Disentangling common and specific neural subprocesses of response inhibition

NeuroImage

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 601-615

  Sebastian, A ^a,d   Pohl, M F ^a   Kloppel S ^a   Feige, B ^a   Lange, T ^a   Stahl, C ^b   Voss, A ^c   Klauer, K C ^a   Lieb, K ^d   Tuscher O ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^d JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Go no go task; Impulse control; Inferior frontal gyrus; Pre supplementary motor area; Simon task; Stop signal task

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ARTICLE; BASAL GANGLION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELLIPSOMETRY; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM GYRUS; GO NO GO TASK; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMPULSE CONTROL DISORDER; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; MALE; MASKING; MIDDLE FRONTAL GYRUS; NEUROTRANSMISSION; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTERIOR CINGULATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUTAMEN; RESPONSE INHIBITION; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STOP SIGNAL TASK; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NERVE NET; NEURAL INHIBITION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867598370     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.020     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aron A.R. From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biol. Psychiatry 2011, 69:e55-e68.
2. Aron A.R., Poldrack R.A. Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:2424-2433.
3. Band G.P., van Boxtel G.J. Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychol. 1999, 101:179-211.
4. Barkley R.A. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychol. Bull. 1997, 65-94.
5. Boehler C., Appelbaum L., Krebs R., Hopf J., Woldorff M. Pinning down response inhibition in the brain - conjunction analyses of the Stop-signal task. Neuroimage 2010, 52:1621-1632.
6. Boehler C.N., Appelbaum L.G., Krebs R.M., Chen L.-C., Woldorff M.G., Wenderoth N. The role of stimulus salience and attentional capture across the neural hierarchy in a Stop-signal task. PLoS One 2011, 6:e26386.
7. Carp J., Kim K., Taylor S.F., Fitzgerald K.D., Weissman D.H. Conditional differences in mean reaction time explain effects of response congruency, but not accuracy, on posterior medial frontal cortex activity. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2010, 4:231.
8. Chao H.H.A., Luo X., Chang J.L.K., Li C.-S.R. Activation of the pre-supplementary motor area but not inferior prefrontal cortex in association with short stop signal reaction time - an intra-subject analysis. BMC Neurosci. 2009, 10:75.
9. Chambers C.D., Bellgrove M.A., Stokes M.G., Henderson T.R., Garavan H., Robertson I.H., Morris A.P., Mattingley J.B. Executive ''Brake Failure'' following deactivation of human frontal lobe. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:444-455.
10. Chambers C.D., Bellgrove M.A., Gould I.C., English T., Garavan H., McNaught E., Kamke M., Mattingley J.B. Dissociable Mechanisms of Cognitive Control in Prefrontal and Premotor Cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 98:3638-3647.
11. Chevrier A.D., Noseworthy M.D., Schachar R. Dissociation of response inhibition and performance monitoring in the stop signal task using event-related fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2007, 28:1347-1358.
12. Chikazoe J. Localizing performance of go/no-go tasks to prefrontal cortical subregions. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2010, 23:267-272.
13. Chikazoe J., Jimura K., Asari T., Yamashita K.-I., Morimoto H., Hirose S., Miyashita Y., Konishi S. Functional Dissociation in right inferior frontal cortex during performance of Go/no-go task. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:146-152.
14. Chouinard P.A. The primary motor and premotor areas of the human cerebral cortex. Neuroscientist 2006, 12:143-152.
15. Cisek P., Kalaska J.F. Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron 2005, 45:801-814.
16. Dalley J.W., Everitt B.J., Robbins T.W. Impulsivity, compulsivity, and top-down cognitive control. Neuron 2011, 69:680-694.
17. Dodds C.M., Morein-Zamir S., Robbins T.W. Dissociating inhibition, attention, and response control in the frontoparietal network using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 21:1155-1165.
18. Duann J.-R., Ide J.S., Luo X., Li C.-S.R. Functional connectivity delineates distinct roles of the inferior frontal cortex and presupplementary motor area in stop signal inhibition. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:10171-10179.
19. Eagle D.M., Bari A., Robbins T.W. The neuropsychopharmacology of action inhibition: cross-species translation of the stop-signal and go/no-go tasks. Psychopharmacology 2008, 199:439-456.
20. Egner T., Delano M., Hirsch J. Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. Neuroimage 2007, 35:940-948.
21. Evenden J.L. Varieties of impulsivity. Psychopharmacology 1999, 146:348-361.
22. Floden D., Stuss D.T. Inhibitory control is slowed in patients with right superior medial frontal damage. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:1843-1849.
23. Forstmann B.U., Jahfari S., Scholte H.S., Wolfensteller U., van den Wildenberg W.P.M., Ridderinkhof K.R. Function and structure of the right inferior frontal cortex predict individual differences in response inhibition: a model-based approach. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:9790-9796.
24. Friston K.J., Penny W.D., Glaser D.E. Conjunction revisited. Neuroimage 2005, 25:661-667.
25. Frühholz S., Godde B., Finke M., Herrmann M. Spatio-temporal brain dynamics in a combined stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflict task. Neuroimage 2011, 54:622-634.
26. Garavan H., Ross T.J., Stein E.A. Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1999, 96:8301-8306.
27. Grinband J., Savitskaya J., Wager T.D., Teichert T., Ferrera V.P., Hirsch J. The dorsal medial frontal cortex is sensitive to time on task, not response conflict or error likelihood. Neuroimage 2011, 57:303-311.
28. Hampshire A., Chamberlain S.R., Monti M.M., Duncan J., Owen A.M. The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control. Neuroimage 2010, 50:1313-1319.
29. Jacobson L., Ezra A., Berger U., Lavidor M. Modulating oscillatory brain activity correlates of behavioral inhibition using transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012, 123:979-984.
30. Jahfari S., Waldorp L., van den Wildenberg W.P.M., Scholte H.S., Ridderinkhof K.R., Forstmann B.U. Effective connectivity reveals important roles for both the hyperdirect (fronto-subthalamic) and the indirect (fronto-striatal-pallidal) fronto-basal ganglia pathways during response inhibition. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:6891-6899.
31. Kerns J.G. Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an FMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task. Neuroimage 2006, 33:399-405.
32. Klöppel S., Vongerichten A., van Eimeren T., Frackowiak R.S.J., Siebner H.R. Can left-handedness be switched? Insights from an early switch of handwriting. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:7847-7853.
33. Laird A.R., Fox P.M., Price C.J., Glahn D.C., Uecker A.M., Lancaster J.L., Turkeltaub P.E., Kochunov P., Fox P.T. ALE meta-analysis: controlling the false discovery rate and performing statistical contrasts. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2005, 25:155-164.
34. Levy B.J., Wagner A.D. Cognitive control and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: reflexive reorienting, motor inhibition, and action updating. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1224:40-62.
35. Li C.S., Huang C., Constable R.T., Sinha R. Imaging response inhibition in a stop-signal task: neural correlates independent of signal monitoring and post-response processing. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:186-192.
36. Liu X., Banich M., Jacobson B., Tanabe J. Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 2004, 22:1097-1106.
37. Logan G.D., Cowan W.B., Davis K.A. On the ability to inhibit responses in simple and choice reaction time tasks: a model and a method. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1984, 276-291.
38. Mars R.B., Klein M.C., Neubert F.-X., Olivier E., Buch E.R., Boorman E.D., Rushworth M.F.S. Short-latency influence of medial frontal cortex on primary motor cortex during action selection under conflict. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:6926-6931.
39. McNab F., Leroux G., Strand F., Thorell L., Bergman S., Klingberg T. Common and unique components of inhibition and working memory: an fMRI, within-subjects investigation. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:2668-2682.
40. Miyake A., Friedman N.P., Emerson M.J., Witzki A.H., Howerter A., Wager T.D. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognit. Psychol. 2000, 41:49-100.
41. Mostofsky S.H., Simmonds D.J. Response inhibition and response selection: two sides of the same coin. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:751-761.
42. Nee D.E., Wager T.D., Jonides J. Interference resolution: insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2007, 7:1-17.
43. Neubert F.-X., Mars R.B., Buch E.R., Olivier E., Rushworth M.F.S. Cortical and subcortical interactions during action reprogramming and their related white matter pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107:13240-13245.
44. Nigg J.T. On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychol. Bull. 2000, 126:220-246.
45. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
46. Rubia K., Russell T., Overmeyer S., Brammer M., Bullmore E., Sharma T., Simmons A., Williams S., Giampietro V., Andrew C. Mapping motor inhibition: conjunctive brain activations across different versions of Go/no-go and stop tasks. Neuroimage 2001, 13:250-261.
47. Rubia K., Smith A.B., Brammer M.J., Taylor E. Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection. Neuroimage 2003, 20:351-358.
48. Rushworth M.F., Krams M., Passingham R.E. The attentional role of the left parietal cortex: the distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2001, 13:698-710.
49. Rushworth M.F., Ellison A., Walsh V. Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:656-661.
50. Rushworth M.F.S., Walton M.E., Kennerley S.W., Bannerman D.M. Action sets and decisions in the medial frontal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:410-417.
51. Schachar R., Logan G.D., Robaey P., Chen S., Ickowicz A., Barr C. Restraint and cancellation: multiple inhibition deficits in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2007, 35:229-238.
52. Schiff S., Bardi L., Basso D., Mapelli D. Timing spatial conflict within the parietal cortex: a TMS study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:3998-4007.
53. Sebastian A., Gerdes B., Feige B., Klöppel S., Lange T., Philipsen A., van Tebartz Elst L., Lieb K., Tüscher O. Neural correlates of interference inhibition, action withholding and action cancelation in adult ADHD. Psychiatry Res. 2012, 202:132-141.
54. Sharp D.J., Bonnelle V., de Boissezon X., Beckmann C.F., James S.G., Patel M.C., Mehta M.A. Distinct frontal systems for response inhibition, attentional capture, and error processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107:6106-6111.
55. Simon J.R., Berbaum K. Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: the 'Stroop effect' vs. the 'Simon effect'. Acta Psychol. 1990, 73:159-170.
56. Swann N.C., Cai W., Conner C.R., Pieters T.A., Claffey M.P., George J.S., Aron A.R., Tandon N. Roles for the pre-supplementary motor area and the right inferior frontal gyrus in stopping action: Electrophysiological responses and functional and structural connectivity. Neuroimage 2012, 59:2860-2870.
57. Swick D., Ashley V., Turken A.U. Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks. Neuroimage 2011, 56:1655-1656.
58. Thesen S., Heid O., Mueller E., Schad L.R. Prospective acquisition correction for head motion with image-based tracking for real-time fMRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000, 44:457-465.
59. Tzourio-Mazoyer N., Landeau B., Papathanassiou D., Crivello F., Etard O., Delcroix N., Mazoyer B., Joliot M. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002, 15:273-289.
60. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:418-424.
61. Verbruggen F., Liefooghe B., Notebaert W., Vandierendonck A. Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition. Acta Psychol. 2005, 120:307-326.
62. Verbruggen F., Aron A.R., Stevens M.A., Chambers C.D. Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107:13966-13971.
63. Wendelken C., Ditterich J., Bunge S.A., Carter C.S. Stimulus and response conflict processing during perceptual decision making. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2009, 9:434-447.
64. Wittchen H., Zaudig M., Frydrich T. Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV (SKID-I und SKID-II) 1997, Hogrefe, Göttingen.
65. Zaitsev M., Hennig J., Speck O. Point spread function mapping with parallel imaging techniques and high acceleration factors: fast, robust, and flexible method for echo-planar imaging distortion correction. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004, 52:1156-1166.
66. Zheng D., Oka T., Bokura H., Yamaguchi S. The key locus of common response inhibition network for no-go and stop signals. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:1434-1442.