How localized consumption stabilizes predator-prey systems with finite frequency of mixing

American Naturalist

Volumn 161, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 567-585

  Hosseini, Parviez R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program   (United States)

Author keywords

IBM; Individual based models; Localized consumption; ODE; Predator; Predator prey dynamics; Prey; Space; Stability

Indexed keywords

INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; THEORY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION;

ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0037394242     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/368293     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adler, F. R., and M. Kretzschmar. 1992. Aggregation and stability in parasite-host models. Parasitology 104:199-205.
2. Bolker, B., and S. W. Pacala. 1997. Using moment equations to understand stochastically driven spatial pattern formation in ecological systems. Theoretical Population Biology 52:179-197.
3. Chesson, P. 2000. General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. Theoretical Population Biology 58:211-237.
4. Cuddington, K. M., and P. Yodzis. 2000. Diffusion-limited predator-prey dynamics in Euclidean environments: an allometric individual-based model. Theoretical Population Biology 58:259-278.
5. _. 2002. Predator-prey dynamics and movement in fractal environments. American Naturalist 160:119-134.
6. de Roos, A. M., E. McCauley, and W. G. Wilson. 1991. Mobility versus density-limited predator prey dynamics on different spatial scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 246:117-122.
7. _. 1998. Pattern formation and the spatial scale of interaction between predators and their prey. Theoretical Population Biology 53:108-130.
8. Donalson, D. D., and R. M. Nisbet. 1999. Population dynamics and spatial scale: effects of system size on population persistence. Ecology 80:2492-2507.
9. Durrett, R., and S. A. Levin. 1994a. The importance of being discrete (and spatial). Theoretical Population Biology 46:363-394.
10. _. 1994b. Stochastic spatial models: a user's guide to ecological applications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 343:329-350.
11. _. 2000. Lessons on pattern formation from planet WATOR. Journal of Theoretical Biology 205:201-214.
12. Ellner, S. P., E. McCauley, B. E. Kendall, C. J. Briggs, P. R. Hosseini, S. Wood, A. Janssen, et al. 2001. Habitat structure and population persistence in an experimental community. Nature 412:538-543.
13. Fussmann, G. F., S. P. Ellner, K. W. Shertzer, and N. G. Hairston. 2000. Crossing the Hopf bifurcation in a live predator-prey system. Science (Washington, D.C.) 290:1358-1360.
14. Gurney, W. S. C., and R. M. Nisbet. 1978. Predator-prey fluctuations in patchy environments. Journal of Animal Ecology 47:85-102.
15. _. 1998. Ecological dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York.
16. Gurney, W. S. C., and A. R. Veitch. 2000. Self-organization, scale and stability in a spatial predator-prey interaction. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 62:61-86.
17. Hanski, I. A. 1987. Coexistence of competitors in patchy environment with and without predation. Oikos 37:306-312.
18. Hassell, M. P., and R. M. May. 1973. Stability in insect host-parasite models. Journal of Animal Ecology 42:639-726.
19. Hassell, M. P., H. N. Comins, and R. M. May. 1991. Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics. Nature 353:255-258.
20. Huffaker, C. B. 1958. Experimental 'studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27:343-383.
21. Janssen, A., E. Van Gool, R. Lingeman, J. Jacas, and G. Van De Klashorst. 1997. Metapopulation dynamics of a persisting predator-prey system in the laboratory: time series analysis. Experimental & Applied Acarology 21:415-430.
22. Kareiva, P., and G. Odell. 1987. Swarms of predators exhibit prey taxis if individual predators use area-restricted search. American Naturalist 130:233-270.
23. Keeling, M. J., H. B. Wilson, and S. W. Pacala. 2000. Reinterpreting space, time lags, and functional responses in ecological models. Science (Washington, D.C.) 290:1758-1761.
24. Kretzschmar, M., and F. R. Adler. 1993. Aggregated distributions in models for patchy populations. Theoretical Population Biology 43:1-30.
25. Luckinbill, L. S. 1973. Coexistence in laboratory populations of Paramecium aurelia and its predator Didinium nasutum. Ecology 54:1320-1327.
26. McCauley, E., and W. W. Murdoch. 1987. Cyclic and stable populations: plankton as paradigm. American Naturalist 129:97-121.
27. McCauley, E., W. G. Wilson, and A. M. de Roos. 1993. Dynamics of age-structured and spatially structured predator-prey interactions: individual-based models and population-level formulations. American Naturalist 142:412-442
28. McCauley, E., R. M. Nisbet, W. W. Murdoch, A. M. de Roos, and W. S. C. Gurney. 1999. Large-amplitude cycles of Daphnia and its algal prey in enriched environments. Nature 402:653-656.
29. Murdoch, W. W. 1994. Population regulation in theory and practice. Ecology 75:271-287.
30. Murdoch, W. W., and A. Stewart-Oaten. 1989. Aggregation by parasitoids and predators: effects on equilibrium and stability. American Naturalist 134:288-310.
31. Nachman, G. 1981. Temporal and spatial dynamics of an acarine predator-prey system. Journal of Animal Ecology 50:435-451.
32. Nee, S., R. M. May, and M. P. Hassell. 1997. Two-species metapopulation models. Pages 123-147 in I. A. Hanski and M. E. Gilpin, eds. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
33. Nisbet, R. M., and W. S. C. Gurney. 1976. Simple mechanism for population cycles. Nature 263:319-320.
34. _. 1982. Modeling fluctuating populations. Wiley, Chichester.
35. Nisbet, R. M., S. Diehl, W. G. Wilson, S. D. Cooper, D. D. Donalson, and K. Kratz. 1997. Primary-productivity gradients and short-term population dynamics in open systems. Ecological Monographs 67:535-553.
36. Nisbet, R. M., A. M. de Roos, W. G. Wilson, and R. E. Snyder. 1998. Discrete consumers, small scale resource heterogeneity and population stability. Ecology Letters 1:34-37.
37. Pacala, S. W., M. P. Hassell, and R. M. May. 1990. Host-parasitoid-associations in patchy environments. Nature 344:150-153.
38. Pascual, M., and S. A. Levin. 1999. From individuals to population densities: searching for the intermediate scale of nontrivial determinism. Ecology 80:2225-2236.
39. Renshaw, E. 1991. Modeling biological populations in space and time. Cambridge studies in mathematical biology. Vol. 11. Cambridge University Press, New York.
40. Rohani, P., H. C. J. Godfray, and M. P. Hassell. 1994. Aggregation and the dynamics of host-parasitoid systems: a discrete-generation model with within-generation redistribution. American Naturalist 144:491-509.
41. Roughgarden, J. 1997. Production functions from ecological populations: a survey with emphasis on spatially implicit models. Pages 297-317 in D. Tilman and P. Kareiva, eds. Spatial ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
42. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1972. Enriched predator-prey systems: theoretical stability. Science (Washington, D.C.) 177:904.
43. Sudo, R., K. Kobayashi, and A. Shuichi. 1975. Some experiments and analysis of a predator-prey model: interaction between Copidium campylum and Alcaligenes faecalis in continuous and mixed culture. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 17:167-184.
44. Tsuchiya, H. M., J. F. Drake, J. L. Jost, and A. G. Fredrickson. 1972. Predator-prey interactions of Dictyostelium discoideum and Escherichia coli in continuous culture. Journal of Bacteriology 110:1147-1153.
45. Wilson, W. G. 1998. Resolving discrepancies between deterministic population models and individual-based simulations. American Naturalist 151:116-134.
46. Wood, S. N. 2001. Partially specified ecological models. Ecological Monographs 71:1-25.