The streaming potential method for the characterization of ultrafiltration organic membranes and the control of cleaning treatments

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 129, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 125-133

  Pontie M ^a   Chasseray, X ^a   Lemordant, D ^a   Laine J M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

^b Ctr Intl Rech Sur l'Eau l'E   (France)

Author keywords

Cleaning procedures; Contact angle; Isoelectric point; Neutral surfactant adsorption; Streaming potential; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; CELLULOSE; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CLEANING; CONTACT ANGLE; IONIC STRENGTH; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; PH EFFECTS; POLYSULFONES; PRESSURE EFFECTS; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

CELLULOSE ACETATE; ISOELECTRIC POINT; POLYETHERSULFONES; STREAMING POTENTIAL;

POLYMERIC MEMBRANES;

CELLULOSE ACETATE; POLYETHER DERIVATIVE; POLYSULFONE; SURFACTANT;

MEMBRANES-ORGANIC; PERMEABILITY; ULTRAFILTRATION;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; IONIC STRENGTH; ISOELECTRIC POINT; MEMBRANE FILTER; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE CHARGE; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 0343811732     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00340-7     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. H.P. Gregor and C.D. Gregor, Les applications des membranes synthétiques, Pour la science, 11 (1978) 73.
2. R.J. Hunter, Foundations of Colloid Science, Vol.1, Oxford Science, Oxford, 1991, p.316.
3. P.G. Barton, The influence of surface charge density of phosphatides on the binding of some cations, J. Biol. Chem., 243(14) (1968) 3884.
4. A.G. Fane, C.J.D. Fell and A. Suki, The effect of pH and ionic environment on the UF of protein solutions with retentive membranes, J. Membrane Sci., 16 (1983) 195.
5. (a) M. Rosch, in M.J. Schick (Ed.), Configuration of the polyethoxylene chain in bulk, Nonionic Surfactants, Vol.1, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1967, p.753;
6. (b) E.B. Grieves, D. Bhattacharya, V.G. Schomp, J.L. Bewley, Membrane ultrafiltration of a non-ionic surfactant AIChE. J., 19(1973) 766.
7. A.K. Zander, C. Cleveland and K. Curry, Measurement of membranes surface hydrophobicity and charge as affected by solution characteristics, J. AWWA, Reno, Nevada (1995) 609.
8. D. Elzo, Etude théorique et expérimentale de l'adhésion de particulate de taille micronique sur une surface plane Thése INPT Toulouse, 1994, p.198.
9. S.S. Dukhin and B.W. Derjaguin, Surface and Colloïd Science, Vol. 7, Wiley, New York, 1974, p.118.
10. I. Baudin, Intéraction polymére hydrosolubles/particules: rôle dans le phénoméne de colmatage de membraens d'UF utilisées pour la production d'eau potable Thése Paris VI, 1991, p.219.
11. I. Issid, Etude des intéractions membrane-soluté-surfactif: application à !'ultrafiltration assistée par les surfactifs Thése Paris VI, 1992, p.150.
12. H.J. Modi and D.W. Fuerstenu, Streaming potential studies on corundum in aqueous solution of inorganic electrolytes, J. Phys. Chem., 61 (1957) 640.
13. 3, J. Coll. Interface Sci., 43(2) (1973) 409.
14. D.W. Fuerstenu, Interfacial processes in mineral/water systems, Min. Eng., 8 (1956) 834.
15. M. Nyströms, M. Lindström and E. Matthiasson, Streaming potentials as a tool in the characterization of ultrafiltration, Membranes Coll. Surf., 36 (1989) 297.
16. W.H. Koh and J.L. Anderson, Electro-osmosis and electrolyte conductance in charged microcapillaries, AiChE J., 21(6) (1975) 1176.
17. J.L. Anderson and W.H. Koh, Electrokinetic parameters for capillaries of different geometries, J. Coll. Interface Sci., 59 (1977) 149.
18. H.U. Demish and W. Push, Electrical and electro-osmotic transport behaviour of asymmetric cellulose acetate membranes, J. Coll. Interface Sci., 76(1980).
19. G.B. Westermann-Clark and J.L. Anderson, Experimental verification of the space-charge model for electrokinetics in charged microporous membrane, J. Electron. Soc., Electrochemical Science and Technology, (1983)839.
20. J. Benavente and C. Fernandez-Pineda, Electrokinetic phenomena in porous membranes: determination of phenomenological coefficient and transport numbers, J. Membrane Sci., 23 (1985) 121.
21. A. Hemandez, J.I. Calvo, L. Martinez, J.A. Ibanez and F. Tejerina, Measurement of the hydraulic permeability of miocroporous membranes from the streaming potential decay, Sep. Sci. and Tech., 26(12) (1991) 1507.
22. V. Sasidhar and E. Ruckenstein, Electrolyte-Osmosis through capillaries, J. Coll. Interface Sci., 82(2) (1981) 439.
23. G. Tanny, E. Hoffer and O. Kedem, Streaming potentias during Hyperfiltration, Experientia Suppli, 18 (1971) 619.
24. M. Von Schmolukovsky, Bull. Acad. Sci., Cracovie, (1903)182.
25. M. Von Schmolukovsky, Z. Physis. Chem., 93 (1918) 129.
26. R.J. Hunter, Zeta-potential in colloïd Science, Academic Press New York, 1981.
27. M. Pontié, I. Issid, X. Chasseray, D. Lemordant Caractérisation de membranes d'UF par la mesure du potential d'écoulement Journées d'electrochimie 95; Strasbourg (1995) CO6-3.
28. P. Aptel, Membranes d'ultrafiltration: une avancée technologique dans le traitment de l'eau potable - Agence de Bassin Adour-Garonne, 44(1989) 14.
29. C. Anselme, C. Cabassud and M.R. Chevalier, lére applications industrielles d'UF par membranes; l'exemple d'Amon-court et de Doucay JIE Potiers sept.,(1990)T1 13-1/13-13.
30. J.M. Lainé, J.P. Hagstrom, C. Mark and J. Mallevialle, Effects of UF membrane composition, J. AWWA (1989)61.
31. J.L. Bersillon, C. Anselme, J. Mallevialle, P. Aptel and F. Fiessinger, L'UF applicable au traitment de l'eau potable: le cas d'un petit system L'Eau l'Industrie, les Nuisances, 130(1995)61.
32. M.J. Rosa and De Pinho, Separation of organic solutes by membranes pressure-driven processes, J. Membrane Sci., 89 (1994) 235.
33. C. Causserand, Etude des mécanismes de sélectivité d'une membrane d'ultrafiltration Thése Toulouse, 1992, p.210.
34. Z. Broz and N. Epstein, Electrokinetic flow through media composed of fine cylindrical capillaries, J. Coll. Interface Sci., 56 (1976) 605.
35. P.C. Hiemenz, Principal of colloïd interface Science. 2nd edn, Marcel Dekker, Paris, 1986.
36. J. N. Israelachvili, International and surface forces, Academic Press, London NW, 1985, (2nd edn, 1991).
37. M. Tasaka, S. Tamura, N. Takemura and K. Morimoto, Concentration dependence of electro-osmosis and streaming potential across charged membranes, J. Membrane Sci., 12 (1982) 169.
38. Probstein, Physicochemical Hydrodynamics - An Introduction, Butterworth (Ed.), Boston, 1989.
39. Ding Pinggao, Etude des propriétés physico-chimiques de membranes d'ultrafiltration chargées par des méthodes transitoires, Théses Université Claude-Bernard, 1991, p.116.
40. T Cserfalvi, T Meisel and E. Pungor, Determination of the electrokinetic potential dispersed and macromolecules colloïds by means of streaming potential measurements II, J. Electrochemical Chem., 74 (1976) 377.
41. H.R. Kruyt, Colloïd Science, Vol. 1, Elesevier, Amsterdam, 1952.
42. P. Block and Co, Catalogue Polyabo, 1991, p.607.
43. P.W. Atkins, Physical Chemistry, 3rd edn., Oxford Student edition, 1986.
44. V. Turco liveri, G. Cavallaro and G. Calor Giammona, Calorimetric investigation of the complex formation between surfactants and α-β and γ cyclodextrins. Thermal Anal., 199(1992) 125.
45. X. Chasseray, S. Lo and D. Lemordant, Complexation of (L)-alanine β-napthylamide Hydrobromide with methyl-β-cyclodextrin; an ultrafiltration study, J. Incl. Phen. Mol Recogn. Chem., (1996) 1-10.
46. D. Jezequal, A. Mayaffra and R Letellier, Etude potentiometrique de la stabilité de complexes tensio-actifs β-cyclodextrines, Can J. Chem., 69(12) (1991) 1865.