Information visualization on large,high-resolution displays: Issues, challenges, and opportunities

Information Visualization

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 341-355

  Andrews, Christopher ^a   Endert, Alex ^a   Yost, Beth ^a   North, Chris ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Information visualization; Interaction; LargeHigh resolution displays; Visualization design guidelines

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL DESIGN; DATA SETS; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; DESKTOP DISPLAYS; DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES; ENCODINGS; HIGH RESOLUTION DISPLAY; HUMAN ABILITIES; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; INTERACTION; INTERACTION TECHNIQUES; LARGE DISPLAYS; LARGEHIGH-RESOLUTION DISPLAYS; NEW DESIGN; TECHNICAL LIMITATIONS;

DESIGN; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PIXELS; SCALABILITY;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 80054872476     PISSN: 14738716     EISSN: 14738724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473871611415997     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Fekete JD and Plaisant C. Interactive information visualization of a million items. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis), IEEE Computer Society, Boston, MA, 2002; 117-124.
2. Huber P. Huge data sets. Compstat '94, Physica: Vienna, Austria, 1994; 3-13.
3. Ball R, North C and Bowman D. Move to improve: Promoting physical navigation to increase user performance with large displays. CHI 2007, ACM: San Jose, CA, 2007; 3: 191-200. (Pubitemid 47581601)
4. Yost B, Haciahmetoglu Y and North C. Beyond visual acuity: The perceptual scalability of information visualizations for large displays. CHI 2007. San Jose, CA: ACM, 2007, pp. 101-110. (Pubitemid 47581589)
5. Shupp L, et al. Shaping the display of the future: The effects of display size and curvature on user performance and insights. Hum Comput Interact 2009; 24(1): 230-272.
6. Ni T, Bowman D and Chen J. Increased display size and resolution improve task performance in information-rich virtual environments. Graph Interface. Canadian Information Processing Society, Canada: Quebec City, 2006, pp. 139-146. (Pubitemid 44386139)
7. Czerwinski M, Tan D and Robertson G. Women take a wider view. CHI '02. Minneapolis, MN: ACM, 2002, pp. 195-202.
8. Andrews C, Endert A and North C. Space to think: Large, high-resolution displays for sensemaking. CHI ACM, 2010; 55-64.
9. Tan DS, Gergle D, Scupelli P and Pausch R. Physically large displays improve performance on spatial tasks. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 2006; 13(1): 71-99. (Pubitemid 44076464)
10. Bi X and Balakrishnan R. Comparing usage of a large highresolution display to single or dual desktop displays for daily work. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM: Boston, MA, 2009; 1005-1014.
11. Ni T, et al. A survey of large high-resolution display technologies, techniques, and applications. IEEE Virtual Reality, IEEE Computer Society, Alexandria, VA, 2006; 223-234.
12. Ware C. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.
13. Eick SG and Karr AF. Visual scalability. J Comput Graph Stat 2002; 11(1): 22-43.
14. Swaminathan K and Sato S. Interaction design for large displays. Interactions 1997; 4(1): 15-24. (Pubitemid 127020765)
15. Ball R and North C. Effects of tiled high-resolution displays on basic visualization and navigation tasks. Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05), ACM: Portland, OR, 2005; 1196-1199.
16. Ball R, et al. Evaluating the benefits of tiled displays for navigating maps. IASTED-HCI '05, ACTA Press: Phoenix, AZ, 2005; 66-71.
17. Yost B and North C. The perceptual scalability of visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12(5): 837-844. (Pubitemid 44955611)
18. Polys N, Kim S and Bowman D. Effects of information layout, screen size, and field of view on user performance in information- rich virtual environments. Virtual Reality Software and Technology. Monetery, CA: ACM, 2005, pp. 46-55. (Pubitemid 44393886)
19. Endert A, Fink GA and North C. Visual analytics for cyber security: Observations and opportunities for large display workspaces. Technical Report, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, 2009.
20. Fink G, et al. Visualizing cyber security: Usable workspaces. VizSec, 2009.
21. Ball R and North C. An analysis of user behavior on high-resolution tiled displays. Tenth IFIP International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT 2005), ACM, 2005; 14.
22. Alphonse GA and Lubin J. Psychophysical requirements for tiled large screen displays. High-Resolution Displays and Projection Systems. San Jose, CA: SPIE, 1992, pp. 230-240. (Pubitemid 23611108)
23. Sawant AP and Healey CG. A Survey of Display Device Properties and Visual Acuity for Visualization. Raleigh: Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 2005.
24. Wigdor D, et al. Perception of elementary graphical elements in tabletop and multi-surface environments. CHI 2007. San Jose, CA: ACM, 2007, pp. 473-482. (Pubitemid 47581635)
25. Endert A, Andrews C and North C. Visual Encodings that Support Physical Navigation on Large Displays. Graphics Interface (GI), Canadian Information Processing Society, St. John's, NL, 2011.
26. Ware C. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. The Morgan Kaufmann series in interactive technologies. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman, 2000.
27. Mackinlay JD and Heer J. Wideband displays: Mitigating multiple monitor seams. Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM: Vienna, Austria, 2004; 1521-1524.
28. Mackinlay JD, et al. City lights: Contextual views in minimal space. Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 2003; 838-839.
29. Ebert A, et al. Tiled++: An enhanced tiled hi-res display wall. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2010; 16(1): 120-132.
30. Cleveland WS and McGill R. Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation and application to the development of graphical methods. J Am Stat Assoc 1984; 79(387): 531-554.
31. Mackinlay JD. Automating the design of graphical presentations. ACM Trans Graph 1986; 5(2): 110-141.
32. Tessendorf D, et al. An ordering of secondary task display attributes. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM: Minneapolis, MN, 2002; 600-601.
33. Furnas GW and Bederson BB. Space-scale diagrams: Understanding multiscale interfaces. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '95), ACM, Denver, Colorado, 1995; 234-241.
34. Inselberg A. The plane with parallel coordinates. Vis Comput 1985; 1: 69-91.
35. Vogt K, et al. Co-located collaborative sensemaking on a large, high-resolution display with multiple input devices. INTERACT 2011.
36. Sandstrom TA, Henze C and Levit C. The hyperwall. Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization (CMV). London: IEEE, 2003, pp. 124-133.
37. Stasko J, et al. Jigsaw: Supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization. Inform Visual 2008; 7(2): 118-132.
38. Yost B and North C. The perceptual scalability of visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph (Proceedings Visualization/ Information Visualization 2006) 2006; 12(5): 837-844. (Pubitemid 44955611)
39. Robinson AC. Design for Synthesis in Geovisualization. University Park: Pennsylvannia State University, 2008.
40. Shipman F, et al. Emergent structure in analytic workspaces: Design and use of the visual knowledge builder. Proceedings of IFIP INTERACT'01: Human-Computer Interaction, ACM, 2001; 132-139.
41. Robertson G, et al. The large-display user experience. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 2005; 25(4): 44-51. (Pubitemid 41046862)
42. Guimbretiere F, Stone M and Winograd T. Fluid interaction with high-resolution wall size displays. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM: Orlando, FL, 2001; 11-14.
43. Baudisch P. Interacting with large displays. IEEE Comput 2006; 39(3): 96-97.
44. Isenberg P and Carpendale S. Interactive tree comparison for co-located collaborative information visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13(6): 1232-1239. (Pubitemid 350076594)
45. Peck SM, North C and Bowman D. A multiscale interaction technique for large, high-resolution displays. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, IEEE Computer Society, Lafayette, Louisiana, 2009; 31-38.
46. Nowell L, Netzler E and Tanasse T. Change blindness in information visualization: A case study. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, IEEE, San Diego, California, 2001; 15-22. (Pubitemid 33099021)
47. Bartram L, Ware C and Calvert T. Filtering and integrating visual information with motion. Inform Visual 2002; 1(1): 66-79.
48. Baudisch P, et al. Phosphor: Explaining transitions in the user interface using afterglow effects. User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), ACM, Montreux, Switzerland, 2006.
49. Myers B, et al. Interacting at a distance: Measuring the performance of laser pointers and other devices. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2002; 33-40.
50. Cheng K and Pulo K. Direct interaction with large-scale display systems using infrared laser tracking devices. Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information Visualization, Australian Computer Society: Adelaide, Australia, 2003; 67-74.
51. Benko H, Wilson A and Baudisch P. Precise selection techniques for multi-touch screens. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM: Montreal, Canada, 2006; 1263-1272. (Pubitemid 44032225)
52. Bezerianos A and Balakrishnan R. The vacuum: Facilitating the manipulation of distant objects. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM: Portland, OR, 2005; 361-370. (Pubitemid 41809073)
53. Collomb M, et al. Improving drag-and-drop on wall-size displays. Graphics Interface (GI), Canadian Information Processing Society, Victoria, BC, 2005; 25-32. (Pubitemid 43211946)
54. Sabri A, et al. High-resolution gaming: Interfaces, notifications and the user experience. Interact Comput.
55. Buennemeyer T, et al. Intelligence analysis using high resolution displays. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI), Springer, San Diego, CA, 2006; 652-653. (Pubitemid 44045624)
56. Andrews C, et al. Cardtable: An embodied tool for analysis of historical information. IEEE Tabletop2007, 2007.
57. Dourish P. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.
58. Vogel D and Balakrishnan R. Distant freehand pointing and clicking on very large, high resolution displays. Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM: Seattle, WA, 2005; 33-42. (Pubitemid 44531219)
59. North C, et al. Understanding multi-touch manipulation for surface computing. Proceedings of the 12th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Part II, Springer-Verlag: Uppsala, Sweden, 2009; 236-249.