Evolutionarily stable consumer home range size in relation to resource demography and consumer spatial organization

Theoretical Ecology

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 567-589

  Barraquand, Frederic ^a,b,d   Murrell, David John ^c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

Adaptive dynamics; Foraging; Home range; Resource dispersion; Spatial segregation; Territory

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; DEMOGRAPHY; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; HOME RANGE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RANGE SIZE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TERRITORY;

EID: 84867741185     PISSN: 18741738     EISSN: 18741746     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12080-011-0148-7     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Adams E (2001) Approaches to the study of territory size and shape. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 32(1): 277-303.
2. Andersson M (1981) Central place foraging in the whinchat, Saxicola rubetra. Ecology 62(3): 538-544.
3. Arditi R, Tyutyunov Y, Morgulis A, Govorukhin V, Senina I (2001) Directed movement of predators and the emergence of density-dependence in predator-prey models. Theor Popul Biol 59(3): 207-221.
4. Blackwell P (1997) Random diffusion models for animal movement. Ecol Model 100(1-3): 87-102.
5. Bolker B, Pacala S (1997) Using moment equations to understand stochastically driven spatial pattern formation in ecological systems. Theor Popul Biol 52(3): 179-197.
6. Bonal R, Aparicio J (2008) Evidence of prey depletion around lesser kestrel Falco naumanni colonies and its short term negative consequences. J Avian Biol 39(2): 189-197.
7. Boots M (1999) 'Small worlds' and the evolution of virulence: infection occurs locally and at a distance. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 266(1432): 1933-1938.
8. Borger L, Dalziel B, Fryxell J (2008) Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. Ecol Lett 11(6): 637-650.
9. Borger L, Franconi N, Ferretti F, Meschi F, Michele G, Gantz A, Coulson T (2006) An integrated approach to identify spatiotemporal and individual-level determinants of animal home range size. Am Nat 168(4): 471-485.
10. Both C, Visser M (2003) Density dependence, territoriality, and divisibility of resources: from optimality models to population processes. Am Nat 161(2): 326-336.
11. Bowman J (2003) Is dispersal distance of birds proportional to territory size? Can J Zool 81(2): 195-202.
12. Bowman J, Jaeger J, Fahrig L (2002) Dispersal distance of mammals is proportional to home range size. Ecology 83(7): 2049-2055.
13. Briggs C, Hoopes M (2004) Stabilizing effects in spatial parasitoid-host and predator-prey models: a review. Theor Popul Biol 65(3): 299-315.
14. Buckley N, Ruxton G (2003) The resource dispersion hypothesis and the 'future value' of food. Trends Ecol Evol 18(8): 379.
15. Burt W (1943) Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. J Mammal 24(3): 346-352.
16. Carbone C, Gittleman J (2002) A common rule for the scaling of carnivore density. Science 295(5563): 2273.
17. Carpenter F (1987) Food abundance and territoriality: to defend or not to defend? Am Zool 27(2): 387-399.
18. de Roos A, McCauley E, Wilson W (1991) Mobility versus density-limited predator-prey dynamics on different spatial scales. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 246(1316): 117-122.
19. de Roos A, McCauley E, Wilson W (1998) Pattern formation and the spatial scale of interaction between predators and their prey. Theor Popul Biol 53(2): 108-130.
20. Dieckmann U, Law R (2000) Relaxation projections and the method of moments. In: Dieckmann U, Law R, Metz JAJ (eds) The geometry of ecological interactions: symplifying spatial complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 412-455.
21. Eide N, Jepsen J, Prestrud P (2004) Spatial organization of reproductive Arctic foxes Alopex lagopus: responses to changes in spatial and temporal availability of prey. J Anim Ecol 73(6): 1056-1068.
22. Elchuk C, Wiebe K (2003) Ephemeral food resources and high conspecific densities as factors explaining lack of feeding territories in Northern Flickers (Colaptes auratus). Auk 120(1): 187-193.
23. Ellner S (2001) Pair approximation for lattice models with multiple interaction scales. J Theor Biol 210(4): 435-447.
24. Eshel I (1983) Evolutionary and continuous stability* 1. J Theor Biol 103(1): 99-111.
25. Ferguson S, Taylor M, Born E, Rosing-Asvid A, Messier F (1999) Determinants of home range size for polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Ecol Lett 2(5): 311.
26. Geritz S, Kisdi E, Meszéna G, Metz J (1998) Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol Ecol 12: 35-57.
27. Gillespie D (2007) Stochastic simulation of chemical kinetics. Annu Rev Phys Chem 58: 35.
28. Gittleman J, Harvey P (1982) Carnivore home-range size, metabolic needs and ecology. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10(1): 57-63.
29. Grant J, Chapman C, Richardson K (1992) Defended versus undefended home range size of carnivores, ungulates and primates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31(3): 149-161.
30. Herfindal I, Linnell J, Odden J, Nilsen E, Andersen R (2005) Prey density, environmental productivity and home-range size in the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx). J Zool 265(01): 63-71.
31. Hosseini P (2003) How localized consumption stabilizes predator-prey systems with finite frequency of mixing. Am Nat 161(4): 567-585.
32. Huffaker C (1958) Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predatorprey interactions. Hilgardia 27: 343-383.
33. Ims R (1987) Responses in spatial organization and behaviour to manipulations of the food resource in the vole Clethrionomys rufocanus. J Anim Ecol 56(2): 585-596.
34. Jansen V, de Roos A (2000) The role of space in reducing predator-prey cycles. The geometry of ecological interactions: simplifying spatial complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 183-201.
35. Johnson D, Kays R, Blackwell P, Macdonald D (2002) Does the resource dispersion hypothesis explain group living? Trends Ecol Evol 17(12): 563-570.
36. Johnson D, Macdonald D, Kays R, Blackwell P (2003) Response to Revilla, and Buckley and Ruxton: the resource dispersion hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 18(8): 381-382.
37. Kacelnik A, Bateson M (1996) Risky theories-the effects of variance on foraging decisions. Integr Comp Biol 36(4): 402.
38. Kelt D, van Vuren D (2001) The ecology and macroecology of mammalian home range area. Am Nat 157(6): 637-645.
39. Korpimäki E, Norrdahl K (1991) Numerical and functional responses of kestrels, short-eared owls, and long-eared owls to vole densities. Ecology 72(3): 814-826.
40. Law R, Murrell D, Dieckmann U (2003) Population growth in space and time: spatial logistic equations. Ecology 84(1): 252-262.
41. Lima S (1998) Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions. Bioscience 48(1): 25-34.
42. López-Bao J, Palomares F, Rodríguez A, Delibes M (2010) Effects of food supplementation on home-range size, reproductive success, productivity and recruitment in a small population of Iberian lynx. Anim Conserv 13(1): 35-42.
43. Lopez-Sepulcre A, Kokko H (2005) Territorial defense, territory size, and population regulation. Am Nat 166(3): 317.
44. MacDonald D (1983) The ecology of carnivore social behaviour. Nature 301(5899): 379-384.
45. Macdonald D, Bacon P (1982) Fox society, contact rate and rabies epizootiology. Comp Immunol Microb 5(1-3): 247.
46. Mace G, Harvey P (1983) Energetic constraints on home-range size. Am Nat 121(1): 120-132.
47. Maher C, Lott D (1995) Definitions of territoriality used in the study of variation in vertebrate spacing systems. Anim Behav 49(6): 1581-1597.
48. Maher C, Lott D (2000) A review of ecological determinants of territoriality within vertebrate species. Am Midl Nat 143(1): 1-29.
49. Maynard-Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
50. McCauley E, Wilson W, de Roos A (1993) Dynamics of age-structured and spatially structured predator-prey interactions: individual-based models and population-level formulations. Am Nat 142(3): 412.
51. Mcloughlin P, Ferguson S, Messier F (2000) Intraspecific variation in home range overlap with habitat quality: a comparison among brown bear populations. Evol Ecol 14(1): 39-60.
52. McNab B (1963) Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size. Am Nat 97(894): 133.
53. Melbourne B, Chesson P (2005) Scaling up population dynamics: integrating theory and data. Oecologia 145(2): 178-186.
54. Mitchell M, Powell R (2004) A mechanistic home range model for optimal use of spatially distributed resources. Ecol Model 177(1-2): 209-232.
55. Mitchell M, Powell R (2007) Optimal use of resources structures home ranges and spatial distribution of black bears. Anim Behav 74(2): 219-230.
56. Moffitt E, Botsford L, Kaplan D, O'Farrell M (2009) Marine reserve networks for species that move within a home range. Ecol Appl 19(7): 1835-1847.
57. Moorcroft P, Lewis M (2006) Mechanistic home range analysis. Princeton University Press.
58. Moorcroft P, Lewis M, Crabtree R (2006) Mechanistic home range models capture spatial patterns and dynamics of coyote territories in Yellowstone. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 273(1594): 1651-1659.
59. Morrell L, Kokko H (2005) Bridging the gap between mechanistic and adaptive explanations of territory formation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57(4): 381-390.
60. Murrell D (2005) Local spatial structure and predator-prey dynamics: Counterintuitive effects of prey enrichment. Am Nat 166(3): 354-367.
61. Murrell D, Dieckmann U, Law R (2004) On moment closures for population dynamics in continuous space. J Theor Biol 229(3): 421-432.
62. Nicholls B, Racey P (2006) Contrasting home-range size and spatial partitioning in cryptic and sympatric pipistrelle bats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61(1): 131-142.
63. North A, Ovaskainen O (2007) Interactions between dispersal, competition, and landscape heterogeneity. Oikos 116(7): 1106-1119.
64. Orians G, Pearson N (1979) On the theory of central place foraging. Analysis of ecological systems. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, pp 154-177.
65. Ovaskainen O, Cornell S (2006) Space and stochasticity in population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(34): 12781.
66. Pinaud D, Weimerskirch H (2005) Scale-dependent habitat use in a long-ranging central place predator. J Anim Ecol 74(5): 852-863.
67. Richards S, Wilson W (2000) Adaptive feeding across environmental gradients and its effect on population dynamics. Theor Popul Biol 57(4): 377-390.
68. Schmidt K (2008) Behavioural and spatial adaptation of the Eurasian lynx to a decline in prey availability. Acta Theriol 53(1): 1-16.
69. Schoener T (1968) Sizes of feeding territories among birds. Ecology 49(1): 123-141.
70. Schoener T (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 2(1): 369-404.
71. Schoener T (1983) Simple models of optimal feeding-territory size: a reconciliation. Am Nat 121(5): 608-629.
72. Sih A (1984) The behavioral response race between predator and prey. Am Nat 123(1): 143-150.
73. Siniff D, Jessen C (1969) A simulation model of animal movement patterns. Adv Ecol Res 6: 185-219.
74. Stamps J, Buechner M (1985) The territorial defense hypothesis and the ecology of insular vertebrates. Q Rev Biol 60(2): 155-181.
75. Tilman D, Kareiva P (1997) Spatial ecology. Princeton UP.
76. Trewhella W, Harris S, McAllister F (1988) Dispersal distance, home-range size and population density in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes): a quantitative analysis. J Appl Ecol 25(2): 423-434.
77. van Baalen M (2000) Pair approximation for ecological interactions on different geometries. The geometry of ecological interactions: simplifying spatial complexities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 359-387.
78. van Baalen M, Rand D (1998) The unit of selection in viscous populations and the evolution of altruism. J Theor Biol 193(4): 631-648.
79. Van Moorter B, Visscher D, Benhamou S, Börger L, Boyce M, Gaillard J (2009) Memory keeps you at home: a mechanistic model for home range emergence. Oikos 118(5): 641-652.
80. Village A (1982) The home range and density of kestrels in relation to vole abundance. J Anim Ecol 51(2): 413-428.
81. Wauters L, Bertolino S, Adamo M, Dongen S, Tosi G (2005) Food shortage disrupts social organization: the case of red squirrels in conifer forests. Evol Ecol 19(4): 375-404.
82. Worton B (1987) A review of models of home range for animal movement. Ecol Model 38(3): 277-298.
83. Ydenberg R, Krebs J (1987) The tradeoff between territorial defense and foraging in the great tit (Parus major). Am Zool 27(2): 337-346.
84. Zabel C, McKelvey K, Ward Jr J (1995) Influence of primary prey on home-range size and habitat-use patterns of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina). Can J Zool 73(3): 433-439.
85. Zurbuchen A, Cheesman S, Klaiber J, Müller A, Hein S, Dorn S (2010) Long foraging distances impose high costs on offspring production in solitary bees. J Anim Ecol 79(3): 674-681.