister excitatory neurons in the neocortex. Nature 458:501-504.
38. Voinescu PE, Kay JN, Sanes JR (2009) Birthdays of retinal amacrine cell subtypes are systematically related to their molecular identity and soma position. J Comp Neurol 517:737-750.
39. Godinho L, et al. (2007) Nonapical symmetric divisions underlie horizontal cell layer formation in the developing retina in vivo. Neuron 56:597-603. (Pubitemid 350102034)
40. Rompani SB, Cepko CL (2008) Retinal progenitor cells can produce restricted subsets of horizontal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:192-197.
41. Buonanno A, Fields RD (1999) Gene regulation by patterned electrical activity during neural and skeletal muscle development. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:110-120. (Pubitemid 29084097)
42. Francis NJ, Landis SC (1999) Cellular and molecular determinants of sympathetic neuron development. Annu Rev Neurosci 22:541-566. (Pubitemid 29144897)
43. Cherry TJ, Trimarchi JM, Stadler MB, Cepko CL (2009) Development and diversification of retinal amacrine interneurons at single cell resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:9495-9500.
44. Kay JN, Voinescu PE, Chu MW, Sanes JR (2011) Neurod6 expression defines new retinal amacrine cell subtypes and regulates their fate. Nat Neurosci 14:965-972.
45. Gomes FL, et al. (2011) Reconstruction of rat retinal progenitor cell lineages in vitro reveals a surprising degree of stochasticity in cell fate decisions. Development 138:227-235.
46. Packard DS, Jr., Menzies RA, Skalko RG (1973) Incorportaiton of thymidine and its analogue, bromodeoxyuridine, into embryos and maternal tissues of the mouse. Differentiation 1:397-404.