Temporal variation in the selection on floral traits in Cyclopogon elatus (Orchidaceae)

Evolutionary Ecology

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1451-1468

  Benitez Vieyra, Santiago ^a   Glinos, Evangelina ^a   Medina, A Martín ^a   Cocucci, Andrea A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Drought stress; Floral fragrance; Orchidaceae; Osmophores; Phenotypic selection; Temporal variation in selection

Indexed keywords

BEE; DROUGHT STRESS; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; FLORAL TRAIT; FLOWERING; MONOCOTYLEDON; NATURAL SELECTION; NECTARY; ODOR; PHENOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; POLLINATOR; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; TEMPORAL VARIATION; TRADE-OFF;

APOIDEA; CYCLOPOGON ELATUS; ORCHIDACEAE;

EID: 84867676719     PISSN: 02697653     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10682-012-9565-3     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Ackerman JD (1983) Specificity and mutual dependency of the orchid-euglossine bee interaction. Biol J Linn Soc 20(3): 301-314.
2. Ackerman J, Meléndez-Ackerman E, Salguero-Faria J (1997) Variation in pollinator abundance and selection on fragrance phenotypes in an epiphytic orchid. Am J Bot 84(10): 1383-1390.
3. Alexandersson R, Johnson S (2002) Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Proc R Soc Lond B 269: 631-636.
4. Armbruster WS, Antonsen L, Pélabon C (2005) Phenotypic selection on Dalechampia blossoms: honest signalling affects pollination success. Ecology 86(12): 3323-3333.
5. Arnold S, Wade M (1984) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38(4): 709-719.
6. Benitez-Vieyra S, Medina A, Glinos E, Cocucci A (2006) Pollinator-mediated selection on floral traits and size of floral display in Cyclopogon elatus, a sweat bee-pollinated orchid. Funct Ecol 20(6): 948-957.
7. Benitez-Vieyra S, Ordano M, Fornoni J, Boege K, Domínguez CA (2010) Selection on signal-reward correlation: limits and opportunities to the evolution of deceit in Turnera ulmifolia L. J Evol Biol 23(12): 2760-2767.
8. Blarer A, Keasar T, Shmida A (2002) Possible mechanisms for the formation of flower size preferences by foraging bumblebees. Ethology 108(4): 341-351.
9. Blows M, Brooks R, Kraft P (2003) Exploring complex fitness surfaces: multiple ornamentation and polymorphism in male guppies. Evolution 57(7): 1622-1630.
10. Boberg E, Agren J (2009) Despite their apparent integration, spur length but not perianth size affects reproductive success in the moth-pollinated orchid Platanthera bifolia. Funct Ecol 23(5): 1022-1028.
11. Bolstad GH, Armbruster WS, Pélabon C, Pérez-Barrales R, Hansen TF (2010) Direct selection at the blossom level on floral reward by pollinators in a natural population of Dalechampia schottii: full-disclosure honesty? New Phytol 188(2): 370-384.
12. Brodie E III, Moore A, Janzen F (1995) Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol Evol 10(8): 313-318.
13. Canty A, Ripley B (2010) Boot: bootstrap R (S-Plus) functions. R package version 1. 2-43.
14. Caruso CM, Brook Peterson S, Ridley CE (2003) Natural selection on floral traits of Lobelia (Lobeliaceae): spatial and temporal variation. Am J Bot 90(9): 1333-1340.
15. Conner JK (1996) Understanding natural selection: an approach integrating selection gradients, multiplicative fitness components, and path analysis. Ethol Ecol Evol 8(4): 387-397.
16. Correa MN (1955) Las orquídeas argentinas de la tribu Polychondreae Schlechter subtribu Spiranthineae Pfitzer. Darwiniana 11: 24-88.
17. Darwin C (1862) On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects and on the good effects of intercrossing. John Murray, London.
18. Dixon PM (1993) The bootstrap and the jackknife: describing the precision of ecological indices. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 290-318.
19. Dukas R (2008) Evolutionary biology of insect learning. Ann Rev Entomol 53: 145-160.
20. Furrer R, Nychka D, Sain S (2010) Fields: tools for spatial data. R package version 6. 3.
21. Galen C (1999) Why do flowers vary? Bioscience 49(8): 631-640.
22. Galen C (2000) High and dry: drought stress, sex-allocation trade-offs, and selection on flower size in the Alpine wildflower Polemonium viscosum (Polemoniaceae). Am Nat 156(1): 72-83.
23. Galetto L, Bernardello LM, Rivera GL (1997) Nectar, nectaries, flower visitors, and breeding system in five terrestrial Orchidaceae from Central Argentina. J Plant Res 110(4): 393-403.
24. Gómez JM (2008) Sequential conflicting selection due to multispecific interactions triggers evolutionary trade-offs in a monocarpic herb. Evolution 62(3): 668-679.
25. Gómez JM, Zamora R (2006) Ecological factors that promote the evolution of generalization in pollination systems. In: Waser NM, Ollerton J (eds) Plant pollinator-interactions. From specialization to generalization. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 145-166.
26. Gómez JM, Bosch J, Perfectti F, Fernández JD, Abdelaziz M, Camacho JPM (2008) Association between floral traits and rewards in Erysimum mediohispanicum (Brassicaceae). Ann Bot 101(9): 1413-1420.
27. Green PJ, Silverman VW (1994) Nonparametric regression and generalised linear models. Chapman and Hall, London.
28. Gross J, Husband B, Stewart S (1998) Phenotypic selection in a natural population of Impatiens pallida Nutt. (Balsaminaceae). J Evol Biol 11(5): 589-609.
29. Harder LD, Johnson SD (2009) Darwin's beautiful contrivances: evolutionary and functional evidence for floral adaptation. New Phytol 183(3): 530-545.
30. Herrera C (1993) Selection on floral morphology and environmental determinants of fecundity in a hawk moth-pollinated violet. Ecol Monogr 63(3): 251-275.
31. Hodgins K, Barret S (2008) Natural selection on floral traits through male and female function in wild populations of the heterostylous daffodil Narcissus triandrus. Evolution 62(7): 1751-1763.
32. Jetter R (2006) Examination of the processes involved in the emission of scent volatiles from flowers. In: Dudareva N, Pichersky E (eds) Biology of floral scent. CRC/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 125-144.
33. Johnson S, Steiner K (1997) Long-tongued fly-pollination and evolution of floral spur length in the Disa draconis complex (Orcidaceae). Evolution 51(1): 45-53.
34. Kingsolver J, Hoekstra H, Hoekstra J, Berrigan D, Vignieri S, Hills C, Hoang A, Gibert P, Beerli P (2001) The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am Nat 157(3): 245-261.
35. Knudsen JT, Gershenzon J (2006) The chemical diversity of floral scent. In: Dudareva N, Pichersky E (eds) Biology of floral scent. CRC/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 125-144.
36. Lande R, Arnold S (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37(6): 1210-1226.
37. Lehrer M, Horridge GA, Zhang SW, Gadagkar R (1995) Shape vision in bees: innate preference for flower-like patterns. Philos T R Soc B 347(1320): 123-137.
38. Lunau K, Fieselmann G, Heuschen B, van de Loo A (2006) Visual targeting of components of floral colour patterns in flower-naïve bumblebees (Bombus terrestris; Apidae). Naturwissenschaften 93(7): 325-328.
39. Maad J, Alexandersson R (2004) Variable selection in Platanthera bifolia (Orchidaceae): phenotypic selection differed between sex functions in a drought year. J Evol Biol 17(3): 642-650.
40. Majetic CJ, Raguso RA, Ashman T (2009) The sweet smell of success: floral scent affects pollinator attraction and seed fitness in Hesperis matronalis. Func Ecol 23(3): 480-487.
41. Manly BFJ (2007) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
42. Mcglothlin J, Parker P, Nolan V, Ketterson E (2005) Correlational selection leads to genetic integration of body size and an attractive plumage trait in dark-eyed juncos. Evolution 59(3): 658-671.
43. Medel R, Botto-Mahan C, Kalin-Arroyo M (2003) Pollinator-mediated selection on the nectar guide phenotype in the Andean monkey flower, Mimulus luteus. Ecology 84(7): 1721-1732.
44. Mitchell-Olds T, Shaw R (1987) Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical inference and biological interpretations. Evolution 41(6): 1149-1161.
45. Miyake T, Yafuzo M (2003) Floral scents affect reproductive success in fly-pollinated Alocasia odora (Araceae). Am J Bot 90(3): 370-376.
46. Morrissey MB, Hadfield JD (2012) Directional selection in temporally replicated studies is remarkably consistent. Evolution 66(2): 435-442.
47. Nilsson L (1988) The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubes. Nature 334(6178): 147-149.
48. Ordano M, Fornoni J, Boege K, Domínguez C (2008) The adaptive value of phenotypic floral integration. New Phytol 179(4): 1183-1192.
49. R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
50. Raguso R (2008) Wake up and smell the roses: the ecology and evolution of floral scent. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39: 549-569.
51. Raine N, Chittka L (2007) The adaptive significance of sensory bias in a foraging context: floral colour preferences in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. PLoS ONE 2(6): e556.
52. Salzmann CC, Nardella AM, Cozzolino S, Schiestl FP (2007) Variability in floral scent in rewarding and deceptive orchids: the signature of pollinator-imposed selection? Ann Bot 100(4): 757-765.
53. Schemske D, Horovitz C (1989) Temporal variation in selection of a floral character. Evolution 43(2): 461-465.
54. Schiestl F (2005) On the success of a swindle: pollination by deception in orchids. Naturwissenchaften 92(6): 255-264.
55. Schiestl FP, Huber FK, Gomez JM (2011) Phenotypic selection on floral scent: trade-off between attraction and deterrence? Evol Ecol 25(2): 237-248.
56. Schluter D (1988) Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42(5): 849-861.
57. Siepielski AM, DiBattista JD, Carlson SM (2009) It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild. Ecol Lett 12(11): 1261-1276.
58. Singer RB, Cocucci AA (1999) Pollination mechanism in southern Brazilian orchids which are exclusively or mainly pollinated by halictid bees. Plant Syst Evol 217(1-2): 101-117.
59. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York.
60. Vogel S (1990) The role of scent glands in pollination. Smithsonian Institution Libraries/National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
61. Weiss M (1997) Innate colour preferences and flexible colour learning in the pipevine swallowtail. Anim Behav 53(5): 1043-1052.
62. Wiemer A, Moré M, Benitez-Vieyra S, Cocucci AA, Raguso R, Sérsic AN (2009) A simple floral fragrance and unusual osmophore structure in Cyclopogon elatus (Orchidaceae). Plant Biol 11(4): 506-514.
63. Wilson P (1995) Selection for pollination success and the mechanical fit of Impatiens flowers around bumblebee bodies. Biol J Linn Soc 55(4): 355-383.
64. Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Ratón.
65. Wood SN (2008) Fast stable direct fitting and smoothness selection for generalized additive models. J R Statist Soc B 70(3): 495-518.
66. Wright G, Schiestl F (2009) The evolution of floral scent: the influence of olfactory learning by insect pollinators on the honest signalling of floral rewards. Func Ecol 23(5): 841-851.