Endogenous jurisprudential regimes

Political Analysis

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 417-436

  Pang, Xun ^a   Friedman, Barry ^b   Martin, Andrew D ^c   Quinn, Kevin M ^d  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867623062     PISSN: 10471987     EISSN: 14764989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pan/mps024     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bai, Jushan, and Pierre Perron. 2003. Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of Applied Econometrics 18:1-22.
2. Baldez, Lisa, Lee Epstein, and Andrew D. Martin. 2006. Does the U.S. Constitution need an ERA? Journal of Legal Studies 35:243-83.
3. Barry, Daniel, and J. A. Hartigan. 1993. A Bayesian analysis for change-point problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88:309-19.
4. Brandt, Patrick T., and Todd Sandler. 2010. What do transmational terrorists target? Has it changed? Are we safe? Journal of Conflict Resolution 54:214-36.
5. Carlin, Bradley P., Alan E. Gelfand, and Adrian F. M. Smith. 1992. Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of change-point problems. Applied Statistics 41:389-405.
6. Carlin, Bradley P., and Siddhartha Chib. 1995. Bayesian model choice via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 57(3):473-84.
7. Carrubba, Clifford J., Barry Friedman, Andrew D. Martin, and Georg Vanberg. 2012. Who controls the content of Supreme Court opinions? American Journal of Political Science 56:400-12.
8. Chib, Siddhartha. 1995. Marginal Likelihood from the Gibbs Output. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90:1313-21.
9. 1996. Calculating posterior distributions and model estimates in Markov mixture models. Journal of Econometrics 75:79-98.
10. 1998. Estimation and comparison of multiple change-point models. Journal of Econometrics 86:221-41
11. Clark, Tom S., and Benjamin Lauderdale. 2010. Locating Supreme Court opinions in doctrine space. American Journal of Political Science 54:871-90.
12. Corley, Pamela C. 2008. The Supreme Court and opinion content: The influence of parties' briefs. Political Research Quarterly 61:468-78.
13. Davis, Richard A., Thomas C. M. Lee, and Gabriel A. Rodriguez-Yam. 2006. Structural break estimation for nonstationary time-series models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101:223-39
14. Friedman, Barry. 2006. Taking law seriously. Perspectives on Politics 4:261-71.
15. George, Tracey E., and Lee Epstein. 1992. On the nature of Supreme Court decision-making. American Political Science Review 86:323-37.
16. Green, Peter J. 1995. Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82:711-32.
17. Hawkins, Douglas M. 2001. Fitting multiple change-point models to data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 37:323-41.
18. Hill, Jennifer L., and Hanspeter Kriesi. 2001. Classification by opinion-changing behavior: A mixture model approach. Political Analysis 9:301-24.
19. Jacobi, Tonja, and Emerson H. Tiller. 2007. Legal doctrine and political control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23:326-45.
20. Kass, Robert E., and Adrian E. Raftery. 1995. Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90:773-95
21. Kornhauser, Lewis A. 1992a. Modeling collegial courts. I: Path dependence. International Review of Law and Economics 12:169-85.
22. 1992b. Modeling collegial courts. II: Legal doctrine. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 8:441-70
23. Kritzer, Herbert M., and Mark J. Richards. 2003. Jurisprudential regimes and Supreme Court decision-making: The Lemon regime and Establishment Clause cases. Law & Society Review 37:827-40.
24. 2005. The influence of law in the Supreme Court's search-and-seizure jurisprudence. American Politics Research 33:33-55.
25. Lavielle, Marc. 2005. Using penalized contrasts for the change-point problem. Signal Processing 85:1501-10.
26. Lax, Jeffrey R. 2011. The new judicial politics of legal doctrine. Annual Review of Political Science 14:131-57.
27. Lax, Jeffrey R., and Kelly T. Rader. 2010. Legal constraints on Supreme Court decision-making: Do jurisprudential regimes exist? Journal of Politics 72:273.
28. Maltzman, Forest, James F. Spriggs II, and Paul J. Wahlbeck 2000. Crafting law on the Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Miles, Thomas J., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2006. Do judges make regulatory policy? An empirical investigation of Chevron. University of Chicago Law Review 73:823-81.
30. Minin, Vladimir N., Karin S. Dorman, Fang Fang, and Marc A. Suchard. 2005. Dual multiple change-point model leads to more accurate recombination detection. Bioinformatics 21:3034-42.
31. Olshen, Adam B., and E. S. Venkatraman. 2004. Circular binary segementation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Bioinformatics 5:557-72.
32. Pang, Xun, Barry Friedman, Andrew D. Martin, and Kevin M. Quinn. 2012. Replication data for: endogenous jurisprudential regimes. IQSS Dataverse Network V1 [Version]. http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/18328 (accessed June 4, 2012).
33. Park, Jong Hee. 2010. Structural change in the U.S. Presidents' use of force abroad. American Journal of Political Science 54:766-82.
34. 2011. Change-point analysis of binary and ordinal probit models: An application to bank rate policy under the interwar gold standard. Political Analysis 19:188-204.
35. Pierce, Richard J., Jr. 1999. Is standing law or politics? North Carolina Law Review 77:1741-89
36. Qu, Zhongjun, and Pierre Perron. 2007. Estimating and testing structural changes in multivariate regressions. Econometrica 75:459-502.
37. Richards, Mark J., and Herbert M. Kritzer. 2002. Jurisprudential regimes in Supreme Court decision-making. American Political Science Review 96:305-20.
38. Richards, Mark J., Joseph L. Smith, and Herbert M. Kritzer. 2006. Does Chevron matter? Law & Policy 28:444-69.
39. Scott, Kevin M. 2006. Reconsidering the impact of jurisprudential regimes. Social Science Quarterly 87:380-94.
40. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1986. Supreme Court Justices as human decision-makers: An individual-level analysis of the search-andseizure cases. American Journal of Political Science 48:938-55.
41. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Albert D. Cover. 1989. Ideological values and the votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices. American Political Science Review 83:557-65.
42. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Siegmund, David. 2004. Model selection in irregular problems: Applications to mapping quantitative trait loci. Biometrika 91:785-800.
44. Spirling, Arthur. 2007. Bayesian approaches for limited dependent variable change-point problems. Political Analysis 15:387-405.
45. Staudt, Nancy C. 2004. Modeling standing. New York University Law Review 79:612-84.
46. Zhang, Nancy R., and David Siegmund. 2007. A modified Bayes information criterion with applications to the analysis of comparative genomic hybridization data. Biometrics 63:22-32.