Visual comparison for information visualization

Information Visualization

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 289-309

  Gleicher, Michael ^a   Albers, Danielle ^a   Walker, Rick ^b   Jusufi, Ilir ^c   Hansen, Charles D ^d   Roberts, Jonathan C ^b  

^a University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparison; Survey; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

BUILDING BLOCKES; COMPARATIVE VISUALIZATION; COMPARISON; COMPLEX OBJECTS; ENCODINGS; FUTURE CHALLENGES; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; INITIAL EXPLORATION; VISUAL COMPARISON; VISUAL DESIGN;

DATA REDUCTION; DESIGN; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SURVEYS; TAXONOMIES; VISUALIZATION;

DATA VISUALIZATION;

EID: 80054848570     PISSN: 14738716     EISSN: 14738724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473871611416549     Document Type: Article

References (152)

1. Munzner T, Guimbretière F, Tasiran S, Zhang L and Zhou Y. Treejuxtaposer: Scalable tree comparison using focus+context with guaranteed visibility. ACM Trans Graph 2003; 22(3): 453-462.
2. Holten D and vanWijk JJ. Visual comparison of hierarchically organized data. Comput Graph Forum 2008; 27: 759-766.
3. Procter JB, Thompson J, Letunic I, Creevey C, Jossinet F and Barton GJ. Visualization of multiple alignments, phylogenies and gene family evolution. Nat Method 2010; 7(3 Suppl): S16-S25.
4. Kerren A, Plaisant C and Stasko JT. Information visualization. Schloss Dagstuhl Workshop June, 2010.
5. Roberts JC. State of the art: Coordinated & multiple views in exploratory visualization. CMV '07: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization 2007; 61-71. (Pubitemid 47515157)
6. Freire M. Visualizing program similarity in the Ac plagiarism detection system. Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI '08. ACM: New York, 2008; 404-407.
7. Meyer M, Munzner Tand Pfister H. Mizbee: A multiscale synteny browser. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15(6): 897-904.
8. Andrews K, Wohlfahrt M and Wurzinger G. Visual graph comparison. Proceedings of the 2009 13th International Conference Information Visualisation. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2009; 62-67.
9. Engels R, Yu T, Burge C, Mesirov JP, DeCaprio D and Galagan JE. Combo: A whole genome comparative browser. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2006; 22(14): 1782-1783. (Pubitemid 44288342)
10. White D and Joy M. Sentence-based natural language plagiarism detection. J Educ Resource Comput 2004; 4(4): 2-22.
11. Bendix F, Kosara R and Hauser H. Parallel sets: Visual analysis of categorical data. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005 2005; 133-140. (Pubitemid 44500048)
12. Huerta-Cepas J, Dopazo J and Gabaldon T. Ete: A python environment for tree exploration. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11(1): 24-30.
13. Mansmann F, Keim DA, North SC, Rexroad B and Sheleheda D. Visual analysis of network traffic for resource planning, interactive monitoring, and interpretation of security threats. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13(6): 1105-1112. (Pubitemid 350076578)
14. Jerding D and Stasko J. The information mural: A technique for displaying and navigating large information spaces. Proceedings of Visualization 1995 Conference 1995; 43-50.
15. Vrotsou K, Johansson J and Cooper M. ActiviTree: Interactive visual exploration of sequences in event-based data using graph similarity. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15(6): 945-952.
16. Amenta N and Klingner J. Case study: Visualizing sets of evolutionary trees. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, INFOVIS '02. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2002; 71-74.
17. Holten D. Hierarchical edge bundles: Visualization of adjacency relations in hierarchical data. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12: 741-748. (Pubitemid 44955599)
18. Graham M and Kennedy J. A survey of multiple tree visualisation. Information Visualization 2009.
19. Amar R and Stasko J. Best paper: A knowledge task-based framework for design and evaluation of information visualizations. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2004; 143-150.
20. Roth SF and Mattis J. Data characterization for intelligent graphics presentation. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Empowering People, CHI '90. ACM: New York, 1990; 193-200.
21. Wehrend S and Lewis C. A problem-oriented classification of visualization techniques. VIS '90: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Visualization '90. IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos, CA, 1990; 139-143.
22. Tory M and Moller T. Rethinking visualization: A high-level taxonomy. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2004; 151-158. (Pubitemid 40449140)
23. Shen Q, Pang A and Uselton S. Data level comparison of wind tunnel and computational fluid dynamics data. Visualization '98. Proceedings October 1998; 415-418.
24. Verma V and Pang A. Comparative flow visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2004; 10(6): 609-624. (Pubitemid 43095848)
25. Urness T, Interrante V, Longmire E, Marusic I, O'Neill S and Jones T. Strategies for the visualization of multiple 2D vector fields. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 2006; 26(4): 74-82. (Pubitemid 44070184)
26. Roberts JC. Exploratory visualization with multiple linked views. In: MacEachren A, Kraak MJ and Dykes J (eds) Exploring Geovisualization. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004.
27. Tufte ER. Beautiful Evidence. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press, 2006.
28. Farell B. 'Same' - 'different' judgements: A review of current controversies in perceptual comparison. Psychol Bull 1985; 98: 419-456.
29. Larsen A and Bundesen C. Effects of spatial separation in visual pattern matching: Evidence on the role of mental translation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1998; 24(3): 719-731. (Pubitemid 128457472)
30. Bair A and House D. Grid with a view: Optimal texturing for perception of layered surface shape. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13(6): 1656-1663. (Pubitemid 350076645)
31. Larsen A and Bundesen C. Size scaling in visual pattern recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1978; 4(1): 1-20.
32. Hyun JS, Woodman GF, Vogel EK, Hollingworth A and Luck SJ. The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2009; 35: 1140-1160.
33. Rensink RA. Change detection. Annu Rev Psychol 2002; 53(1): 245-277.
34. Franconeri SL. The nature and status of visual resources. Vis Resour, in press.
35. Mitroff SR, Simons D and Franconeri S. The siren song of implicit change detection. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2002; 28(4): 798-815.
36. Simons DJ, Franconeri SL and Reimer RL. Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruption. Perception 2000; 29: 1143-1154.
37. Simons DJ, Mitroff SR and Franconeri SL. Implicit and explicit representations in scene perception. In: Peterson MA and Rhodes G (eds) Perception of Faces, Objects, and Scenes: Analytic and Holistic Processes (Advances in Visual Cognition). Oxford University Press, 2003.
38. Keefe DF, Ewert M, Ribarsky W and Chang R. Interactive coordinated multiple-view visualization of biomechanical motion data. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2008; 15(6): 1383-1390.
39. Heer J and Robertson G. Animated transitions in statistical data graphics. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13(6): 1240-1247. (Pubitemid 350076595)
40. Alvarez GA and Franconeri SL. How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited tracking mechanism. J Vis 2007; 7(13): 1-10.
41. Franconeri SL, Jonathan S and Scimeca JM. Tracking multiple objects is limited only by object spacing, not speed, time, or capacity. Psychol Sci 2010; 21(7): 920-925.
42. Franconeri SL, Lin J, Pylyshyn ZW, Fisher B and Enns JT. Multiple object tracking is limited by crowding, but not speed. Psychonomic Bull Rev 2008; 15(4): 802-808.
43. Bertin J. Semiology of Graphics. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1983.
44. Lohse GL, Biolsi K, Walker N and Rueter HH. A classification of visual representations. Comm ACM 1994; 37(12): 36-49.
45. Tufte ER. Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press, 1990.
46. Namata GM, Staats B, Getoor L and Shneiderman B. A dual-view approach to interactive network visualization. Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM '07. ACM: New York, 2007; 939-942.
47. Lam H, Munzner T and Kincaid R. Overview use in multiple visual information resolution interfaces. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13(6): 1278-1285. (Pubitemid 350076600)
48. DiGirolamo G and Hintzman D. First impressions are lasting impressions: A primacy effect in memory for repetitions. Psychonomic Bull Rev 1997; 4: 121-124. (Pubitemid 127461354)
49. Nowell L, Hetzler E and Tanasse T. Change blindness in information visualization: A case study. INFOVIS '01: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2001 (INFOVIS'01). 2001; 15.
50. Rensink RA, Oregan JK and Clark JJ. On the failure to detect changes in scenes across brief interruptions. Vis Cognit 2000; 7(1/2/3): 127-145. (Pubitemid 30353625)
51. Scott-Brown KC, Baker MR and Orbach HS. Comparison blindness. Vis Cognit 2000; 7(1-3): 253-267. (Pubitemid 30353632)
52. Shapiro K. Change blindness: Theory or paradigm? Vis Cognit 2000; 7(1): 83-91. (Pubitemid 30353622)
53. Simons D and Levin D. Change blindness. Trends Cognit Sci 1997; 1(7): 261-267. (Pubitemid 127445455)
54. Tregelles SP (ed.) English Hexapla New Testament. Samuel Bagster and Sons, 1841.
55. Hunt JW and McIlroy MD. An Algorithm for Differential File Comparison. Technical Report 41, Computing Science Technical Report, Bell Laboratories, 1976.
56. Sutherland-Smith W and Carr R. Turnitin.com: Teachers' perspectives of antiplagiarism software in raising issues of educational integrity. J Univ Teach Learn Pract 2005; 2(3): 94-101.
57. Card SK, Robertson GG and York W. The webbook and the web forager: An information workspace for the world-wide web. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground, CHI '96. ACM: New York, 1996; 111-117.
58. Albers D, Dewey C and Gleicher M. Sequence surveyor: Leveraging overview for scalable genomic alignment visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph, (Proceedings Visualization/ Information Visualization 2011) 17(12).
59. Albers D, Dewey C and Gleicher M. Sequence surveyor: Scalable multiple sequence alignment overview visualization. VIZBI Workshop on Visualizing Biological Data Poster Session, 2011 March.
60. Shaw CD, Hall JA, Ebert DS and Roberts DA. Interactive lens visualization techniques. Proceedings of the Conference on Visualization '99: Celebrating Ten Years, VIS '99. IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos, CA, 1999; 155-160. (Pubitemid 30526305)
61. Collberg C, Kobourov S, Nagra J, Pitts J and Wampler K. A system for graph-based visualization of the evolution of software. Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Symposium on Software Visualization, SoftVis '03. ACM: New York, 2003; 77-86.
62. Jianu R, Yu K, Cao L, Nguyen V, Salomon AR and Laidlaw DH. Visual integration of quantitative proteomic data, pathways, and protein interactions. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2010; 16(4): 609-620.
63. Hagh-Shenas H, Kim S, Interrante V and Healey C. Weaving versus blending: A quantitative assessment of the information carrying capacities of two alternative methods for conveying multivariate data with color. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007.
64. Miller JR. Attribute blocks: Visualizing multiple continuously defined attributes. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 2007; 27: 57-69. (Pubitemid 46767726)
65. Malik MM, Heinzl C and Gröller ME. Comparative visualization for parameter studies of dataset series. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2010; 16(5): 829-840.
66. Wood J, Dykes J, Slingsby A and Clarke K. Interactive visual exploration of a large spatiotemporal dataset: Reflections on a geovisualization mashup. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13(6): 1176-1183. (Pubitemid 350076587)
67. Darling ACE, Mau B, Blattner FR and Perna NT. Mauve: Multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 2004; 14(7): 1394-1403. (Pubitemid 39029237)
68. Hurter C, Tissoires B and Conversy S. Fromdady: Spreading aircraft trajectories across views to support iterative queries. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15: 1017-1024.
69. Brandes U, Dwyer T and Schreiber F. Visualizing related metabolic pathways in two and a half dimensions. Graph Drawing 2003; 111-122. (Pubitemid 38170484)
70. Barnes DJ, Russell MT and Wheadon MC. Developing and adapting UNIX tools for workstations. Proceedings European Unix Users Group 1988; 321-333.
71. Monroy C, Kochumman R, Furuta R and Urbina E. Interactive timeline viewer (itlv): A tool to visualize variants among documents. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp.39-49. (Pubitemid 36079783)
72. Schreiber F. Visual comparison of metabolic pathways. J Vis Lang Comput 2003; 14(4): 327-340. (Pubitemid 37006964)
73. Sauber N, Theisel H and Seidel HP. Multifield-graphs: An approach to visualizing correlations in multifield scalar data. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12(5): 917-924. (Pubitemid 44955621)
74. Elmqvist N, Stasko J and Tsigas P. DataMeadow: A visual canvas for analysis of large-scale multivariate data. IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology October 2007; 187-194.
75. Cortese PF, Di Battista G, Moneta A, Patrignani M and Pizzonia M. Topographic visualization of prefix propagation in the internet. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12: 725-732. (Pubitemid 44955597)
76. Slingsby A, Dykes J and Wood J. Configuring hierarchical layouts to address research questions. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15(6): 977-984.
77. Deines E, Bertram M, Mohring J, Jegorovs J, Michel F, Hagen H and Nielson GM. Comparative visualization for wave-based and geometric acoustics. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12(5): 1173-1180. (Pubitemid 44955652)
78. Carver TJ, Rutherford KM, Berriman M, Rajandream MA, Barrell BG and Parkhill J. ACT: The Artemis comparison tool. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2005; 21(16): 3422-3423. (Pubitemid 41222448)
79. Tan D, Smith G, Lee B and Robertson G. AdaptiviTree: Adaptive tree visualization for tournament-style brackets. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13(6): 1113-1120. (Pubitemid 350076579)
80. Jin H and Cho H. Visualization of whole genome alignment with LOD representation. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2006; 502-509. (Pubitemid 44097426)
81. Kadaba N, Irani P and Leboe J. Visualizing causal semantics using animations. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13(6): 1254-1261. (Pubitemid 350076597)
82. Collins C, Penn G and Carpendale S. Bubble sets: Revealing set relations with isocontours over existing visualizations. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15: 1009-1016.
83. Barsky A, Munzner T, Gardy J and Kincaid R. Cerebral: Visualizing multiple experimental conditions on a graph with biological context. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2008; 14: 1253-1260.
84. Grant JR and Stothard P. The CGView server: A comparative genomics tool for circular genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36(Suppl 2): W181-W184.
85. Duran C, Boskovic Z, Imelfort M, Batley J, Hamilton NA and Edwards D. CMap3D: A 3D visualization tool for comparative genetic maps. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2010; 26(2): 273-274.
86. OgawaMand Ma KL. Code swarm: A design study in organic software visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15(6): 1097-1104.
87. Lee D, Choi JH, Dalkilic MM and Kim S. COMPAM: Visualization of combining pairwise alignments for multiple genomes. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2006; 22(2): 242-244. (Pubitemid 43205413)
88. Ribler RL and Abrams M. Using visualization to detect plagiarism in computer science classes. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Vizualization 2000, INFOVIS '00. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2000; 173-177. (Pubitemid 32072855)
89. Tu Y and Shen HW. Visualizing changes of hierarchical data using treemaps. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13(6): 1286-1293. (Pubitemid 350076601)
90. Graham M and Kennedy J. Exploring multiple trees through dag representations. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13: 1294-1301. (Pubitemid 350076602)
91. Chen J, MacEachren AM and Peuquet DJ. Constructing overview + detail dendrogram-matrix views. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15: 889-896.
92. Livny M, Ramakrishnan R, Beyer K, Chen G, Donjerkovic D, Lawande S, Myllymaki J and Wenger K. DEVise. ACM SIGMOD Record 1997; 26(2): 301-312.
93. Fiers MWEJ, van de Wetering H, Peeters THJM, van Wijk JJ and Nap JP. DNAVis: Interactive visualization of comparative genome annotations. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2006; 22(3): 354-355. (Pubitemid 43205383)
94. Strobelt H, Oelke D, Rohrdantz C, Stoffel A, Keim DA and Deussen O. Document cards: A top trumps visualization for documents. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15(6): 1145-1152.
95. Church K and Helfman J. Dotplot: A program for exploring self-similarity in millions of lines of text and code. J Comput Graph Stat 1993; 2(2): 153-174.
96. Hinrichs U, Schmidt H and Carpendale S. Emdialog: Bringing information visualization into the museum. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2008; 14: 1181-1188.
97. Chen Y, Wang L, Dong M and Hua J. Exemplar-based visualization of large document corpus (infovis2009-1115). IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15: 1161-1168.
98. Henry N and Fekete JD. Matrixexplorer: A dual-representation system to explore social networks. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12: 677-684. (Pubitemid 44955591)
99. Smith G, Czerwinski M, Meyers B, Robbins D, Robertson G and Tan DS. FacetMap: A scalable search and browse visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12(5): 797-804. (Pubitemid 44955606)
100. Guo D. Flow mapping and multivariate visualization of large spatial interaction data. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15: 1041-1048.
101. Kawahara Y, Sakate R, Matsuya A, Murakami K, Sato Y, Zhang H, Gojobori T, Itoh T and Imanishi T. G-compass: A web-based comparative genome browser between human and other vertebrate genomes. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2009; 25(24): 3321-3322.
102. Vliegen R, Wijk JV and Der EV. Visualizing business data with generalized treemaps. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 20387: 789-796. (Pubitemid 44955605)
103. Kim B, Lee B, Knoblach S, Hoffman E and Seo J. GeneShelf: A web-based visual interface for large gene expression timeseries data repositories. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15(6): 905-912.
104. Dykes J and Brunsdon C. Geographically weighted visualization: Interactive graphics for scale-varying exploratory analysis. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13: 1161-1168. (Pubitemid 350076585)
105. Heer J, Mackinlay J, Stolte C and Agrawala M. Graphical histories for visualization: Supporting analysis, communication, and evaluation. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2008; 14: 1189-1196.
106. Elmqvist N and Tsigas P. Causality visualization using animated growing polygons. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2003 2003; 189-196.
107. Kidwell P, Lebanon G and Cleveland WS. Visualizing incomplete and partially ranked data. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2008; 14(6): 1356-1363.
108. Kumar G and Garland M. Visual exploration of complex timevarying graphs. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12(5): 805-812. (Pubitemid 44955607)
109. Paulovich FV and Minghim R. HiPP: A novel hierarchical point placement strategy and its application to the exploration of document collections. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2008; 14(6): 1229-1236.
110. Fisher D. Hotmap: Looking at geographic attention. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13: 1184-1191. (Pubitemid 350076588)
111. Mehler A, Bao Y, Li X, Wang Yand Skiena S. Spatial analysis of news sources. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12(5): 765-771. (Pubitemid 44955602)
112. Freire M, Plaisant C, Shneiderman B and Golbeck J. ManyNets: An interface for multiple network analysis and visualization. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2010; 213-222.
113. Ivanov Y, Wren C, Sorokin A and Kaur I. Visualizing the history of living spaces. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13(6): 1153-1160. (Pubitemid 350076584)
114. Eick SG. Visualizing multi-dimensional data. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 2000; 34(1): 61.
115. Woodring J and Shen HW. Multi-variate, time varying, and comparative visualization with contextual cues. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12(5): 909-916. (Pubitemid 44955620)
116. Dwyer T, Hong SH, Koschützki D, Schreiber F and Xu K. Visual analysis of network centralities. Proceedings of the 2006 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information Visualisation - Volume 60, APVis '06. Australian Computer Society, Inc: Darlinghurst, Australia, 2006; 189-197.
117. Henry N, Fekete JD and McGuffin MJ. Nodetrix: A hybrid visualization of social networks. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13: 1302-1309. (Pubitemid 350076603)
118. Shneiderman B and Aris A. Network visualization by semantic substrates. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12(5): 733-740. (Pubitemid 44955598)
119. Shen Z, Ma KL and Eliassi-Rad T. Visual analysis of large heterogeneous social networks by semantic and structural abstraction. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12(6): 1427-1439. (Pubitemid 44523087)
120. Novotný M and Hauser H. Outlier-preserving focus+context visualization in parallel coordinates. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12(5): 893-900. (Pubitemid 44955618)
121. Collins C, Viegas F and Wattenberg M. Parallel tag clouds to explore and analyze faceted text corpora. IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, IEEE 2009; 91-98.
122. Meyer M, Wong B, Styczynski M, Munzner T and Pfister H. Pathline: A tool for comparative functional genomics. EuroVis10 Joint Eurographics - IEEE VGTC Symposium on Visualization 2010; 29(3).
123. Groth P, Weiss B, Pohlenz HD and Leser U. Mining phenotypes for gene function prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 2008; 9(1): 136-150.
124. Crampes M, de Oliveira-Kumar J, Ranwez S and Villerd J. Visualizing social photos on a Hasse diagram for eliciting relations and indexing new photos. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15: 985-992.
125. van Ham F, Wattenberg M and Viégas FB. Mapping text with phrase nets. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15(6): 1169-1176.
126. Stolte C and Hanrahan P. Polaris: A system for query, analysis and visualization of multi-dimensional relational databases. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000 2000; 5-14. (Pubitemid 32072836)
127. Clarkson E, Desai K and Foley J. Resultmaps: Visualization for search interfaces. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15: 1057-1064.
128. Elmqvist N, Dragicevic P and Fekete JD. Rolling the dice: Multidimensional visual exploration using scatterplot matrix navigation. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2008; 14(6): 1539-1548.
129. Willett W, Heer J and Agrawala M. Scented widgets: Improving navigation cues with embedded visualizations. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13(6): 1129-1136. (Pubitemid 350076581)
130. Esteban-Marcos A, Darling AE and Ragan MA. Seevolution: Visualizing chromosome evolution. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2009; 25(7): 960-961.
131. Liu Z, Stasko J and Sullivan T. SellTrend: Inter-attribute visual analysis of temporal transaction data. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15(6): 1025-1032.
132. Mao Y, Dillon J and Lebanon G. Sequential document visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13(6): 1208-1215. (Pubitemid 350076591)
133. Suvanaphen E and Roberts JC. Textual difference visualization of multiple search results utilizing detail in context. Proceedings of the Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics 2004. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2004; 2-8.
134. Erten C, Kobourov SG, Le V and Navabi A. Simultaneous graph drawing: Layout algorithms and visualization schemes. 11th Symposium on Graph Drawing (GD) 2003; 437-449. (Pubitemid 38170515)
135. Almagro-Garcia J, Manske M, Carret C, Campino S, Auburn S, Macinnis BL, Maslen G, Pain A, Newbold CI, Kwiatkowski DP and Clark TG. SnoopCGH: Software for visualizing comparative genomic hybridization data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2009; 25(20): 2732-2733.
136. Havre S, Hetzler E, Perrine K, Jurrus E and Miller N. Interactive visualization of multiple query results. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2001 (INFOVIS'01). IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2001; 105-112. (Pubitemid 33099033)
137. Archambault D, Munzner T and Auber D. Smashing peacocks further: Drawing quasi-trees from biconnected components. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12: 813-820. (Pubitemid 44955608)
138. Ahlberg C. Spotfire. ACM SIGMOD Record 1996; 25(4): 25-29.
139. Yuan X, Guo P, Xiao H, Zhou H and Qu H. Scattering points in parallel coordinates. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15(6): 1001-1008.
140. Chevenet F, Brun C, Banuls AL, Jacq B and Christen R. Treedyn: Towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7(1): 439-448.
141. Robertson G, Fernandez R, Fisher D, Lee B and Stasko J. Effectiveness of animation in trend visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2008; 14(6): 1325-1332.
142. Wilkinson L, Anand A and Grossman R. Graph-theoretic scagnostics. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005 2005; 157-164. (Pubitemid 44500051)
143. Chang R, Wessel G, Kosara R, Sauda E and Ribarsky W. Legible cities: Focus-dependent multiresolution visualization of urban relationships. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13: 1169-1175. (Pubitemid 350076586)
144. Keim DA and Kriegel HP. VisDB: Database exploration using multidimensional visualization. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 1994; 14(5): 40-49.
145. Dörk M, Carpendale S, Collins C and Williamson C. Visgets: Coordinated visualizations for web-based information exploration and discovery. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2008; 14: 1205-1212.
146. Collins C and Carpendale S. Vislink: Revealing relationships amongst visualizations. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13: 1192-1199. (Pubitemid 350076589)
147. Callahan SP, Freire J, Santos E, Scheidegger CE, Silva CTand Vo HT. VisTrails: Visualization meets data management. ACM SIGMOD Record 2006; 745-747. (Pubitemid 46946568)
148. Schmid C and Hinterberger H. Comparative multivariate visualization across conceptually different graphic displays. Seventh International Working Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management 1994; 42-51.
149. WinDiff Tool, Microsoft sdk tools, http:msdn.microsoft. comenuslibraryaa242739% 28vV-S.60%29.aspx. Visited October 2010.
150. Viégas FB, Wattenberg M and Feinberg J. Participatory visualization with Wordle. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2009; 15(6): 1137-1144.
151. Dorling D, Barford A and Newman M. WORLDMAPPER: The world as you've never seen it before. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12(5): 757-764. (Pubitemid 44955601)
152. Fua YH, Ward MO and Rundensteiner EA. Hierarchical parallel coordinates for exploration of large datasets. Visualization Conference, IEEE 1999; 43-50.