Tangential streaming potential/current measurements for the characterization of composite membranes

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 423-424, Issue , 2012, Pages 413-421

  Déon, Sébastien ^a   Fievet, Patrick ^a   Osman Doubad, Choukri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Electric conductance; Electrokinetic charge; Membrane characterization; Streaming current; Streaming potential; Zeta potential

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE LAYER; CHANNEL HEIGHT; CLASSICAL METHODS; COEFFICIENT MEASUREMENT; COMPOSITE POLYMER MEMBRANE; CONDUCTANCE MEASUREMENT; ELECTROKINETIC CHARGE; ELECTROKINETIC MEASUREMENTS; EXTERNAL SURFACES; MEMBRANE CHARACTERIZATION; MEMBRANE SUPPORTS; MEMBRANE SURFACE; PORE SURFACE; POROUS BODIES; SINGLE CHANNELS; STREAMING CURRENT; STREAMING POTENTIAL; STREAMING POTENTIAL MEASUREMENTS; TANGENTIAL MODES;

COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; ELECTRIC CONDUCTANCE; ELECTRODYNAMICS; FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS; MEMBRANES; ZETA POTENTIAL;

MEASUREMENTS;

POLYMER;

ARTICLE; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; KINETICS; MEASUREMENT; MEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE; MEMBRANE CURRENT; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; ZETA POTENTIAL;

EID: 84867743915     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.08.038     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Capelle N., Moulin P., Charbit F., Gallo R. Purification of heterocyclic drug derivatives from concentrated saline solution by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 196:125-141.
2. Umpuch C., Galier S., Kanchanatawee S., Roux-de Balmann H. Nanofiltration as a purification step in production process of organic acids: selectivity improvement by addition of an inorganic salt. Process Biochem. 2010, 45:1763-1768.
3. Walha K., Amar R.B., Bourseau P., Jaouen P. Nanofiltration of concentrated and salted tuna cooking juices. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2009, 87:331-335.
4. Déon S., Dutournié P., Limousy L., Bourseau P. The two-dimensional pore and polarization transport model to describe mixtures separation by nanofiltration: model validation. A.I.Ch.E. J. 2011, 57:985-995.
5. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W., Hilal N. Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes-use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 126:91-105.
6. Cavaco Morão A.I., Szymczyk A., Fievet P., Brites Alves A.M. Modelling the separation by nanofiltration of a multi-ionic solution relevant to an industrial process. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 322:320-330.
7. Déon S., Escoda A., Fievet P., Dutournié P., Bourseau P. How to use a multi-ionic transport model to fully predict rejection of mineral salts by nanofiltration membranes. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 189-190:24-31.
8. Boussu K., Van der Bruggen B., Volodin A., Van Haesendonck C., Delcour J.A., Van der Meeren P., Vandecasteele C. Characterization of commercial nanofiltration membranes and comparison with self-made polyethersulfone membranes. Desalination 2006, 191:245-253.
9. Adamczyk Z., Zembala M., Michna A. Polyelectrolyte adsorption layers studied by streaming potential and particle deposition. J. Colloids. Interf. Sci. 2006, 303:353-364.
10. Dejeu J., Lakard B., Fievet P., Lakard S. Characterization of charge properties of an ultrafiltration membrane modified by surface grafting of poly(allylamine) hydrochloride. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2009, 333:335-340.
11. Benavente J., García J.M., de la Campa J.G., de Abajo J. Determination of some electrical parameters for two novel aliphatic-aromatic polyamide membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 114:51-57.
12. Pontié M. Effect of aging on UF membranes by a streaming potential (SP) method. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 154:213-220.
13. Diasse-Sarr A., Essis-Tome H., Diawara C.K., Quemeneur F.i., Firdaous L., Innocent C., Elana A., Kecili K., Pontie M. New electrokinetics tools for studying ageing of ED and NF membrane processes in contact with highly salted solutions from seawater. Desalination 2004, 167:393-396.
14. Nystrom M., Kaipia L., Luque S. Fouling and retention of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 98:249-262.
15. Causserand C., Nystrom M., Aimar P. Study of streaming potentials of clean and fouled ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 88:211-222.
16. Lanteri Y., Fievet P., Magnenet C., Déon S., Szymczyk A. Electrokinetic characterisation of particle deposits from streaming potential coupled with permeate flux measurements during dead-end filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 378:224-232.
17. Pontié M., Chasseray X., Lemordant D., Lainé J.M. The streaming potential method for the caracterization of ultrafiltration organic membranes and the control of cleaning treatments. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 129:125.
18. Lawrence N.D., Perera J.M., Iyer M., Hickey M.W., Stevens G.W. The use of streaming potential measurements to study the fouling and cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 48:106-112.
19. Nyström M., Zhu H. Characterization of cleaning results using combined flux and streaming potential methods. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 131:195-205.
20. Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34:3710-3716.
21. Cavaco Morão A.I., Brites Alves A.M., Afonso M.D. Concentration of clavulanic acid broths: influence of the membrane surface charge density on NF operation. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:417-428.
22. Elimelech M., Chen W.H., Waypa J.J. Measuring the zeta (electrokinetic) potential of reverse osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyzer. Desalination 1994, 95:269-286.
23. Kim K.J., Fane A.G., Nystrom M., Pihlajamaki A., Bowen W.R., Mukhtar H. Evaluation of electroosmosis and streaming potential for measurement of electric charges of polymeric membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 116:149-159.
24. Nyström M., Lindström M., Matthiasson E. Streaming potential as a tool in the characterization of ultrafiltration membranes. Colloids. Surf. 1989, 36:297-312.
25. Limousy L., Mahzoul H., Hamon L., Siffert B. Determination by zetametry and 'streaming induced potential' measurements of the amounts of catalytic precursors necessary to saturate a support. Colloids. Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2001, 181:91-97.
26. Hubbe M.A., Wu N., Rojas O.J., Park S. Permeation of a cationic polyelectrolyte into mesoporous silica. Part 2. Effects of time and pore size on streaming potential. Colloids. Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2010, 364:7-15.
27. Duval J.F.L., Küttner D., Nitschke M., Werner C., Zimmermann R. Interrelations between charging, structure and electrokinetics of nanometric polyelectrolyte films. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2011, 362:439-449.
28. Déon S., Escoda A., Fievet P. A transport model considering charge adsorption inside pores to describe salts rejection by nanofiltration membranes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66:2823-2832.
29. Escoda A., Fievet P., Lakard S., Szymczyk A., Déon S. Influence of salts on the rejection of polyethyleneglycol by an NF organic membrane: pore swelling and salting-out effects. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 347:174-182.
30. Dutournié P., Limousy L., Déon S., Bourseau P. Unsteady transport of divalent salt through a mineral membrane of ultrafiltration: numerical estimation of physical parameters. Desalination 2011, 265:184-189.
31. Möckel D., Staude E., Dal-Cin M., Darcovich K., Guiver M. Tangential flow streaming potential measurements: hydrodynamic cell characterization and zeta potentials of carboxylated polysulfone membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 145:211-222.
32. Yaroshchuk A.E., Ribitsch V. The uses of non-steady-state membrane characterisation techniques for the study of transport properties of active layers of nanofiltration membranes: theory with experimental examples. Chem. Eng. J. 2000, 80:203-214.
33. Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 119:253-268.
34. Hunter R.J. Zeta Potential in Colloid Science. Principles and Applications 1981, Academic Press, New York.
35. Fievet P., Sbai M., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A. Determining the [zeta]-potential of plane membranes from tangential streaming potential measurements: effect of the membrane body conductance. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 226:227-236.
36. Yaroshchuk A., Ribitsch V. Role of channel wall conductance in the determination of z-potential from electrokinetic measurements. Langmuir 2002, 18:2036-2038.
37. Afonso M.D., Hagmeyer G., Gimbel R. Streaming potential measurements to assess the variation of nanofiltration membranes surface charge with the concentration of salt solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2001, 22-23:529-541.
38. Wang M., Wu L.-G., Zheng X.-C., Mo J.-X., Gao C.-J. Surface modification of phenolphthalein poly(ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membranes by blending with acrylonitrile-based copolymer containing ionic groups for imparting surface electrical properties. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2006, 300:286-292.
39. Sbai M., Szymczyk A., Fievet P., Sorin A., Vidonne A., Pellet-Rostaing S., Favre-Reguillon A., Lemaire M. Influence of the membrane pore conductance on tangential streaming potential. Langmuir 2003, 19:8867-8871.
40. Erickson D., Li D., Werner C. An improved method of determining the zeta-potential and surface conductance. J. Colloids. Interf. Sci. 2000, 232:186-197.
41. Schweiss R., Welzel P.B., Werner C., Knoll W. Dissociation of surface functional groups and preferential adsorption of ions on self-assembled monolayers assessed by streaming potential and streaming current measurements. Langmuir 2001, 17:4304-4311.
42. Werner C., Zimmermann R., Kratzmüller T. Streaming potential and streaming current measurements at planar solid/liquid interfaces for simultaneous determination of zeta potential and surface conductivity. Colloids. Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2001, 192:205-213.
43. Zhang H., Werner U. Characterization of surface change properties of synthetic microfiltration membranes by means of a streaming current method. Desalination 1990, 79:271-281.
44. Yaroshchuk A., Luxbacher T. Interpretation of electrokinetic measurements with porous films: role of electric conductance and streaming current within porous structure. Langmuir 2010, 26:10882-10889.
45. Ariza M.J., Benavente J., Rodriguez-Castellòn E., Palacio L. Effect of hydration of polyamide membranes on the surface electrokinetic parameters: surface characterization by x-ray photoelectronic spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy. J. Colloids. Interf. Sci. 2002, 247:149-158.
46. Werner C., Körber H., Zimmermann R., Dukhin S., Jacobasch H.-J. Extended electrokinetic characterization of flat solid surfaces. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 1998, 208:329-346.
47. Fievet P., Sbaï M., Szymczyk A., Magnenet C., Labbez C., Vidonne A. A new tangential streaming potential setup for the electrokinetic characterization of tubular membranes. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2004, 39:2931-2949.
48. Xie H., Saito T., Hickner M.A. Zeta potential of ion-conductive membranes by streaming current measurements. Langmuir 2011, 27:4721-4727.
49. Cho D., Lee S., Frey M.W. Characterizing zeta potential of functional nanofibers in a microfluidic device. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2012, 372:252-260.
50. Hurwitz G., Guillen G.R., Hoek E.M.V. Probing polyamide membrane surface charge, zeta potential, wettability, and hydrophilicity with contact angle measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 349:349-357.
51. Singh P.S., Rao A.P., Ray P., Bhattacharya A., Singh K., Saha N.K., Reddy A.V.R. Techniques for characterization of polyamide thin film composite membranes. Desalination 2011, 282:78-86.
52. Blank R., Muth K.-H., Proske-Gerhards S., Eberhard S. Electrokinetic investigations of charged porous membranes. Colloids. Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1998, 140:3-11.
53. Cañas A., Ariza M.J., Benavente J. Characterization of active and porous sublayers of a composite reverse osmosis membrane by impedance spectroscopy, streaming and membrane potentials, salt diffusion and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 183:135-146.
54. Buksek H., Luxbacher T., Petrinic I. Zeta potential determination of polymeric materials using two differently designed measuring cells of an electrokinetic analyzer. Acta Chim. Slov. 2010, 57:700-706.