Adaptive feeding across environmental gradients and its effect on population dynamics

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 377-390

  Richards, Shane A ^a,b   Wilson, William G ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adaptive dynamics; Environmental gradients; ESS; Foraging theory

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; FEEDING; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0033901418     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.2000.1464     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abrams P. A. Alternative models of character displacement and niche shift. 2. Displacement when there is competition for a single resource. Am. Nat. 30:1987;271-282.
2. Abrams P. A. The importance of frequency-dependent selection in modelling competitive coevolution. Evol. Ecol. 3:1989;215-220.
3. Abrams P. A. Adaptive foraging by predators as a cause of predator-prey cycles. Evol. Ecol. 6:1992;56-72.
4. Abrams P. A., Harada Y., Matsuda H. On the relationship between quantitative genetic and ESS models. Evolution. 47:1993;982-985.
5. Abrams P. A., Matsuda H. Fitness minimization and dynamic instability as a consequence of predator-prey coevolution. Evol. Ecol. 10:1996;167-186.
6. Brown J. S. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22:1988;37-47.
7. Brown J. S. Patch use under predation risk. I. Models and predictions. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 29:1992;301-309.
8. Charnov E. L. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor. Popul. Biol. 9:1976;129-136.
9. Christiansen F. B. On conditions for evolutionary stability for a continuously varying character. Am. Nat. 138:1991;37-57.
10. de Roos A. M. A gentle introduction to physiologically structured population models. Tuljapurkar S., Caswell H. Structured-Population Models in Marine, Terrestrial, and Freshwater Systems. 1997;119-204 Chapman & Hall, New York.
11. Dieckmann U. Can adaptive dynamics invade? Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:1997;128-131.
12. Eshel I. Evolutionary and continuous stability. J. Theor. Biol. 103:1983;99-111.
13. Geritz S. A. H., Kisdi É., Meszéna G., Metz J. A. J. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 12:1998;35-57.
14. Getz W. M. Population and evolutionary dynamics of consumer-resource systems. McGlade J. Advanced Ecological Theory: Principles and Applications. 1999;194-231 Blackwell Science, Oxford.
15. Grant B. R., Grant P. R. Evolutionary Dynamics of a Natural Population. 1989;Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
16. Laverty T. M., Plowright R. C. Competition between hummingbirds and bumble bees for nectar in flowers of Impatiens biflora. Oecologia. 66:1985;25-32.
17. Lawlor L. R., Maynard Smith J. The coevolution and stability of competing species. Am. Nat. 110:1976;79-99.
18. Lehman C. L., Tilman D. Competition in spatial habitats. Tilman D., Kareiva P. Spatial Ecology: The Role of Space in Population dynamics and Interspecific Interactions. Monographs in Population Biology. 30:1997;185-203 Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
19. Levins R. Evolution in Changing Environments. Monographs in Population Biology. 2:1968;Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
20. Lewontin R. C. Population Biology and Evolution. 1968;Syracuse Univ. Press, Syracuse.
21. MacArthur R. H. Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species. 1972;Harper & Row, New York.
22. Nisbet R. M., de Roos A. M., Wilson W. G., Snyder R. E. Discrete consumers, small scale resource heterogeneity, and population stability. Ecol. Lett. 1:1998;34-37.
23. Nisbet R. M., Diehl S., Wilson W. G., Cooper S. D., Donalson D. D., Kratz K. Primary-productivity gradients and short-term population dynamics in open systems. Ecol. Monogr. 76:1997;535-553.
24. Possingham H. P. The distribution and abundance of resources encountered by a forager. Am. Nat. 133:1989;42-60.
25. Richards S. A., Nisbet R. M., Wilson W. G., Possingham H. P. Grazers and diggers: Exploitation competition and coexistence among foragers with different feeding strategies on a single resource. Am. Nat. 155:2000;266-279.
26. Richards S. A., Wilson W. G., Socolar J. E. S. Selection for intermediate mortality and reproduction rates in a spatially-structured population. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 266:1999;2383-2388.
27. Rosenzweig M. L., MacArthur R. H. Graphical representation and stability conditions for predator-prey interactions. Am. Nat. 97:1963;209-223.
28. Roughgarden J. Production functions from ecological populations: A survey with emphasis on spatially implicit models. Tilman D., Kareiva P. Spatial Ecology: The Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions. Monographs in Population Biology. 30:1997;296-317 Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
29. Schmitt R. J. Exploitation competition in mobile grazers: Trade-offs in use of a limited resource. Ecology. 77:1996;408-425.
30. Taylor P. D. Evolutionary stability in one parameter models under weak selection. Theor. Popul. Biol. 36:1989;125-143.
31. Van Baalen M., Sabelis M. W. The milker-killer dilemma in spatially structured predator-prey interactions. Oikos. 73:1995;391-400.
32. Volterra V. Variations and fluctuations of the number of individuals in animal species living together. J. Cons. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer. 3:1928;3-51.
33. Wilson W. G., Osenberg C. W., Schmitt R. J., Nisbet R. M. Complementary foraging behaviors allow coexistence of two consumers. Ecology. 80:1999;2358-2372.
34. Wilson W. G., Richards S. A. Evolutionarily stable strategies for consuming a structured resource. Am. Nat. 155:2000;83-100.