Cell expansion and endoreduplication show a large genetic variability in pericarp and contribute strongly to tomato fruit growth

Plant Physiology

Volumn 139, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1984-1994

  Cheniclet, Catherine ^a   Rong, Wen Ying ^a   Causse, Mathilde ^b   Frangne, Nathalie ^a   Bolling, Laurence ^a   Carde, Jean Pierre ^a   Renaudin, Jean Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^b Researches Center of Avignon   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; PLANT CELL CULTURE;

CELL EXPANSION; ENDOREDUPLICATION; PERICARP PATTERNING;

FRUITS;

CELL STRUCTURE; DATA; TOMATOES;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM VAR. CERASIFORME; SOLANUM;

ARTICLE; CELL ENLARGEMENT; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOLOGY; FRUIT; GENE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; POLYPLOIDY; TOMATO;

CELL ENLARGEMENT; CELL PROLIFERATION; FRUIT; GENE DUPLICATION; GENES, PLANT; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; POLYPLOIDY;

EID: 33645001375     PISSN: 00320889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1104/pp.105.068767     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barow M, Meister A (2003) Endopolyploidy in seed plants is differently correlated to systematic, organ, life strategy and genome size. Plant Cell Environ 26: 571-584
2. Beemster GTS, de Vusser K, de Tavernier E, de Bock K, Inzé D (2002) Variation in growth rate between Arabidopsis ecotypes is correlated with cell division and A-type cyclin-dependent kinase activity. Plant Physiol 129: 854-864
3. Bergervoet J, Verhoeven H, Glilissen L, Bino R (1996) High amounts of nuclear DNA in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) pericarp. Plant Sci 116: 141-145
4. Bertin N, Borel C, Brunel B, Cheniclet C, Causse M (2003) Do genetic make-up and growth manipulation affect tomato fruit size by cell number, or cell size and DNA endoreduplication? Ann Bot (Lond) 92: 415-424
5. Bohner J, Bangerth F (1988) Cell number, cell size and hormone levels in semi-isogenic mutants of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium differing in fruit size. Physiol Plant 72: 316-320
6. Buvat R (1965) Les bases cytologiques de la différenciation et de la dédifférenciation chez les plantes. In W Ruhland, ed, Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, Vol 15. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 100-145
7. Causse M, Saliba-Calombani V, Lecomte L, Duffe P, Rousselle P, Buret M (2002) QTL analysis of fruit quality in fresh market tomato: a few chromosome regions control the variation of sensory and instrumental traits. J Exp Bot 53: 2089-2098
8. Cong B, Liu J, Tanksley SD (2002) Natural alleles at a tomato fruit size quantitative trait locus differ by heterochronic regulatory mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 13606-13611
9. Considine J, Knox R. (1981) Tissue origins, cell lineages and patterns of cell division in the developing dermal system of the fruit of Vitis vinifera. Planta 151: 403-412
10. Coombe BG (1976) The development of fleshy fruits. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 27: 207-228
11. Day S, Lawrence P (2000) Measuring dimensions: the regulation of size and shape. Development 127: 2977-2987
12. Dilkes BP, Dante RA, Coelho C, Larkins BA (2002) Genetic analyses of endoreduplication in Zea mays endosperm: evidence of sporophytic and zygotic maternal control. Genetics 160: 1163-1177
13. Dolan L, Davies J (2004) Cell expansion in roots. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7: 33-39
14. Edgar BA, Orr-Weaver TL (2001) Endoreplication cell cycles: more for less. Cell 105: 297-306
15. Esau K (1962) Plant Anatomy. Wiley, New York
16. Frary A, Nesbitt TC, Grandillo S, Knaap E, Cong B, Liu J, Meller J, Elber R, Alpert KB, Tanksley SD (2000) fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289: 85-88
17. Gendreau E, Hofte H, Grandjean O, Brown S, Traas J (1998) Phytochrome controls the number of endoreduplication cycles in the Arobidopsis thaliana hypocotyls. Plant J 13: 221-230
18. Gillaspy G, Ben-David H, Gruissem W (1993) Fruits: a developmental perspective. Plant Cell 5: 1439-1451
19. Giovannoni JJ (2004) Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 16: 170-180
20. Gray JD, Kolesik P, Hoj PB, Coombe BG (1999) Confocal measurement of the three-dimensional size and shape of plant parenchyma cells in a developing fruit tissue. Plant J 19: 229-236
21. Harada T, Kurahashi W, Yanai M, Wakasa Y, Satoh T (2005) Involvement of cell proliferation and cell enlargement in increasing the fruit size of Malus species. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 105: 447-456
22. Higashi K, Hosoya K, Ezura H (1999) Histological analysis of fruit development between two melon (Cucumis melo L reticulatus) genotypes setting a different size of fruit. J Exp Bot 50: 1593-1597
23. Hulskamp M (2004) Plant trichomes: a model for cell differentiation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 471-480
24. Joubès J, Phan TH, Just D, Rothan C, Bergounious C, Raymond P, Chevalier C (1999) Molecular and biochemical characterization of the involvement of cyclin-dependent kinase A during the early development of tomato fruit. Plant Physiol 121: 857-869
25. Kondorosi E, Roudier F, Gendreau E (2000) Plant cell-size control: growing by ploidy? Curr Opin Plant Biol 3: 488-492
26. Larkins BA, Dilkes BP, Dante RA, Coelho CM, Woo YM, Liu Y (2001) Investigating the hows and whys of DNA endoreduplication. J Exp Bot 52: 183-192
27. Leiva-Neto JT, Grafi G, Sabelli PA, Dante RA, Woo YM, Maddock S, Gordon-Kamm WJ, Larkins BA (2004) A dominant negative mutant of cyclin-dependent kinase A reduces endoreduplication but not cell size or gene expression in maize endosperm. Plant Cell 16: 1854-1869
28. Lemontey C, Mousset-Declas C, Munier-Jolain N, Boutin JP (2000) Maternal genotype influences pea seed size by controlling both mitotic activity during early embryogenesis and final endoreduplication level/cotyledon cell size in mature seed. J Exp Bot 51: 167-175
29. List A (1963) Some observations on DNA content and cell and nuclear volume growth in the developing xylem cells of certain higher plants. Am J Bot 50: 320-329
30. Liu J, Cong B, Tanksley SD (2003) Generation and analysis of an artificial gene dosage series in tomato to study the mechanisms by which the doned quantitative trait locus fw2.2 controls fruit size. Plant Physiol 132: 292-299
31. Mazzucato A, Taddei AR, Soressi GP (1998) The parthenocarpic fruit (pat) mutant of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) sets seedless fruits and has aberrant anther and ovule development. Development 125: 107-114
32. Melaragno JE, Mehrotra B, Coleman AW (1993) Relationship between endopolyploidy and cell size in epidermal tissue of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 5: 1661-1668
33. Ojeda H, Deloire A, Carbonneau A, Ageorges A, Romieu C (1999) Berry development of grapevines: relations between the growth of berries and their DNA content indicate cell multiplication and enlargement. Vitis 38: 145-150
34. Picken A (1984) A review of pollination and fruit set in the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). J Hortic Sci 59: 1-13
35. Shackel KA, Labavitch JM, Ahmadi H (1991) CeU turgor changes associated with ripening in tomato pericarp tissue. Plant Physiol 97: 814-816
36. Smith O (1935) Pollination and life-history studies of the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, paper number 133
37. Storchova Z, Pellman D (2004) From polyploidy to aneuploidy, genome instability and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 45-54
38. Sugimoto-Shirasu K, Roberts K (2003) "Big it up": endoreduplication and cell-size control in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6: 544-553
39. Tanksley SD (2004) The genetic, developmental, and molecular bases of fruit size and shape variation in tomato. Plant Cell 16: 181-189
40. Vilhar B, Kladnik A, Blejec A, Chourey PS, Dermastia M (2002) Cytometrical evidence that the loss of seed weight in the miniaturel seed mutant of maize is associated with reduced mitotic activity in the developing endosperm. Plant Physiol 129: 23-30