Pericarp tissue microstructure and cell wall polysaccharide chemistry are differently affected in lines of tomato with contrasted firmness

Postharvest Biology and Technology

Volumn 76, Issue , 2013, Pages 83-90

  Lahaye, Marc ^a   Devaux, Marie Françoise ^a   Poole, Mervin ^b,d   Seymour, Graham B ^b   Causse, Mathilde ^c  

^a INRA   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c Researches Center of Avignon   (France)

^d CAMPDEN BRI   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cell wall; Compression test; Histology; Solanum lycopersicum; Texture QTL; Tomato

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 84867598689     PISSN: 09255214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abbott J.A. Textural quality assessment for fresh fruits and vegetables. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 2004, 542:265-279.
2. Abbott J.A., Lu R. Anisotropic mechanical properties of apples. Transactions of the ASAE 1996, 39:1451-1459.
3. Alamar M.C., Vanstreels E., Oey M.L., Molto E., Nicolai B.M. Micromechanical behaviour of apple tissue in tensile and compression tests: storage conditions and cultivar effect. Journal of Food Engineering 2008, 86:324-333.
4. Allan-Wojtas P., Sanford K.A., McRae K.B., Carbyn S. An integrated microstructural and sensory approach to describe apple texture. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 2003, 128:381-390.
5. Bernacchi D., Beck-Bunn T., Eshed Y., Lopez J., Petiard V., Uhlig J., Zamir D., Tanksley S. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in tomato. I. Identification of QTLs for traits of agronomic importance from Lycopersicon hirsutum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1998, 97:381-397.
6. Bertin N., Borel C., Brunel B., Cheniclet C., Causse M. Do genetic make-up and growth manipulation affect tomato fruit size by cell number, or cell size and DNA endoreplication?. Annals of Botany 2003, 92:415-424.
7. Bertin N., Causse M., Brunel B., Tricon D., Genard M. Identification of growth processes involved in QTLs for tomato fruit size and composition. Journal of Experimental Botany 2009, 60:237-248.
8. Brummell D.A. Cell wall disassembly in ripening fruit. Functional Plant Biology 2006, 33:103-119.
9. Brummell D.A., Harpster M.H., Civello P.M., Palys J.M., Bennett A.B., Dunsmuir P. Modification of expansin protein abundance in tomato fruit alters softening and cell wall polymer metabolism during ripening. Plant Cell 1999, 11:2203-2216.
10. Causse M., Friguet C., Coiret C., Lépicier M., Navez B., Lee M., Holthuysen N., Sinesio F., Moneta E., Grandillo S. Consumer preferences for fresh tomato at the European scale: a common segmentation on taste and firmness. Journal of Food Science 2010, 75:S531-S541.
11. Causse M., Saliba-Colombani V., Lecomte L., Duffé P., Rousselle P., Buret M. QTL analysis of fruit quality in fresh market tomato: a few chromosome regions controls the variation of sensory and instrumental traits. Journal of Experimental Botany 2002, 53:2089-2098.
12. Chaib J., Devaux M.-F., Grotte M.-C., Robini K., Causse M., Lahaye M., Marty I. Physiological relationships among physical, sensory, and morphological attributes of texture in tomato fruits. Journal of Experimental Botany 2007, 58:1915-1925.
13. Chaib J., Lecomte L., Buret M., Causse M. Stability over genetic backgrounds, generations and years of quantitative trait locus (QTLs) for organoleptic quality in tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2006, 112:934-944.
14. Cheniclet C., Rong W.Y., Causse M., Frangne N., Bolling L., Carde J.-P., Renaudin J.-P. Cell expansion and endoreduplication show a large genetic variability in pericarp and contribute strongly to tomato fruit growth. Plant Physiology 2005, 139:1984-1994.
15. De Belie N., Hallett I., Harker F.R., De Baerdemaeker J. Influence of ripening and turgor on the tensile properties of pears: a microscopic study of cellular and tissue changes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 2000, 125:350-356.
16. Devaux M.-F., Bouchet B., Legland D., Guillon F., Lahaye M. Macro-vision and grey level granulometry for quantification of tomato pericarp structure. Postharvest Biology and Technology 2008, 47:199-209.
17. Doganlar S., Frary A., Ku H.M., Tanksley S.D. Mapping quantitative trait loci in inbred backcross lines of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (LA1589). Genome 2002, 45:1189-1202.
18. Dumville J.C., Fry S.C. Solubilisation of tomato fruit pectins by ascorbate: a possible non-enzymatic mechanism of fruit softening. Planta 2003, 217:951-961.
19. Eklof J.M., Brumer H. The XTH gene family: an update on enzyme structure, function, and phylogeny in xyloglucan remodeling. Plant Physiology 2010, 153:456-466.
20. Eshed Y., Zamir D. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTLs. Genetics 1995, 141:1147-1162.
21. Faurobert M., Mihr C., Bertin N., Pawlowski T., Negroni L., Sommerer N., Causse M. Major proteome variations associated with cherry tomato pericarp development and ripening. Plant Physiology 2007, 143:1327-1346.
22. Frary A., Fulton T.M., Zamir D., Tanksley S.D. Advanced backcross QTL analysis of a Lycopersicon esculentum×L. pennellii cross and identification of possible orthologs in the Solanaceae. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2004, 108:485-496.
23. Fry S.C., York W.S., Albersheim P., Darvill A., Hayashi T., Joseleau J.P., Kato Y., Perez Lorences E., MacLachlan G.A., McNeil M., Mort A.J., Reid J.S.G., Seitz H.U., Selvendran R.R., Voragen A.G.J., White A.R. An unambiguous nomenclature for xyloglucan-derived oligosaccharides. Physiologia Plantarum 1993, 89:1-3.
24. Fulton T.M., BeckBunn T., Emmatty D., Eshed Y., Lopez J., Petiard V., Uhlig J., Zamir D., Tanksley S.D. QTL analysis of an advanced backcross of Lycopersicon peruvianum to the cultivated tomato and comparisons with QTLs found in other wild species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1997, 95:881-894.
25. Fulton T.M., Grandillo S., Beck-Bunn T., Fridman E., Frampton A., Lopez J., Petiard V., Uhlig J., Zamir D., Tanksley S.D. Advanced backcross QTL analysis of a Lycopersicon esculentum×Lycopersicon parviflorum cross. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2000, 100:1025-1042.
26. Galvez-Lopez D., Laurens F., Quemener B., Lahaye M. Variability of cell wall polysaccharides composition and hemicellulose enzymatic profile in an apple progeny. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2011, 49:1104-1109.
27. Giovannoni J.J. Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 2004, 16:S170-S180.
28. Goulao L.F., Oliveira C.M. Cell wall modifications during fruit ripening: when a fruit is not the fruit. Trends in Food Science and Technology 2008, 19:4-25.
29. Grotte M., Duprat F., Loonis D., Pietri E. Mechanical properties of the skin and the flesh of apples. International Journal of Food Properties 2001, 4:149-161.
30. Guillon F., Philippe S., Bouchet B., Devaux M.F., Frasse P., Jones B., Bouzayen M., Lahaye M. Down-regulation of an auxin response factor in the tomato induces modification of fine pectin structure and tissue architecture. Journal of Experimental Botany 2008, 59:273-288.
31. Jackman R.L., Stanley D.W. Perspectives in the textural evaluation of plant foods. Trends in Food Science and Technology 1995, 6:187-194.
32. Kalamaki M.S., Harpster M.H., Palys J.M., Labavitch J.M., Reid D.S., Brummell D.A. Simultaneous transgenic suppression of LePG and LeExp1 influences rheological properties of juice and concentrates from a processing tomato variety. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2003, 51:7456-7464.
33. Khan A.A., Vincent J.F.V. Anisotropy in the fracture properties of apple flesh as investigated by crack-opening tests. Journal of Materials Science 1993, 28:45-51.
34. Lahaye M., Quemener B., Causse M., Seymour G.B. Hemicellulose fine structure is affected differently during ripening of tomato lines with contrasted firmness. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2012, 51:462-470.
35. Lana M.M., Tijskens L.M.M., de Theije A., Dekker M., Barrett D.M. Measurement of firmness of fresh-cut sliced tomato using puncture tests-studies on sample size, probe size and direction of puncture. Journal of Texture Studies 2007, 38:601-618.
36. Mann H., Bedford D., Luby J., Vickers Z., Tong C. Relationship of instrumental and sensory texture measurements of fresh and stored apples to cell number and size. HortScience 2005, 40:1815-1820.
37. Marcus S.E., Blake A.W., Benians T.A.S., Lee K.J.D., Poyser C., Donaldson L., Leroux O., Rogowski A., Petersen H.L., Boraston A., Gilbert H.J., Willats W.G.T., Paul Knox J. Restricted access of proteins to mannan polysaccharides in intact plant cell walls. Plant Journal 2010, 64:191-203.
38. Matas A.J., Gapper N.E., Chung M.Y., Giovannoni J.J., Rose J.K. Biology and genetic engineering of fruit maturation for enhanced quality and shelf-life. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2009, 20:197-203.
39. McCartney L., Ormerod A.P., Gidley M.J., Knox J.P. Temporal and spatial regulation of pectic (1→4)-β-d-galactan in cell walls of developing pea cotyledons: implications for mechanical properties. Plant Journal 2000, 22:105-113.
40. Miedes E., Herbers K., Sonnewald U., Lorences E.P. Overexpression of a cell wall enzyme reduces xyloglucan depolymerization and softening of transgenic tomato fruits. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2010, 58:5708-5713.
41. Ordaz-Ortiz J.J., Marcus S.E., Knox J.P. Cell wall microstructure analysis implicates hemicellulose polysaccharides in cell adhesion in tomato fruit pericarp parenchyma. Molecular Plant 2009, 2:910-921.
42. Page D., Marty I., Bouchet J.P., Gouble B., Causse M. Isolation of genes potentially related to fruit quality by substractive selective hybridization in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany 2008, 50:117-124.
43. Pena M.J., Ryden P., Madson M., Smith A.C., Carpita N.C. The galactose residues of xyloglucan are essential to maintain mechanical strength of the primary cell walls in Arabidopsis during growth. Plant Physiology 2004, 134:443-451.
44. Powell A.L.T., Kalamaki M.S., Kurien P.A., Gurrieri S., Bennett A.B. Simultaneous transgenic suppression of LePG and LeEXP1 influences fruit texture and juice viscosity in a fresh market tomato variety. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2003, 51:7450-7455.
45. Prudent M., Causse M., Genard M., Tripodi P., Grandillo S., Bertin N. Genetic and physiological analysis of tomato fruit weight and composition: influence of carbon availability on QTL detection. Journal of Experimental Botany 2009, 60:923-937.
46. Quemener B., Bertrand D., Marty M., Causse M., Lahaye M. Fast data preprocessing for chromatographic fingerprints of tomato cell wall polysaccharides using chemometric methods. Journal of Chromatography A 2007, 1141:41-49.
47. Saladie M., Matas A.J., Isaacson T., Jenks M.A., Goodwin S.M., Niklas K.J., Xiaolin R., Labavitch J.M., Shackel K.A., Fernie A.R., Lytovchenko A., O'Neill M., Watkins C.B., Rose J.K.C. A reevaluation of the key factors that influence tomato fruit softening and integrity. Plant Physiology 2007, 144:1012-1028.
48. Seymour G., Poole M., King G.J. Genetics and epigenetics of fruit development and ripening. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2008, 11:58-63.
49. Shackel K.A., Greve C., Labavitch J.M., Ahmadi H. Cell turgor changes associated with ripening in tomato pericarp tissue. Plant Physiology 1991, 97:814-816.
50. Stevens R., Page D., Gouble B., Garchery C., Zamir D., Causse M. Tomato fruit ascorbic acid content is linked with monohydroascorbate reductase activity and tolerance to chilling stress. Plant, Cell & Environment 2008, 31:1086-1096.
51. Tanksley S.D., Nelson J.C. Advanced backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1996, 92:191-203.
52. Thomas T., Shackel K., Matthews M. Mesocarp cell turgor in Vitis vinifera L. berries throughout development and its relation to firmness, growth, and the onset of ripening. Planta 2008, 228:1067-1076.
53. Vicente A.R., Saladie M., Rose J.K.C., Labavitch J.M. The linkage between cell wall metabolism and fruit softening: looking to the future. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2007, 87:1435-1448.
54. Vincent J.F.V. Relationship between density and stiffness of apple flesh. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1989, 47:443-462.
55. Waldron K.W., Park M.L., Smith A.C. Plant cell walls and food quality. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2003, 2:101-119.
56. Zanor M.I., Rambla J.-L., Chaib J., Steppa A., Medina A., Granell A., Fernie A.R., Causse M. Metabolic characterization of loci affecting sensory attributes in tomato allows an assessment of the influence of the levels of primary metabolites and volatile organic contents. Journal of Experimental Botany 2009, 60:2139-2154.
57. Zdunek A., Umeda M. Influence of cell size and cell wall volume fraction on failure properties of potato and carrot tissue. Journal of Texture Studies 2005, 36:25-43.