Prediction of glaucomatous visual field loss by extrapolation of linear trends

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 127, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1610-1615

  Bengtsson, Boel ^a   Patella, Vincent Michael ^b   Heijl, Anders ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b CARL ZEISS SMT AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DISEASE COURSE; EYE EXAMINATION; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; FEMALE; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIMETRY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISUAL DISORDER;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 73349094411     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: 15383601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.297     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108(2):130-135.
2. Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Poinoosawmy D, McNaught AI, Crabb DP. Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(1): 40-48.
3. Bengtsson B, Lindgren A, Heijl A, Lindgren G, Asman P, Patella M. Perimetric probability maps to separate change caused by glaucoma from that caused by cataract. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75(2):184-188.
4. Gardiner SK, Crabb DP. Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; 43(5):1400-1407.
5. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study, 2: visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(8):1445-1455.
6. Musch DC, Lichter PR, Guire KE, Standardi CL. The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(4):653-662.
7. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(4):487-497.
8. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(11):2144-2153.
9. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Dong L, Yang Z; EMGT Group. Predictors of long-term progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(11):1965-1972.
10. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Bengtsson B, Hussein M; Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Measuring visual field progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003;81(3):286-293.
11. Anderson DR, Drance SM, Schulzer M; Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Natural history of normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(2):247-253.
12. Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Buchholz P, Norrgren G. Rates of visual field progression in glaucoma care [abstract E-1155]. Paper presented at: 2008 ARVO Annual Meeting; April 28, 2008; Fort Lauderdale, FL.
13. Bebie H. Computerized techniques of visual field analysis. In: Drance SM, Anderson D, eds. Automatic Perimetry in Glaucoma. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton, Inc; 1985:147-160.
14. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. A package for the statistical analysis of visual fields. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1987;49:153-168.
15. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(2):343-353.
16. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Gaasterland D, Caprioli J. Prediction of visual field progression in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(12):4346-4351.
17. McNaught AI, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Modelling series of visual fields to detect progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995;233(12):750-755.
18. Boel B, Anders H. Acceptable frequencies of false answers in computerized perimetry [abstract 2539]. Paper presented at: 2000 ARVO Annual Meeting; May 2, 2000; Fort Lauderdale, FL.
19. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and the Humphrey Full Threshold computerized perimetry strategies, SITA STATPAC. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999;77(2):125-129.
20. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Reliability parameters in computerized perimetry. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1987;49:593-600.
21. Katz J, Sommer A. Reliability indexes of automated perimetric tests. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(9):1252-1254.
22. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41(8):2201-2204.
23. Asman P, Heijl A. Glaucoma hemifield test: automated visual field evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(6):812-819.
24. Stewart WC, Kolker AE, Sharpe ED, et al. Factors associated with long-term progression or stability in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000; 130(3):274-279.
25. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Komaroff E; Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(1): 48-56.
26. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Coleman AL, et al; Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(9):1627-1635.
27. Manassakorn A, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Koucheki B, Law SK, Caprioli J. Pointwise linear regression analysis for detection of visual field progression with absolute versus corrected threshold sensitivities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47 (7):2896-2903.
28. Mikelberg FS, Schulzer M, Drance SM, Lau W. The rate of progression of scotomas in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101(1):1-6.
29. Kwon YH, Kim CS, Zimmerman MB, Alward WL, Hayreh SS. Rate of visual field loss and long-term visual outcome in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132(1):47-56.
30. Pereira ML, Kim CS, Zimmerman MB, Alward WL, Hayreh SS, Kwon YH. Rate and pattern of visual field decline in primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(12):2232-2240.
31. Wild JM, Hutchings N, Hussey MK, Flanagan JG, Trope GE. Pointwise univariate linear regression of perimetric sensitivity against follow-up time in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(5):808-815.
32. Rasker MT, van den Enden A, Bakker D, Hoyng PF. Rate of visual field loss in progressive glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(4):481-488.
33. Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37(7):1419-1428.
34. Katz J, Gilbert D, Quigley HA, Sommer A. Estimating progression of visual field loss in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(6):1017-1025.