Perception of visual variables on tiled wall-sized displays for information visualization applications

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2516-2525

  Bezerianos, Anastasia ^a   Isenberg, Petra ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Information visualization; perception; wall displays

Indexed keywords

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS; DISTORTION EFFECTS; FREE MOTION; HIGH RESOLUTION; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; USER STUDY; VIEWING ANGLE; VIEWING DISTANCE; WALL-DISPLAYS; WALL-SIZED DISPLAYS;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; SENSORY PERCEPTION; VISUALIZATION;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84867665002     PISSN: 10772626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2012.251     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. D. J. Aks and J. T. Enns. Visual Search for Size is Influenced by a Background Texture Gradient. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(6):1467-1481, Dec. 1996. doi> 10.1037/0096-1523.22.6.1467 (Pubitemid 126420593)
2. F. Alallah, D. Jin, and P. Irani. Oa-Gaphs: Orientation Agnostic Graphs for Improving the Legibility of Charts on Horizontal Displays. In Proc. ITS, pp. 211-220. ACM, New York, 2010. doi> 10.1145/1936652. 1936692
3. C. Andrews, A. Endert, B. Yost, and C. North. Information Visualization on Large, High-resolution Displays: Issues, Challenges, and Opportunities. Information Visualization, 10(4):341-355, Oct. 2011. doi>10.1177/ 1473871611415997
4. R. Ball and C. North. Analysis of User Behavior on High-Resolution Tiled Displays. In Proc. INTERACT, volume 3585 of LNCS, pp. 350-363. Springer Verlag, Berlin / Heidelberg, 2005. doi> 10.1007/11555261 30
5. R. Ball and C. North. The Effects of Peripheral Vision and Physical Navigation on Large Scale Visualization. In Proc. Graphics Interface (GI), pp. 9-16. CIPS, Toronto, 2008.
6. R. Ball, C. North, and D. A. Bowman. Move to Improve: Promoting Physical Navigation to Increase User Performance with Large Displays. In Proc. CHI, pp. 191-200. ACM, New York, 2007. doi> 10.1145/1240624. 1240656 (Pubitemid 47581601)
7. M. Beaudouin-Lafon. Lessons Learned from the WILD Room, a Multisurface Interactive Environment. In Proc. IHM, pp. 18:1-18:8. ACM, New York, 2011. doi> 10.1145/2044354.2044376
8. A. Bezerianos. Using Alternative Views for Layout, Comparison and Context Switching Tasks in Wall Displays. In Proc. OZCHI, pp. 303- 310. ACM, New York, 2007. doi> 10.1145/1324892.1324956
9. A. Bezerianos and R. Balakrishnan. The Vacuum: Facilitating the Manipulation of Distant Objects. In Proc. CHI, pp. 361-370. ACM, New York, 2005. doi> 10.1145/1054972.1055023 (Pubitemid 41809073)
10. A. Bezerianos, P. Dragicevic, and R. Balakrishnan. Mnemonic Rendering: An Image-based Approach for Exposing Hidden Changes in Dynamic Displays. In Proc. UIST, pp. 159-168. ACM, New York, 2006. doi> 10.1145/1166253.1166279 (Pubitemid 47142437)
11. X. Bi, S.-H. Bae, and R. Balakrishnan. Effects of Interior Bezels of Tiled- Monitor Large Displays on Visual Search, Tunnel Steering, and Target Selection. In Proc. CHI, pp. 65-74. ACM, New York, 2010. doi> 10. 1145/1753326.1753337
12. W. S. Cleveland. The Elements of Graphing Data. Wadsworth Advanced Book Program, 1985.
13. W. S. Cleveland and R. McGill. Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387):531-554, Sept. 1984. doi> 10.2307/2288400
14. W. S. Cleveland and R. McGill. Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data. Science, 229(4716):828-833, Aug. 1985. doi> 10.1126/science.229.4716.828
15. M. Czerwinski, D. S. Tan, and G. G. Robertson. Women Take a Wider View. In Proc. CHI, pp. 195-202. ACM, New York, 2002. doi> 10.1145/ 503376.503412
16. A. Endert, C. Andrews, Y. H. Lee, and C. North. Visual Encodings that Support Physical Navigation on Large Displays. In Proc. GI, pp. 103- 110. CHCCS, Waterloo, Canada, 2011.
17. R. Fisher. The Force of Contraction of the Human Ciliary Muscle During Accommodation. Journal of Physiology, 270(1):51-74, Aug. 1977. (Pubitemid 8160773)
18. J. M. Foley. Depth, Size and Distance in Stereoscopic Vision. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 3(4):265-274, July 1968. doi> 10.3758/ BF03212742
19. M. Gleicher, D. Albers, R. Walker, I. Jusufi, C. D. Hansen, and J. C. Roberts. Visual Comparison for Information Visualization. Information Visualization, 10(4):289-309, Oct. 2011. doi> 10.1177/ 1473871611416549
20. E. B. Goldstein. Sensation and Perception. Brooks/Cole Publishing, Pacific Grove, USA, 5th edition, 1999.
21. M. Hancock, M. Nacenta, C. Gutwin, and S. Carpendale. The Effects of Changing Projection Geometry on the Interpretation of 3D Orientation on Tabletops. In Proc. ITS, pp. 157-164. ACM, New York, 2009. doi> 10.1145/1731903.1731934
22. C. Harrison and S. E. Hudson. A New Angle on Cheap LCDs: Making Positive Use of Optical Distortion. In Proc. UIST, pp. 537-540. ACM, New York, 2011. doi> 10.1145/2047196.2047266
23. P. Isenberg, A. Bezerianos, P. Dragicevic, and J.-D. Fekete. A Study on Dual-Scale Data Charts. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12):2469-2478, Nov./Dec. 2011. doi> 10.1109/ TVCG.2011.160
24. R. Jota, M. A. Nacenta, J. A. Jorge, S. Carpendale, and S. Greenberg. A Comparison of Ray Pointing Techniques for Very Large Displays. In Proc. Graphics Interface (GI), pp. 269-276. CIPS, Toronto, 2010.
25. A. Khan, J. Matejka, G. Fitzmaurice, and G. Kurtenbach. Spotlight: Directing Users' Attention on Large Displays. In Proc. CHI, pp. 791-798. ACM, New York, 2005. doi> 10.1145/1054972.1055082 (Pubitemid 41809115)
26. S. Kim, X. Cao, H. Zhang, and D. Tan. Enabling Concurrent Dual Views on Common LCD Screens. In Proc. CHI, pp. 2175-2184. ACM, New York, 2012. doi> 10.1145/2207676.2208369
27. R. Kruger, S. Carpendale, S. D. Scott, and S. Greenberg. Roles of Orientation in Tabletop Collaboration: Comprehension, Coordination and Communication. Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Work, 13(5-6):501-537, Dec. 2004. doi> 10.1007/s10606-004-5062-8 (Pubitemid 40226334)
28. R. Kruger, S. Carpendale, S. D. Scott, and A. Tang. Fluid Integration of Rotation and Translation. In Proc. CHI, pp. 601-610. ACM, New York, 2005. doi> 10.1145/1054972.1055055 (Pubitemid 41809097)
29. C. A. Levin and R. N. Haber. Visual Angle as a Determinant of Perceived Interobject Distance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 54(2):250- 259, Mar. 1993. doi> 10.3758/BF03211761
30. M. A. Nacenta, S. Sakurai, T. Yamaguchi, Y. Miki, Y. Itoh, Y. Kitamura, S. Subramanian, and C. Gutwin. E-conic: A Perspective-Aware Interface for Multi-Display Environments. In Proc. UIST, pp. 279-288. ACM, New York, 2007. doi> 10.1145/1294211.1294260 (Pubitemid 351429364)
31. E. Pietriga, S. Huot, M. Nancel, and R. Primet. Rapid Development of User Interfaces on Cluster-Driven Wall Displays with jBricks. In Proc. Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, pp. 185-190. ACM, New York, 2011. doi> 10.1145/1996461.1996518
32. F. H. Previc. Functional Specialization in the Lower and Upper Visual Fields in Humans: Its Ecological Origins and Neurophysiological Implications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(3):519-542, Sept. 1990. doi> 10.1017/S0140525X00080018
33. G. Shoemaker, A. Tang, and K. S. Booth. Shadow Reaching: A New Perspective on Interaction for Large Displays. In Proc. UIST, pp. 53-56. ACM, New York, 2007. doi> 10.1145/1294211.1294221 (Pubitemid 351429336)
34. S. S. Stevens. Psychophysics. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, USA, 2nd edition, 1975.
35. Stoney Brook University. Stony Brook University Receives NSF Grant to Design Revolutionary Reality Deck. Press Release, July 13 2010.
36. D. S. Tan, D. Gergle, P. Scupelli, and R. Pausch. With Similar Visual Angles, Larger Displays Improve Spatial Performance. In Proc. CHI, pp. 217-224. ACM, New York, 2003. doi> 10.1145/642611.642650
37. M. Wagner. The Geometries of Visual Space. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2006.
38. W. M. Wiest and B. Bell. Steven's Exponent for Psychophysical Scaling of Perceived, Remembered, and Inferred Distance. Psychological Bulletin, 98(3):457-470, Nov. 1985. doi> 10.1037/0033-2909.98.3.457
39. D. Wigdor, C. Shen, C. Forlines, and R. Balakrishnan. Perception of Elementary Graphical Elements in Tabletop and Multi-surface Environments. In Proc. CHI, pp. 473-482. ACM, New York, 2007. doi> 10. 1145/1240624.1240701 (Pubitemid 47581635)
40. B. Yost, Y. Haciahmetoglu, and C. North. Beyond Visual Acuity: The Perceptual Scalability of Information Visualizations for Large Displays. In Proc. CHI, pp. 101-110. ACM, New York, 2007. doi> 10.1145/1240624. 1240639 (Pubitemid 47581589)
41. B. Yost and C. North. The Perceptual Scalability of Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5):837-844, Sept./Oct. 2006. doi> 10.1109/TVCG.2006.184 (Pubitemid 44955611)