Take the first heuristic, self-efficacy, and decision-making in sport

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 154-161

  Hepler, Teri J ^a   Feltz, Deborah L ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive; Decision; Efficacy; Heuristics

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SPORT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF EFFICACY; SPORTS;

EID: 84867874681     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0027807     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
2. Bandura, A. (2005). Guide for creating self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307-338). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
3. Beilock, S. L., Bertenthal, B. I., Hoerger, M., & Carr, T. H. (2008). When does haste make waste? Expertise, speed vs. accuracy instructions, and the tools of the trade. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 340-352. doi:10.1037/a0012859
4. Beilock, S. L., Bertenthal, B. I., McCoy, A. M., & Carr, T. H. (2004). Haste does not always make waste: Expertise, direction of attention and speed versus accuracy in performing sensorimotor skills. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 373-379. doi:10.3758/BF03196585
5. Beilock, S. L., & DeCaro, M. S. (2007). From poor performance to success under stress: Working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 983-998. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.983
6. Ben Zur, H., & Breznitz, S. J. (1981). The effects of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psycholigca, 47, 89-104. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(81)90001-9
7. Bouffard-Bouchard, T., Parent, S., & Larivee, S. (1991). Influence of self-efficacy on self-regulation and performance among junior and senior high-school age students. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14, 153-164.
8. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making an in uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.432
9. Cicirelli, V. G. (2006). Caregiving decision making by older mother and adult children: Process and expected outcome. Psychology and Aging, 21, 209-221. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.209
10. Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E., & Sullivan, P. J. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
11. Gigerenzer, G., Fiedler, K., & Olsson, H. (in press). Rethinking cognitive biases as environmental consequences. In P. M. Todd, G. Gigerenzer & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world (pp. 80-112). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12. Hepler, T. J., & Chase, M. A. (2008). Relationship between decisionmaking, task self-efficacy, and the performance of a sport skill. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26, 603-610.
13. Johnson, J G., & Raab, M. (2003). Take the first: Option generation and resulting choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 215-229.
14. Klein, G., Wolf, S., Militello, L., & Zsambok, C. (1995). Characteristics of skilled option generation in chess. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 63-69.
15. Nordgren, L. F., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2009). The devil is in the deliberation: Thinking too much reduces preference consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 39-46. doi:10.1086/596306
16. Ordóñez, L., & Benson, L., III. (1997). Decisions under time pressure: How time constraint affects risky decision making. Organizational Be-havior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 121-140. doi:10.1006/ obhd.1997.2717
17. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Raab, M., & Johnson, J. G. (2004). Individual differences of action orientation for risktaking in sports. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 75, 326-336.
19. Raab, M., & Johnson, J. G. (2007). Expertise-based differences in search and option-generation strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 158-170. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.13.3.158
20. Raab, M., & Laborde, S. (2011). When to blink and when to think: Preference for intuitive decisions results in faster and better tactical choices. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Science, 82, 89-98.
21. Roe, R. M., Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychological Review, 108, 370-392. doi:10.1037/0033295X.108.2.370
22. Starkes, J. L., & Ericsson, K. A. (Eds.) (2003). Expert performance in sports. Human Champaign, IL: Kinetics.
23. Tenenbaum, G., Levy-Kolker, N., Sade, S. S., Lieberman, D., & Lidor, D. (1996). Anticipation and confidence of decisions related to skilled performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 27, 293-307.
24. Wegwarth, O., Gaissmaier, W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2009). Smart strategies for doctors and doctors-in-training: Heuristics in medicine. Medical Education, 43, 721-728. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03359.x
25. Whyte, J., Ward, P., & Eccles, D. W. (2009). The relationship between knowledge and clinical performance in novice and experienced critical care nurses. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 38, 517-525. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2008.12.006