Robot-assisted right colectomy with lymphadenectomy and intracorporeal anastomosis for colon cancer: Technical considerations

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Park, Soo Y ^a   Choi, Gyu Seog ^a   Park, Jun S ^a   Kim, Hye J ^a   Choi, Whon Ho ^a   Ryuk, Jong P ^a  

^a Kyungpook National University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

colon cancer; right colectomy; robotic right colectomy; robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL ABSCESS; ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS STENOSIS; ARTICLE; ATELECTASIS; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COLON ANASTOMOSIS; COLON CANCER; COLON MOTILITY; COLON RESECTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FLUID INTAKE; HUMAN; INTESTINE TRANSPLANTATION; INTRACORPOREAL ANASTOMOSIS; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OPERATION DURATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOT ASSISTED RIGHT COLECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SUBCUTANEOUS EMPHYSEMA; SURGEON; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; COLECTOMY; COLON; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84867884638     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: 15344908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31826581bd     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparo-scopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224-2229.
2. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050-2059.
3. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1718-1726.
4. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma:3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3061-3068.
5. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:655-662; discussion 662-664.
6. Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A, et al. The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg. 2008;248:1-7.
7. Lee SD, Lim SB. D3 lymphadenectomy using a medial to lateral approach for curable right-sided colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:295-300.
8. McKenzie S, Baek JH, Wakabayashi M, et al. Totally laparoscopic right colectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction: the authors' initial institutional experience. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2048-2052.
9. Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1689-1694; discussion 1695-1696.
10. Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Crawford DL. Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies:30 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1713-1718.
11. Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, et al. Robotic versus laparo-scopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1480-1487.
12. Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, et al. Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1614-1620.
13. Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1701-1708.
14. Lezoche E, Feliciotti F, Paganini AM, et al. Laparoscopic vs open hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16:596-602.
15. Baca I, Perko Z, Bokan I, et al. Technique and survival after laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:650-655.
16. Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1389-1402.
17. Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, et al. Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:117-119.
18. Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3195-3202.
19. Jayaraman S, Quan D, Al-Ghamdi I, et al. Does robotic assistance improve efficiency in performing complex minimally invasive surgical procedures? Surg Endosc. 2010;24:584-588.
20. Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, et al. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17:171-174.
21. Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1521-1525.
22. D'Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:2162-2168.
23. Baik SH, Lee WJ, Rha KH, et al. Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using four robotic arms. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:792-797.
24. deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Park JJ, et al. Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1000-1006.
25. Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:583-596.
26. Wong JH, Severino R, Honnebier MB, et al. Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2896-2900.
27. Gumus M, Yumuk PF, Atalay G, et al. What is the optimal number of lymph nodes to be dissected in colorectal cancer surgery? Tumori. 2005;91:168-172.
28. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. Chicago: Springer; 2002.
29. Park IJ, Choi GS, Kang BM, et al. Lymph node metastasis patterns in right-sided colon cancers: is segmental resection of these tumors oncologically safe? Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1501-1506.
30. Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, et al. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003;170:1738-1741.
31. Park JS, Choi GS, Kim HJ, et al. Natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy. Br J Surg. 2011;98:710-715.
32. Franklin ME Jr, Kelley H, Kelley M, et al. Transvaginal extraction of the specimen after total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Lapa-rosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18:294-298.
33. Hellan M, Anderson C, Pigazzi A. Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolec-tomy. JSLS. 2009;13:312-317.
34. Scatizzi M, Kroning KC, Borrelli A, et al. Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case-control study. World J Surg. 2010;34:2902-2908.