Corrigendum: Single group, pre- and post-test research designs: Some methodological concerns (Oxford Review of Education, (2012) 38:5, (583-616), 10.1080/03054985.2012.731208);Single group, pre- and post-test research designs: Some methodological concerns

Oxford Review of Education

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 583-616

  Marsden, Emma ^a   Torgerson, Carole J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

control group; education research; pre experiment; regression to the mean; research design; research methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867845313     PISSN: 03054985     EISSN: 14653915     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2014.959825     Document Type: Erratum

References (34)

1. Annetta, L., Mangrum, J., Holmes, S., Collazo, K. and Cheng, M. 2009. Bridging realty to virtual reality: investigating gender effect and student engagement on learning through video game play in an elementary school. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8): 1091-1113.
2. Bell, J., Donnelly, J., Homer, M. and Pell, G. 2009. A value-added study of the impact of science curriculum reform using the national pupil database. British Educational Research Journal, 35(1): 119-135.
3. Benati, A., Lee, J. and McNulty, E. 2010. "Exploring the effects of Processing Instruction on a discourse-level guided composition". In Processing instruction and discourse, Edited by: Benati, A. and Lee, J. 97-147. London: Continuum.
4. Ben-David, A. and Zohar, A. 2009. Contribution of meta-strategic knowledge to scientific inquiry learning. International Journal of Science Education, 31(12): 1657-1682.
5. Brady, S., Gillis, M., Smith, T., Lavalette, M., Liss-Bronstein, L., Lowe, E., North, W., Russo, E. and Wilder, T.D. 2009. First grade teachers' knowledge of phonological awareness and code concepts: examining gains from an intensive form of professional development and corresponding teacher attitudes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(4): 425-429.
6. Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.C. 1963. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research, Chicago, IL: RandMcNally.
7. Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. 1979. Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8. Ducate, L. and Lomicka, L. 2009. Podcasting: an effective tool for honing language students' pronunciation?. Language Learning and Technology, 13(3): 66-86.
9. Evagorou, M., Korfiatis, K., Nicolaou, C. and Constantinou, C. 2009. An investigation of the potential of interactive simulations for developing thinking skills in elementary school: a case study with fifth-graders and sixth-graders. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5): 655-674.
10. Galton, F. 1886. Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 15: 246-263.
11. Grace, M. 2009. Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4): 551-570.
12. Graebner, I.T., de Souza, E.M.T. and Saito, C.H. 2009. Action-research and food and nutrition security: a school experience mediated by conceptual graphic representation tool. International Journal of Science Education, 31(6): 809-827.
13. Guisasola, J., Solbes, J., Barragues, J.-I., Morentin, M. and Moreno, A. 2009. Students' understanding of the special theory of relativity and design for a guided visit to a science museum. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15): 2085-2104.
14. Jones, G., Taylor, A. and Broadwell, B. 2009. Estimating linear size and scale: body rulers. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11): 1495-1509.
15. Lipsey, M.W. and Wilson, D.B. 1993. The efficacy of psychological, educational and behavioral treatment: confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48(12): 1181-1209.
16. MacArthur, C.A. and Lembo, L. 2009. Strategy instruction in writing for adult literacy learners. Reading and Writing, 22(9): 1021-1039.
17. Marsden, E. (2004) Teaching and learning of French verb inflections: a classroom experiment using processing instruction. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southampton.
18. Marsden, E. 2006. Exploring input processing in the classroom: an experimental comparison of processing instruction and enriched input. Language Learning, 56: 507-566.
19. McCutchen, D., Green, L., Abbott, R. and Sanders, E. 2009. Further evidence for teacher knowledge: supporting struggling readers in grades three through five. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(4): 401-423.
20. Miedijensky, S. and Tal, T. 2009. Embedded assessment in project-based science courses for the gifted: insights to inform teaching all students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(18): 2411-2435.
21. Moore, M. and Wade, B. 1998. Reading and comprehension: a longitudinal study of ex-Reading Recovery students. Educational Studies, 24: 195-203.
22. Newton, D.P. and Newton, L.D. 2009. Knowledge development at the time of use: a problem-based approach to lesson planning in primary teacher training in a low knowledge, low skill context. Educational Studies, 35(3): 311-321.
23. Norris, J. and Ortega, L. 2000. Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50: 417-528.
24. O'Byrne, B. 2009. Knowing more than words can say: using multimodal assessment tools to excavate and construct knowledge about wolves. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4): 523-539.
25. Park, H., Khan, S. and Petrina, S. 2009. ICT in science education: a quasi-experimental study of achievement, attitudes toward science, and career aspirations of Korean middle school students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8): 993-1012.
26. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
27. Sherin, M.G. and van Es, E.A. 2009. Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1): 20-37.
28. Sherrod, S.E. and Wilhelm, J. 2009. A study of how classroom dialogue facilitates the development of geometric spatial concepts related to understanding the cause of moon phases. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7): 873-894.
29. Spalding, E., Wang, J., Lin, E. and Hu, G. 2009. Analyzing voice in the writing of Chinese teachers of English. Research in the Teaching of English, 44(1): 23-51.
30. Taylor, A. and Jones, G. 2009. Proportional reasoning ability and concepts of scale: Surface area to volume relationships in science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(9): 1231-1247.
31. Thorndike, R.L. 1942. Regression fallacies in the matched groups experiment. Psychometrika, 7: 85-102.
32. Torgerson, C. and Torgerson, D. 2008. Designing and running randomised trials in health, education and the social sciences: an introduction, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
33. Tsaparlis, G. and Papaphotis, G. 2009. High-school students' conceptual difficulties and attempts and conceptual change: the case of basic quantum chemical concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7): 895-930.
34. Wilhelm, J. 2009. Gender differences in lunar-related scientific and mathematical understandings. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15): 2105-2122.