Individual differences of action orientation for risk taking in sports

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 326-336

  Raab, Markus ^a   Johnson, Joseph G ^b  

^a University of Flensburg   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Basketball; Decision field theory; Decision making; Modeling

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BASKETBALL; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EMPIRICISM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK; SPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 12744273860     PISSN: 02701367     EISSN: 21683824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2004.10609164     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Alain, C., & Sarrazin, C. (1990). Study of decision-making in squash competition: A computer simulation approach. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 193-200.
2. Bar-Eli, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2001). Criticality of game situations and decision making in basketball: An application of performance crisis perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 1,27-39.
3. Beckmann, J. (1994). Volitional correlates of action and state orientations. In j. Kuhl &J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action and state orientation (pp. 155-166). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
4. Beckmann, J., Trux, I. (1991). Wen lasse ich wo spielen? [Who plays what position?] Sportpsychologie, 5, 18-21.
5. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1992). Fundamental derivations from decision field theory. Mathematical Social Sciences, 23, 255-282.
6. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459.
7. Dahme, G., Bleich, C., Jungnickel, D., & Rathje, H. (1992). Some encouraging results concerning the reliability and some discouraging outcomes concerning the construct validity of the HAKEMP: Data from a field study. Festschrift for Differential and Diagnostics Psychology, 13, 139-160.
8. Heckhausen, H., & Strang, H. (1988). Efficiency under record performance demands: Exertion control, an individual-difference variable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55,489-498.
9. Kuhl, J. (1986). Human motivation: From decision making to action control. In B. Rehmer, B. Jungermann, P. Laures, & G. Sevon (Eds.), New directions in research on decision making (pp. 5-28). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
10. Kuhl, J. (1990). Instructions for questionnaire HAKEMP Version 1990. Munich, Germany: Max Planck Institute.
11. Raab, M. (1996). Einflussfaktoren taktischer Leistungsfähigkeit [Factors of tactical performance]. In F. Dannenmann (Ed.), Volleyball 1995. Congress of the German Volleyball Association (pp. 127-140). Hamburg: Czwalina.
12. Raab, M. (2002). T-ECHO: Model of decision making to explain behavior in experiments and simulations under time pressure. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3,151-171.
13. Raab, M. (2003). Decision-making in sports: Influence of complexity as a factor in implicit and explicit learning. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1, 406-433.
14. Roth, K, & Strang, H. (1994). Action versus state orientation and the control of tactical decisions in sports. In J. Kuhl &J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality. Action versus state orientation (pp. 467-474). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
15. Sack, P. M. (1990). Eine revisierte Skala zur Messung von Handlungskontrolle [A revised scale for assessing action control]. Festschrift for Differentials and Diagnostics Psychology, 11, 233-241.
16. Sack, P. M., & Witte, E. H. (1990). Untersuchung zur Konstruktvalidität des HAKEMP 85 von J. Kuhl [Construct validity of HAKEMP 85 from J. Kuhl]. Festschrift for Differentials and Diagnostics Psychology, 11,17-26.