Validation of point-wise exponential regression to measure the decay rates of glaucomatous visual fields

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 53, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 5403-5409

  Azarbod, Parham ^a,b   Mock, Dennis ^a   Bitrian, Elena ^a   Afifi, Abdelmonem A ^c   Yu, Fei ^a,c   Nouri Mahdavi, Kouros ^a   Coleman, Anne L ^a   Caprioli, Joseph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; POINT WISE EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VALIDATION STUDY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DISEASE COURSE; HOSPITALIZATION; MIDDLE AGED; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIMETRY; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL FIELD;

AGED; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84867859637     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-9930     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Caprioli J. The importance of rates in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:191-192.
2. Bosworth CF, Sample PA, Johnson CA, Weinreb RN. Current practice with standard automated perimetry. Semin Ophthalmol. 2000;15:172-181.
3. Werner EB, Bishop KI, Koelle J, et al. A comparison of experienced clinical observers and statistical tests in detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;106:619-623.
4. Viswanathan AC, Crabb DP, McNaught AI, et al. Interobserver agreement on visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of methods. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:726-730.
5. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Nassiri N, Giangiacomo A, Caprioli J. Detection of visual field progression in glaucoma with standard achromatic perimetry: a review and practical implications. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249: 1593-1616.
6. Caprioli J, Mock D, Bitrian E, et al. A method to measure and predict rates of regional visual field decay in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:4765-4773.
7. Thissen D, Steinberg L, Kuang D. Quick and easy implementation of the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure for controlling the false positive rate in multiple comparisons. J Educ Behav Stat. 2002;27:77-83.
8. Choplin NT, Edwards RP. Visual Field Testing with the HUMPHREY FIELD ANALYZER. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 1995.
9. Bengtsson B, Patella VM, Heijl A. Prediction of glaucomatous visual field loss by extrapolation of linear trends. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:1610-1615.
10. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1544-1549.
11. Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters. 2006;27:861-874.
12. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1445-1455.
13. Drance S, Anderson DR, Schulzer M. Risk factors for progression of visual field abnormalities in normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:699-708.
14. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 1. Study design and methods and baseline characteristics of study patients. Control Clin Trials. 1994;15:299-325.
15. Gillespie BW, Musch DC, Guire KE, et al. The collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study: baseline visual field and testretest variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2613-2620.
16. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2144-2153.
17. McNaught AI, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Modelling series of visual fields to detect progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995;233:750-755.
18. Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Poinoosawmy D, McNaught AI, Crabb DP. Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:40-48.
19. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J, Coleman AL, Hoffman D, Gaasterland D. Pointwise linear regression for evaluation of visual field outcomes and comparison with the advanced glaucoma intervention study methods. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:193-199.