Effect of strength and direction of haptic cueing on steering control during near lane departure

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 16, Issue , 2013, Pages 92-103

  Deroo, Mathieu ^a   Hoc, Jean Michel ^a   Mars, Franck ^a  

^a ECOLE CENTRALE DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Haptics; Lane departure warning systems; Steering behaviour

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; WHEELS;

COGNITIVE CONTROL; COGNITIVE PROCESS; DRIVING ASSISTANCE; FASTEST RESPONSE; HAPTICS; LANE-DEPARTURE-WARNING SYSTEMS; STEERING CONTROL; STEERING MOVEMENTS;

AUTOMOBILE STEERING EQUIPMENT;

EID: 84867596135     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.08.015     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Quin, Y. L. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036-1060. (Pubitemid 39375086)
2. Azzi, S., Reymond, G., Mérienne, F., & Kemeny, A. (2011). Eco-driving performance assessment with in-car visual and haptic feedback assistance. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 11, 041005.
3. Beruscha, F., Augsburg, K., & Manstetten, D. (2011). Haptic warning signals at the steering wheel: A literature survey regarding lane departure warning systems. Haptics: The Electronic Journal of Haptics Research, 4, 16-18.
4. Beruscha, F., Wang, L., Augsburg, K., & Wandke, H. (2010). Do drivers steer toward or away from lateral directional vibrations at the steering wheel? In J. Krems, T. Petzoldt, & M. Henning (Eds.), Proceedings of European conference on human centred design for intelligent transport systems. HUMANIST Publications, Lyon.
5. Boy, F., & Sumner, P. (2010). Tight coupling between positive and reversed priming in the masked prime paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 892-905.
6. Brookhuis, K. A., de Waard, D., & Fairclough, S. H. (2003). Criteria for driver impairment. Ergonomics, 46, 433-445. (Pubitemid 36581956)
7. Cooke, J. D. (1980). The organization of simple, skilled movements. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behaviour (pp. 199-212). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
8. de Rosario, H., Louredo, M., Díaz, I., Soler, A., Juan Gil, J., Solaz, J. S., et al (2010). Efficacy and feeling of a vibrotactile frontal collision warning implemented in a haptic pedal. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 13, 80-91.
9. Deroo, M., Hoc, J. M., & Mars, F. (2012). Influence of risk expectation on haptically cued corrective manoeuvres during lane departure. Ergonomics, 55, 465-475.
10. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2003). Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological Psychology, 64, 7-26. (Pubitemid 37346137)
11. Griffiths, P. G., & Gillespie, R. B. (2005). Sharing control between humans and automation using haptic interface: Primary and secondary task performance benefits. Human Factors, 47, 574-590.
12. Guiard, Y. (1983). The lateral coding of rotations: A study of the Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 331-342. (Pubitemid 14174121)
13. Ho, C., Tan, H. Z., & Spence, C. (2006). Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front to rear-end collisions in a driving simulator. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 988-996. (Pubitemid 44015636)
14. Hoc, J. M., & Amalberti, R. (2007). Cognitive control dynamics for reaching a satisficing performance in complex dynamic situations. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 1, 22-55.
15. Hoc, J. M., Young, M. S., & Blosseville, J. M. (2009). Cooperation between drivers and automation: Implications for safety. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10, 135-160.
16. Kuge, N., Boer, E. R., Yamamura, T., Ward, N. J., & Manser, M. P. (2006). Study on driver's car following abilities based on an active haptic support function. SAE technical paper 2006-01-0344. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/ 2006-01-0344.
17. Kullack, A., Ehrenpfordt, I., Lemmer, K., & Eggert, F. (2008). ReflektAS: Lane departure prevention system based on behavioural control. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2, 285-293.
18. Kullack, A., Ehrenpfordt, I., & Eggert, F. (2010). REFLEKTAS - Further tests of a fast and reliable lane departure prevention system for critical situations. In Proceedings of the 16th ITS world congress and exhibition on intelligent transport systems and services (pp. 6). Stockholm, Sweden.
19. Lechner, D., Delanne, Y., Schaefer, G., & Schmitt, V. (1997). Méthodologie de validation du logiciel de dynamique automobile CALLAS. SIA 970202. In Congrés SIA Lyon, Avril 1997. Reprinted in Ingénieurs de l'automobile No713, May 1997.
20. Lecoutre, B., & Poitevineau, J. (2005). Le logiciel "LePAC". La Revue de Modulad, 33(whole volume). 〈http://www.univ- rouen.fr/LMRS/Persopage/Lecoutre/PubBL.html〉. Accessed 03.01.12 (English version).
21. Najm, W. G., Smith, J. D., & Yanagisawa, M. (2007). Pre-crash scenario typology for crash avoidance research (tech. rep. DOT-HS-810 767). Washington, DC: National Highway Transportation Safety Administration Research.
22. Navarro, J., Mars, F., Forzy, J., El-Jaafari, M., & Hoc, J. (2010). Objective and subjective evaluation of motor priming and warning systems applied to lateral control assistance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 904-912.
23. Navarro, J., Mars, F., & Hoc, J. M. (2007). Lateral control assistance for car drivers: A comparison of motor priming and warning systems. Human Factors, 49, 950-960. (Pubitemid 47442114)
24. Navarro, J., Mars, F., & Young, M. S. (2011). Lateral control assistance in car driving: Classification, review and future prospects. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 5, 207-220.
25. Onimaru, S., & Kitazaki, M. (2010), Visual and tactile information to improve drivers performance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE virtual reality conference (VR) (pp. 295-296), Waltham, Massachusetts.
26. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T., & Wickens, C. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 30, 286-297.
27. Prochazka, A., Clarac, F., Loeb, G. E., Rothwell, J. C., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2000). What do reflex and voluntary mean? Modern views on an ancient debate. Experimental Brain Research, 130, 417-432. (Pubitemid 30088401)
28. Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
29. Rouanet, H. (1996). Bayesian methods for assessing importance of effects. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 149-158. (Pubitemid 126021389)
30. Rouanet, H., & Lecoutre, B. (1983). Specific inference in ANOVA: From significance tests to Bayesian procedures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 36, 252-268.
31. Stanley, L. M. (2006). Haptic and auditory interfaces as collision avoidance technique during roadway departures and driver perception of these modalities. Doctoral dissertation, Montana State University, Montana.
32. Sumner, P. (2007). Negative and positive masked-priming - Implications for motor inhibition. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 317-326.
33. Suzuki, K., & Jansson, H. (2003). An analysis of driver's steering behaviour during auditory or haptic warnings for the designing of lane departure warning system. Japan Society of Automotive Engineers Review, 24, 65-70.
34. UNECE (2007). Statistics of road traffic accidents in Europe and North America (pp. 46-61) (51st ed.). Geneva: UNECE.
35. Wilson, A. D., Tresilian, J. R., & Schlaghecken, F. (2010). Continuous priming effects on discrete response choices. Brain and Cognition, 74, 152-159.