Characterization of cleaning results using combined flux and streaming potential methods

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 131, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 195-205

  Nyström, Marianne ^a   Zhu, Huihua ^a  

^a LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Characterization; Cleaning; Detergent; Streaming potential; Ultrafiltration membranes

Indexed keywords

AGENTS; DETERGENTS; FLUORINE CONTAINING POLYMERS; FOULING; POLYSULFONES; SURFACE CLEANING; ULTRAFILTRATION;

CHARGE CHARACTERIZATION METHOD; STREAMING POTENTIAL; ZETA POTENTIAL;

POLYMERIC MEMBRANES;

BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN; POLYSULFONE;

ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CLEANING; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HYDROPHILICITY; INDUSTRY; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031556191     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00053-7     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. G. Trägårdh, Membrane cleaning, Desalination, 71 (1989) 325.
2. S. Ebrahim, Cleaning and regeneration of membranes in desalination and wastewater applications: State-of-the-art, Desalination, 96 (1994) 225-238.
3. M. Bartlett, M.R. Bird and J.A. Howell, An experimental study for the development of a qualitative membrane cleaning model, J. Membrane Sci., 105 (1995) 147-157.
4. J.L. Siler, A comparison of reverse osmosis membrane cleaning methods (u), DE 93004536 (WSRC-RP-92-056) Report, 1992, p. 8.
5. R. Kerbage, M. Mietton-Peuchot and R. Ben Aim, Evaluation de l'efficacite de nettoyage des membranes par la mesure de distribution de pores actifs, Recents Prog. Genie Procedes (15 Procedes Sep.), 5 (1991) 61-66.
6. M.J. Munoz-Aguado, D.E. Wiley and A.G. Fane, Optimal cleaning conditions for proteinaceous membrane foulants, Proc. Euromembrane'95, Bath, England, II-79-II-82.
7. K.J. Kim and A.G. Fane, Performance evaluation of surface hydrophilized novel ultrafiltration membranes using aqueous proteins, J. Membrane Sci., 99 (1995) 149-162.
8. G. Salazar, M.A. Argüello, F.A. Riera, R. Alvarez, J.P. Labbé and A. Quémerais, Chemical cleaning of inorganic membranes: Rinsing and acid steps, Proc. Euromembrane'95, Bath, England, II-87-II-90.
9. M.A. Argüello, G. Salazar, F.A. Riera, R. Alvarez, S. Bouhallab, G. Daufin, A. Quémerais and J.P. Labbé, Enzymatic cleaning of inorganic membranes, Proc. Euromembrane'95, Bath, England, II-55-II-58.
10. E.P. Jacobs, P. Swart, C.J. Brouchaert and O.O. Hart, membrane performance restoration. I: Abattoir process streams, cleaning regimes for UF-membranes, Water SA, 19:2(1993) 127-132.
11. K. Scott, A. Adhamy, W. Atteck and C. Davidson, Crossflow microfiltration of organic/water suspensions, Wat. Res., 28(1) (1994) 137-145.
12. G. Jonsson and P.L. Johansen, Selectivity of ultrafiltration membranes: Influence of fouling and cleaning conditions, Membr. Proc. Indo-EC Workshop 1991, pp. 165-184.
13. K.J. Kim, P. Sun, V. Chen, D.E. Wiley and A.G. Fane, The cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes fouled by proteins, J. Membrane Sci., 80 (1993) 241.
14. F.F. Stengaard, Characteristics and performance of new types of ultrafiltration membranes with chemically modified surfaces, Desalination, 70 (1988) 207-224.
15. M. Nyström, A. Pihlajamäki and N. Ehsani, Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by simultaneous streaming potential and flux measurements, J. Membrane Sci., 87 (1994) 245-256.
16. H. Zhu and M. Nyström, Cleaning results characterized with flux, streaming potential and FTIR measurements, Colloids Surf., in press.