Pointwise linear regression for evaluation of visual field outcomes and comparison with the advanced glaucoma intervention study methods

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 123, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 193-199

  Nouri Mahdavi, Kouros ^a   Caprioli, Joseph ^a   Coleman, Anne L ^a   Hoffman, Douglas ^a   Gaasterland, Douglas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Univ Ophthal Consult Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION TEST; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; TRABECULECTOMY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 13244298171     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.123.2.193     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Boeglin RJ, Caprioli J, Zulauf M. Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:396-400.
2. Werner EB, Bishop KI, Koelle J, et al. A comparison of experienced clinical observers and statistical tests in detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:619-623.
3. Katz J, Congdon N, Friedman DS. Methodological variations in estimating apparent progressive visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1137-1142.
4. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study, 2: visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1445-1455.
5. Lee AC, Sample PA, Blumenthal EZ, Berry C, Zangwill L, Weinreb RN. Infrequent confirmation of visual field progression. Ophthalmology, 2002;109:1059-1065.
6. Vesti E, Johnson CA, Chauhan BC. Comparison of different methods for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3873-3879.
7. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS), 1: study design and methods and baseline characteristics of study patients. Control Clin Trials. 1994;15:299-325.
8. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS). Manual of Operations. Springfield, Va: National Technical Information Service; 1993. Publication PB93-220192.
9. Ederer F. Serum cholesterol changes: effects of diet and regression toward the mean. J Chronic Dis. 1972;25:277-289.
10. Gardiner SK, Crabb DP. Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1400-1407.
11. Hitchings RA, Migdal CS, Wormald R, Poinooswamy D, Fitzke F. The primary treatment trial: changes in the visual field analysis by computer-assisted perimetry. Eye. 1994;8:117-120.
12. Westcott MC, Hoffman D, Gaasterland D, Viswanathan AC, Caprioli J. Agreement between pointwise linear regression and AGIS score change in identifying visual field deterioration in glaucoma [ARVO abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:S560.
13. Membrey WL, Poinoosawmy DP, Bunce C, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Comparison of visual field progression in patients with normal pressure glaucoma between eyes with and without visual field loss that threatens fixation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1154-1158.
14. Membrey WL, Bunce C, Poinoosawmy DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Glaucoma surgery with or without adjunctive antiproliferatives in normal tension glaucoma, 2: visual field progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:696-701.
15. Landis J, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
16. Katz J. Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:391-395.
17. McNaught Al, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Modelling series of visual fields to detect progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995;233:750-755.
18. Crabb D, Fitzke F, Hitchings R. Detecting Gradual and Sudden Sensitivity Loss in Series of Visual Fields. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kugler; 1999.
19. Krakau C. A statistical trap in the evaluation of visual field decay. Acta Ophthalmologica Suppl. 1985;173:19-21.
20. Holmin C, Krakau CE. Regression analysis of the central visual field in chronic glaucoma cases: a follow-up study using automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1982;60:267-274.
21. Spry PG, Bates AB, Johnson CA, Chauhan BC. Simulation of longitudinal threshold visual field data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2192-2200.
22. Noureddin BN, Poinoosawmy D, Fietzke FW, Hitchings RA. Regression analysis of visual field progression in low tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991;75:493-495.
23. Viswanathan AC, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Early detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of PROGRESSOR and STATPAC 2. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:1037-1042.
24. Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Lindgren G. Visual field progression in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:1097-1098.
25. Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:1419-1428.
26. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Brigatti L, Weitzman M, Caprioli J. Comparison of methods to detect visual field progression in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1228-1236.
27. Katz J, Gilbert D, Quigley HA, Sommer A. Estimating progression of visual field loss in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1017-1025.
28. Crabb D, Edgar D, Fitzke F, McNaught A, Wynn H. New approach to estimating variability in visual field data using an image processing technique. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:213-217.
29. Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, McNaught Al, Edgar DF, Hitchings RA. Improving the prediction of visual field progression in glaucoma using spatial processing. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:517-524.
30. Spry PG, Johnson CA, Bates AB, Turpin A, Chauhan BC. Spatial and temporal processing of threshold data for detection of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:173-180.
31. McNaught AI, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Visual field progression: comparison of Humphrey Statpac2 and pointwise linear regression analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996;234:411-418.
32. Bhandari A, Crabb DP, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Noureddin BN. Effect of surgery on visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1131-1137.
33. Wild JM, Hutchings N, Hussey MK, Flanagan JG, Trope GE. Pointwise univariate linear regression of perimetric sensitivity against follow-up time in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:808-815.
34. Perneger T. What's wrong with Bonferroniadjustments. BMJ. 1998;316:1236-1238.
35. Spry PG, Johnson CA. Identification of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47:158-173.
36. Heiji A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1544-1549.
37. Spry P, Johnson C. Senescent changes of the visual field: an age-old problem. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78:436-441.
38. O'Brien C, Schwartz B, Takamoto T, Wu DC. Intraocular pressure and the rate of visual field loss in chronic open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111:491-500.
39. Rasker MT, van den Enden A, Bakker D, Hoyng PF. Rate of visual field loss in progressive glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:481-488.
40. Wild JM, Hussey MK, Flanagan JG, Trope GE. Pointwise topographical and longitudinal modeling of the visual field in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:1907-1916.