Bayesian approaches for limited dependent variable change point problems

Political Analysis

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 387-405

  Spirling, Arthur ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35649003819     PISSN: 10471987     EISSN: 14764989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpm022     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Beck, Neal, Jonathan Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science 42:1260-88.
2. Bordo, Michael D., and Marc Flandreau. 2001. Core, periphery, exchange rate regimes and globalization. http://www.nber.org/papers/ w8584. (accessed September 1, 2005).
3. Bordo, Michael D., and Marc Flandreau. 2003. Core, periphery, exchange rate regime and globalization. In Globalization in historical perspective, M. D. Bordo, A. M. Taylor, and J. G. Williamson, 417-72. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. Bordo, Michael D., and Anna J. Schwartz. 1999 Monetary policy regimes and economic performance: The historical record. In Handbook of macroeconomics, ed. J. Taylor and M. Woodford, 149-236. London: North-Holland.
5. Caldeira, Gregory A., and Christopher J. W. Zorn. 1998. Of time and consensual norms in the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science 42:874-902.
6. Carlin, Bradley, Alan Gelfand, and Adrian Smith. 1992. Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of changepoint problems. Applied Statistics 41:389-405.
7. Casella, George, and Edward I. George. 1992. Explaining the Gibbs sampler. The American Statistician 46: 167-74.
8. Chib, Suddhartha. 1998. Estimation and comparison of multiple change-point models. Journal of Econometrics 86:221-41.
9. Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio. 1984. The political reliability of Italian governments. American Political Science Review 78:318-37.
10. Clarke, Kevin A. 2001. Testing nonnested models of international relations: Reevaluating realism. American Journal of Political Science 45:724-44.
11. Davison, A. C. 2003. Statistical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Epstein, Lee, Jeffrey A. Segal, and Harold J. Spaeth. 2001. The norm of consensus on the US Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science 45:362-77.
13. Geweke, J. 1992. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. In Bayesian statistics 4, ed. J. M. Bernardo, A. E M. Smith, A. P. Dawid, and J. O. Berger, 169-93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Gill, Jeff. 2002. Bayesian methods: A social and behavioral sciences approach. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
15. Green, Peter J. 1995. Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82:711-32.
16. Greene, William H. 2003. Econometric analysis. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
17. Huber, John. 1996. Rationalizing parliament: Legislative institutions and party politics in France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Jackman, Simon. 2000. Estimation and inference via Bayesian simulation: An introduction to Markov chain Monte Carlo. American Journal of Political Science 44:375-404.
19. Kim, Chang-Jin, and Charles R. Nelson. 1999. Has the US economy become more stable? A Bayesian approach based on a Markov-switching model of the business cycle. Review of Economics and Statistics 81:608-16.
20. King, Gary. 1988. Statistical models for political science event counts: Bias in conventional procedures and evidence for the exponential Poisson regression model. American Journal of Political Science 32: 838-63.
21. King, Gary, James E. Alt, Nancy Elizabeth Burns, and Michael Laver. 1990. A unified model of cabinet dissolution in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science 34:846-71.
22. King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44:341-55.
23. Lijphart, Arend. 1984. A note on the meaning of cabinet durability. Comparative Political Studies 17:163-66.
24. Mueller, John. 1991. Changing attitudes towards war: The impact of the first world war. British Journal of Political Science 21:1-28.
25. Nelson, Charles, and Chang-Jin Kim. 1999. State-space models with regime switching: Classical and Gibbs sampling approaches with applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Oneal, John R., and Bruce Russett. 1997. The classical liberals were right: Democracy, interdependence, and conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly 41:267-94.
27. Park, Jong Hee. 2006. Bayesian analysis of structural changes: Historical changes in US Presidential Uses of Force Abroad. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Meeting, August 2006, Philadelphia, PA.
28. Raftery, A. E., and S. M. Lewis. 1992. How many iterations in the Gibbs sampler? In Bayesian Statistics 4, ed. J. M. Bernardo, A. F. M. Smith, A. P. Dawid, and J. O. Berger, 763-73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Ruckman, P. S. 1997. Executive clemency in the United States: Origins, development, and analysis (1900-1993). Presidential Studies Quarterly 27:251-71.
30. Strom, Kaare. 1985. Party goals and government performance in parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review 79:738-54.
31. Tate, Katherine. 1991. Black political participation in the 1984 and 1988 presidential election. American Political Science Review 85:1159-76.
32. Western, Bruce. 1998. Causal heterogeneity in comparative research: A Bayesian hierarchical modelling approach. American Journal of Political Science 42:1233-59.
33. Western, Bruce, and Meredith Kleykamp. 2004. A Bayesian change point model for historical time series analysis. Political Analysis 12:354-74.
34. Wood, B. Dan. 2000. Weak theories and parameter instability: Using flexible least squares to take time varying relationships seriously. American Journal of Political Science 44:603-18.