Does the U.S. constitution need an Equal Rights Amendment?

Journal of Legal Studies

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 243-283

  Baldez, Lisa ^a   Epstein, Lee ^b,c   Martin, Andrew D ^c  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b Department of Political Science ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645319448     PISSN: 00472530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/498836     Document Type: Review

References (105)

1. Allen, David W., and Diane E. Wall. 1993. Role Orientations and Women State Supreme Court Justices. Judicature 77:156-65.
2. Atkins, Burton, and Henry Glick. 1976. Environmental and Structural Variables as Determinants of Issues in State Courts of Last Resort. American Journal of Political Science 20:735-48.
3. Azzalini, Adelchi. 2002. library sn. CRAN: The Comprehensive R Archive Network. http://tango.stat.unipd.it/SN/.
4. Beck, Phyllis W., and Joanne Alfano Baker. 1993. An Analysis of the Impact of the Pennsylvania Equal Rights Amendment. Widener Journal of Public Law 3:743-98.
5. Becker, Mary E. 1989. Obscuring the Struggle: Sex Discrimination, Social Security, and Stone, Seidman, Sunstein and Tushnet's Constitutional Law. Columbia Law Review 89:264-89.
6. Berry, William D., Evan J. Ringquist, Richard C. Fording, and Russell L. Hanson. 1998. Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93. American Journal of Political Science 42:327-48.
7. Bowsher, David K. 1998. Cracking the Code of United States v. Virginia. Duke Law Journal 48:305-39.
8. Brake, Deborah L. 1996. Sex as a Suspect Class. Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal 6:953-66.
9. Bright, Stephen B., and Patrick J. Keenan. 1995. Judges and the Politics of Death. Boston University Law Review 75:760-835.
10. Brown, Barbara A., Thomas I. Emerson, Gail Galk, and Ann E. Freedman. 1971. The Equal Rights Amendment: A Constitutional Basis for Equal Rights for Women. Yale Law Journal 80:871-985.
11. Burbank, Stephen B., and Barry Friedman, editors. 2002. Judicial Independence at the Crossroads. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage Publications.
12. Caldeira, Gregory A., John R. Wright, and Christopher J. Zorn. 1999. Sophisticated Voting and Gate-Keeping in the Supreme Court, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15:549-72.
13. Caminker, Evan H. 1994. Why Must Inferior Courts Obey Superior Court Precedent? Stanford Law Review 46:817-73.
14. Canon, Bradley C., and Dean Jaros. 1970. External Variables, Institutional Structure and Dissent on State Supreme Courts. Polity 3:175-200.
15. Case, Mary Anne. 2000. Constitutional Sex Discrimination: The Law as a Quest for Perfect Proxies. Cornell Law Review 85:1447-91.
16. _. 2002. Reflections on Constitutionalizing Women's Equality. California Law Review 90:765-90.
17. Croly, Steven P. 1995. The Majoritarian Difficulty: Elective Judiciaries and the Rule of Law. University of Chicago Law Review 62:689-791.
18. Cross, Frank B., and Emerson H. Tiller. 1998. Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals. Yale Law Journal 107:2155-75.
19. Crump, Susan. 1973. An Overview of the Equal Rights Amendment in Texas. Houston Law Review 11:136-67.
20. Dahl, Robert A. 1957. Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policymaker. Journal of Public Law 6:279-95.
21. Daughtrey, Martha Craig. 2000. Women and the Constitution. New York University Law Review 75:1-31.
22. Denning, Branon P., and John R. Vile. 2000. Necromancing the Equal Rights Amendment. Constitutional Commentary 17:593-602.
23. Deutsch, Norman T. 2003. Nguyen v. INS and the Application of Intermediate Scrutiny to Gender Classifications. Pepperdine Law Review 30:185-271.
24. Dorf, Michael C. 2002. The Paths to Legal Equality. California Law Review 90: 791-812.
25. Dorsen, Norman, and Susan Deller Ross. 1971. The Necessity of a Constitutional Amendment. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 6:216-24.
26. Eagle Forum. 2004. Equal Rights Amendment, http://www.eagleforum.org/era.
27. Emerson, Thomas I. 1971. In Support of the Equal Rights Amendment. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 6:225-33.
28. Emmert, Craig F. 1992. An Integrated Case-Related Model of Judicial Decision Making: Explaining State Supreme Court Decisions in Judicial Review Cases. Journal of Politics 54:543-52.
29. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
30. Epstein, Lee, and Lynn Mather. 2003. Beverly Blair Cook: The Values of Electicism. Pp. 172-92 in The Pioneers of Judicial Behavior, edited by Nancy Maveety. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
31. Epstein, Lee, and Thomas G. Walker. 2004. Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Rights, Liberties, and Justice. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
32. Eskridge, William N., Jr., and Nan D. Hunter. 1997. Sexuality, Gender, and the Law. Westbury, N.Y.: Foundation.
33. Estrich, Susan. 2002. Politics and the Limits of Law: A Musing for Dean Sullivan. California Law Review 90:813-17.
34. Farber, Daniel A., William N. Eskridge, Jr., and Philip P. Frickey. 2003. Constitutional Law. St Paul, Minn.: West.
35. Farone, Andrea J. 2000. The Florida Equal Rights Amendment: Raising the Standard Applied to Gender under the Equal Protection Clause of the Florida Constitution. Florida Coastal Law Journal 1:421-63.
36. Francis, Roberta W. 2001. Reconstituting the Equal Rights Amendment: Policy Implications for Sex Discrimination. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
37. Freund, Paul A. 1971. The Equal Rights Amendment Is Not the Way. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 6:234-42.
38. Gammie, Beth. 1989. State ERAs: Problems and Possibilities. University of Illinois Law Review, pp. 1123-59.
39. Genz, Alan. 1992. Numerical Computation of Multivariate Normal Probabilities. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1:141-50.
40. George, Tracey E., and Lee Epstein. 1992. On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making. American Political Science Review 86:323-37.
41. Ginsburg, Ruth Bader. 1978. The Equal Rights Amendment Is the Way. Harvard Women's Law Journal 1:19-26.
42. _. 1979. Sexual Equality under the Fourteenth and Equal Rights Amendments. Washington University Law Quarterly, pp. 161-78.
43. Click, Henry Robert, and Kenneth N. Vines. 1973. State Court Systems. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
44. Goldstein, Leslie Friedman. 1994. Contemporary Cases in Women's Rights. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
45. Greenberg, Jack. 1976. Judicial Process and Social Change. St. Paul, Minn.: West.
46. Gryski, Gerard S., Eleanor C. Main, and William J. Dixon. 1986. Models of State High Court Decision Making in Sex Discrimination Cases. Journal of Politics 48:143-55.
47. Gunther, Gerald. 1971. Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection. Harvard Law Review 86:1-49.
48. Halberstam, Malvina, and Elizabeth F. Defeis. 1994. Women, Law, and Inequality: Rethinking International Human Rights. Cardozo Law Review 16: 153-68.
49. Hall, Melinda Gann. 1987. Constituent Influence in State Supreme Court: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study. Journal of Politics 49:1117-24.
50. Harvard Law Review. 1970. Sex Discrimination and Equal Protection: Do We Need a Constitutional Amendment? special issue. 84:1499-1524.
51. Hirczy de Mino, Wolfgang P. 1997. Does an Equal Rights Amendment Make a Difference? Albany Law Review 60:1581-1612.
52. Hunter, Nan D. 2001. The Sex Discrimination Argument in Gay Rights Cases. Journal of Law and Policy 9:397-416.
53. Ihaka, Ross, and Robert Gentleman. 1999. R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics. Journal of Graphical and Computational Statistics 5:299-314.
54. Kaufman, Risa E. 2001. State ERAs in the New Era: Securing Poor Women's Equality by Eliminating Reproductive-Based Discrimination. Harvard Women's Rights Law Journal 24:191-219.
55. Kay, Herma Hill. 1981. Sex-Based Discrimination. St. Paul, Minn.: West.
56. _. 1988. Text, Cases and Materials on Sex-Based Discrimination. St. Paul, Minn.: West.
57. _. 2004. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Professor of Law. Columbia Law Review 104:1-20.
58. Kay, Herma Hill, and Geraldine Sparrow. 2001. Introduction: Workshop on Judging: Does Gender Make a Difference? Wisconsin Women's Law Journal 16:1-13.
59. King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44:341-55.
60. Knight, Jack, and Lee Epstein. 1996. The Norm of Stare Decisis. American Journal of Political Science 40:1018-35.
61. Kurland, Philip B. 1971. The Equal Rights Amendments: Some Problems of Construction. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 6:243-52.
62. Langer, Laura. 2004. Multiple Actors and Competing Risks in the Policymaking (Unmaking Game) of Judicial Review. University of Arizona, Department of Political Science.
63. Linton, Paul Benjamin. 1997. State Equal Rights Amendments: Making a Difference or a Statement. Temple Law Review 70:907-41.
64. Lukey, Joan A., and Jeffrey A. Smagula. 2000. Do We Still Need a Federal Equal Rights Amendment? Boston Bar Journal 44:10-28.
65. MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1987. Unthinking ERA Thinking. University of Chicago Law Review 54:759-71.
66. Mansbridge, Jane J. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67. McCausland, Mary Patrice. 1983. Washington's Equal Rights Amendment and Law against Discrimination. Washington Law Review 58:465-79.
68. McKelvey, William, and William Zavoina. 1975. A Statistical Model for the Analysis of A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal Level Dependent Variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 4:103-20.
69. Mezey, Susan Gluck. 1992. In Pursuit of Equality. New York: St. Martin's.
70. _. 2003. Elusive Equality. Boulder, Col.: Lynne Rienner.
71. Minnesota Law Review. 1973. The Effect of the Equal Rights Amendment on Minnesota Law, special issue. 57:771-805.
72. Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73. National Council of Women's Organizations. 2004. ERA Task Force, http://ncwo-online.org/pages.cfm?ID=162.
74. Nocedal, Jorge, and Stephen J. Wright. 1999. Numerical Optimization. New York: Springer.
75. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. In Defense of Universal Values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. O'Neill, Kevin Francis. 1993. The Road Not Taken: State Constitutions as an Alternative Source of Protection for Reproductive Rights. New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 11:5-77.
77. Pinello, Daniel R. 1995. The Impact of Judicial Selection Method on State-Supreme-Court Policy. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
78. _. 2003. Gay Rights and American Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79. Post, Robert C. 2003. The Supreme Court, 2002 Term: Foreword: Fashioning the Legal Constitution: Culture, Courts, and Law. Harvard Law Review 117:4-112.
80. Revesz, Richard L. 1997. Environmental Regulation, Ideology, and the D.C. Circuit. Virginia Law Review 83:1717-72.
81. Richards, Mark J., and Herbert M. Kritzer. 2002. Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making. American Political Science Review 96: 305-20.
82. Schneider, Daniel M. 2001. Empirical Research on Judicial Reasoning: Statutory Interpretation in Federal Tax Cases. New Mexico Law Review 31:325-51.
83. Schoen, Rodric B. 1978. The Texas Equal Rights Amendment in the Courts - 1972-1977: A Review of Proposed Principles of Interpretation. Houston Law Review 15:537-630.
84. Segal, Jeffrey A., Charles M. Cameron, and Donald R. Songer. 1995. Decision Making on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Pp. 227-50 in Contemplating Courts, edited by Lee Epstein. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
85. Sherry, Suzanna. 1986. Civic Virtue and the Feminine Voice in Constitutional Adjudication. Virginia Law Review 72:543-616.
86. Sherwin, Elizabeth A. 1984-85. Sex Discrimination and State Constitutions: State Pathways through Federal Roadblocks. New York University Review of Law and Social Change 13:115-47.
87. Siegel, Reva B. 2001. Text in Contest. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 150:297-351.
88. Simpson, Reagan W. 1977. A New Look at the Texas Equal Rights Amendment. Texas Law Review 55:323-42.
89. Soule, Sarah A., and Susan Olzak. 2004. When Do Social Movements Matter? The Politics of Contingency and the Equal Rights Amendment. American Sociological Review 69:473-97.
90. Spaeth, Harold J. 1999. Expanded United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, 1946-68. Study No. 6557. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
91. _. 2005. The Original United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, 1953-2003 Terms. Lexington, Ky.: Ulmer Project for Research in Law and Judicial Politics.
92. Stanford Law Review. 1950. Sex, Discrimination, and the Constitution, special issue. 2:691-730.
93. Stobaugh, Heather L. 2002. The Aftermath of United States v. Virginia. SMU Law Review 55:1755-79.
94. Strauss, David A. 2001. The Irrelevance of Constitutional Amendments. Harvard Law Review 114:1457-1505.
95. Sullivan, Kathleen M. 2002. Constitutionalizing Women's Equality. California Law Review 90:735-64.
96. Sunstein, Cass R. 1996. Foreword: Leaving Things Undecided. Harvard Law Review 110:4-101.
97. Tabarrok, Alexander, and Eric Heiland. 1999. Court Politics: The Political Economy of Tort Awards. Journal of Law and Economics 42:157-87.
98. Tarr, G. Alan, and M. C. Porter. 1982. Gender Equality and Judicial Federalism. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 9:919-72.
99. Traut, Carol Ann, and Craig F. Emmert. 1998. Expanding the Integrated Model of Judicial Decision Making: The California Justices and Capital Punishment. Journal of Politics 60:1166-80.
100. Vollers, Tony. 1974. The Equal Rights Amendment: Its Meaning and Its Impact on Missouri Law. Missouri Law Review 39:553-72.
101. Weinrib, Laura. 2003. Protecting Sex: Sexual Disincentives and Sex Based Discrimination in Nguyen v. INS. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 12: 222-73.
102. Wheeler, Stanton, Bliss Cartwright, Robert Kagan, and Lawrence M. Friedman. 1987. Do the "Haves" Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870-1970. Law and Society Review 21:403-45.
103. White, Halbert. 1980. A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48:817-38.
104. Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
105. Yale Law Journal. 1978. Courting Reversal: The Supervisory Role of State Supreme Courts, special issue. 87:1191-1218.