Memory keeps you at home: A mechanistic model for home range emergence

Oikos

Volumn 118, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 641-652

  Van Moorter, Bram ^a,b   Visscher, Darcy ^c   Benhamou, Simon ^d   Börger, Luca ^e   Boyce, Mark S ^c   Gaillard, Jean Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^d CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; HOME RANGE; MOVEMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; RANDOM WALK METHOD;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 65449132068     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17003.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Anderson, D. P. et al. 2005. Factors influencing female home range sizes in elk (Cervus elaphus) in North American landscapes Landscape Ecol. 20 : 257 271. (Pubitemid 40886263)
2. Arvisais, M. et al. 2002. Home range and movements of a wood turtle (Clemmys insculpta) population at the northern limit of its range Can. J. Zool. 80 : 402 408. (Pubitemid 34519703)
3. Beecham, J. A. Farnsworth, K. D. 1998. Animal foraging from an individual perspective: an object orientated model Ecol. Modell. 113 : 141 156. (Pubitemid 29025938)
4. Bell, W. J. 1991. Searching behaviour. The behavioural ecology of finding resources. Animal behaviour series. Chapman and Hall.
5. Börger, L. et al. 2006. Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates J. Anim. Ecol. 75 : 1393 1405. (Pubitemid 44556461)
6. Börger, L. et al. 2008. Are there general mechanism of animal home range behavior? A review and prospects for future research Ecol. Lett. 11 : 637 650.
7. Bovet, P. Benhamou, S. 1988. Spatial analysis of animals' movements using a correlated random walk model J. Theor. Biol. 131 : 419 433.
8. Brown, M. F. et al. 1997. The existence and extent of spatial working memory ability in honeybees Anim. Learning Behav. 25 : 473 484. (Pubitemid 27527682)
9. Burnham, K. P. Anderson, D. R. 1998. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer.
10. Burt, W. H. 1943. Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals J. Mammal. 24 : 346 352.
11. Calenge, C. 2006. The package adehabitat for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals Ecol. Modell. 197 : 516 519. (Pubitemid 44108402)
12. Charnov, E. L. 1976. Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem Theor. Popul. Biol. 9 : 129 136.
13. Cooper, W. E. Jr. 1978. Home range criteria based on temporal stability of areal occupation J. Theor. Biol. 73 : 687 695. (Pubitemid 9012587)
14. Couzin, I. D. et al. 2002. Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups J. Theor. Biol. 218 : 1 11. (Pubitemid 35217564)
15. Crook, D. A. 2004. Is the home range concept compatible with the movements of two species of lowland river fish? J. Anim. Ecol. 73 : 353 366. (Pubitemid 38335189)
16. Crump, M. L. 1986. Homing and site fidelity in a Neotropical frog, Atelopus varius (Bufonidae) Copeia 1986 : 438 444.
17. Daugherty, C. H. Sheldon, A. L. 1982. Age-specific movement patterns of the frog Ascaphus truei Herpetologica 38 : 468 474.
18. Don, B. A. C. Rennolls, K. 1983. A home range model incorporating biological attraction points J. Anim. Ecol. 52 : 69 81.
19. Dumont, B. Hill, D. 2001. Multi-agent simulation of group foraging in sheep: effects of spatial memory, conspecific attraction and plot size Ecol. Modell. 141 : 201 215. (Pubitemid 32784268)
20. Fagan, W. et al. 2007. Population and community consequences of spatial subsidies derived from central-place foraging Am. Nat. 170 : 902 915. (Pubitemid 350211439)
21. Fieberg, J. 2006. Utilization distribution estimation using weighted kernel density estimators J. Wildlife Manage. 71 : 1669 1675.
22. Foerster, C. R. Vaughan, C. 2002. Home range, habitat use, and activity of Baird's tapir in Costa Rica Biotropica 34 : 423 437. (Pubitemid 36171637)
23. Folse, L. J. et al. 1989. AI modeling of animal movements in a heterogeneous habitat Ecol. Modell. 46 : 57 72. (Pubitemid 20422625)
24. Gautestad, A. O. Mysterud, I. 1993. Physical and biological mechanisma in animal movement processes J. Appl. Ecol. 30 : 523 535. (Pubitemid 24406893)
25. Gautestad, A. O. Mysterud, I. 1995. The home range ghost Oikos 74 : 195 204. (Pubitemid 3017871)
26. Gautestad, A. O. Mysterud, I. 2005. Intrinsic scaling complexity in animal dispersion and abundance Am. Nat. 165 : 44 55. (Pubitemid 40199536)
27. Greenwood, P. J. Harvey, P. H. 1982. The natal and breeding dispersal of birds Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13 : 1 21.
28. Harestad, A. S. Bunnell, F. L. 1979. Home range and body weight - a reevaluation Ecology 60 : 389 402.
29. Haydon, D. T. et al. 2008. Socially informed random walks: incorporating group dynamics into models of population spread and growth Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 275 : 1101 1109.
30. Heise, C. D. Epperson, D. M. 2005. Site fidelity and home range of relocated gopher tortoises in Mississippi Appl. Herpetol. 2 : 171 186.
31. Honig, W. K. 1978. Studies of working memory in the pigeon Hulse, S. H. Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 211 248.
32. Howery, L. D. et al. 1999. Impact of spatial memory on habitat use Grazing Behav. Livestock Wildlife 70 : 91 100.
33. Lam, L. 1995. Active walker models for complex systems Chaos Solitons Fractals 6 : 267 285.
34. Martinoli, A. et al. 2006. Recapture of ringed Eptesicus nilssonii (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) after 12 years: an example of high site fidelity Mammalia 70 : 333 335. (Pubitemid 47040725)
35. Millspaugh, Z. Z. et al. 2004. Comparability of three analytical techniques toassess joint space use Wildlife Soc. Bull. 32 : 148 157. (Pubitemid 38537040)
36. Mitchell, W. A. Lima, S. L. 2002. Predator-prey shell games: large-scale movement and its implications for decision-making by prey Oikos 99 : 249 259. (Pubitemid 35431610)
37. Mitchell, M. S. Powell, R. A. 2004. A mechanistic home range model for optimal use of spatially distributed resources Ecol. Modell. 177 : 209 232. (Pubitemid 38852256)
38. Mitchell, M. S. Powell, R. A. 2007. Optimal use of resources structures home ranges and spatial distribution of black bears Anim. Behav. 74 : 219 230. (Pubitemid 47247639)
39. Mooney, K. A. Haloin, J.R. 2005. Nest site fidelity of Paraphidippus aurantia (Salticidae) J. Arachnol. 34 : 241 243.
40. Moorcroft, P. R. Lewis, M. A. 2006. Mechanistic home range analysis. Princeton Univ. Press.
41. Moorcroft, P. R. et al. 1999. Home range analysis using a mechanistic home range model Ecology 80 : 1656 1665. (Pubitemid 29355301)
42. Pettersson, L. B. Brönmark, C. 1993. Trading off safety against food: state dependent habitat choice and foraging in crucian carp Oecologia 95 : 353 357.
43. Pontzer, H. 2007. Effective limb length and the scaling of locomotor cost in terrestrial animals J. Exp. Biol. 210 : 1752 1761. (Pubitemid 46953578)
44. Possingham, H. P. 1988. A model of resource renewal and depletion: applications to the distribution and abundance of nectar in flowers Theor. Popul. Biol. 33 : 138 160.
45. Possingham, H. P. Houston, A. I. 1990. Optimal patch use by a territorial forager J. Theor. Biol. 145 : 343 353. (Pubitemid 20255217)
46. Price, M. V. 1983. Ecological consequences of body size: a model for patch choice in desert rodents Oecologia 59 : 384 392. (Pubitemid 15275001)
47. Rhodes, J. R. et al. 2005. A spatially explicit habitat selection model incorporating home range behavior Ecology 86 : 1199 1205. (Pubitemid 40641194)
48. Rodríguez, M. A. 2002. Restricted movement in stream fish: the paradigm is incomplete, not lost Ecology 83 : 1 13. (Pubitemid 34067673)
49. Saïd, S. et al. 2005. Ecological correlates of home range size in spring-summer for female roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a deciduous woodland J. Zool. 267 : 301 308. (Pubitemid 41464527)
50. Schaefer, J. A. et al. 2000. Site fidelity of female caribou at multiple spatial scales Landscape Ecol. 15 : 731 739. (Pubitemid 32044941)
51. Shipley, L. A. et al. 1994. The scaling of intake rate in mammalian herbivores Am. Nat. 143 : 1055 1082. (Pubitemid 2108444)
52. Solow, A.R. 1990. A note on the statistical properties of animal locations J. Math. Biol. 29 : 189 193.
53. Spencer, S. R. et al. 1990. Operationally defining home range: temporal dependence exhibited by hispid cotton rats Ecology 71 : 1817 1822.
54. Stamps, J. A. Krishnan, V. V. 1999. A learning-based model of territory establishment Q. Rev. Biol. 74 : 291 318. (Pubitemid 29471641)
55. Stephens, D. W. Krebs, J. R. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton Univ. Press.
56. Switzer, P. V. 1997. Factors influencing the site fidelity of a territorial animal, Perithemis tenera Anim. Behav. 43 : 865 877. (Pubitemid 27204284)
57. Tan, Z.-J. et al. 2001. "True" self-attracting walk Phys. Lett. A 289 : 251 254.
58. Tan, Z.-J. et al. 2002. Random walk with memory enhancement and decay. Phys. Rev E 65. (Pubitemid 34631652)
59. Turchin, P. 1998. Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. Sinauer.
60. Wang, M. Grimm, V. 2007. Home range dynamics and population regulation: an individual-based model of the common shrew Sorex ayaneus Ecol. Modell. 205 : 397 409. (Pubitemid 46777087)
61. Wiens, J. A. 1979. On competition and variable environments Am. Sci. 65 : 590 597.
62. Weimerskirch, H. 2007. Are seabirds foraging for unpredictable resources? Deep-Sea Res. II 54 : 211 223. (Pubitemid 46428541)
63. White, G. W. Garrott, R. A. 1990. Analysis of wildlife radiotracking data. Academic Press.
64. Winter, Y. Stich, K.P. 2007. Foraging in a complex naturalistic environment: capacity of spatial working memory in flower bats J. Exp. Biol. 208 : 539 548. (Pubitemid 40307436)
65. Worton, B. J. 1995. Using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate kernel-based home range estimators J. Wildlife Manage. 59 : 794 800. (Pubitemid 26469993)