Lateral control assistance for car drivers: A comparison of motor priming and warning systems

Human Factors

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 950-960

  Navarro, Jordan ^a   Mars, Franck ^a,b   Hoc, Jean Michel ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE EN COMMUNICATIONS ET CYBERNÉTIQUE DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALARM SYSTEMS; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; VIBRATION ANALYSIS;

LATERAL CONTROL ASSISTANCE; MOTOR PRIMING; SENSORI MOTORS; WARNING DEVICES;

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS;

ADULT; ALARM MONITORING; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CAR DRIVING; CONTROL SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRAFFIC SAFETY; VIBRATION SENSE;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROTECTIVE DEVICES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SOUND; VIBRATION;

EID: 34548850319     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872007X230280     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Enriquez, M. J., & MacLean, K. E. (2004). Impact of haptic warning signal reliability in a time-and-safety-critical task. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems (IEEE-VR2004; pp. 407-415). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
2. Espié, S. (1999). Vehicle-driven simulator versus traffic-driven simulator: The INRETS approach. In Proceedings of the Europe Driving Simulation Conference, France [CD-ROM]. Vandoeuvrelès-Nancy Cedex, France: Institute for Scientific and Technical Information of the French National Center for Scientific Research (INIST-CNRS).
3. Griffiths, P., & Gillespie, R. B. (2005). Sharing control between humans and automation using haptic interface: Primary and secondary task performance benefits. Human Factors, 47, 574-590.
4. Ho, C., Tan, H. Z., & Spence, C. (2005). Using spatial vibro-tactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes. Transportation Research - Part F, 8, 397-412.
5. Hoc, J. M. (2001). Towards a cognitive approach to human-machine cooperation in dynamic situations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54, 509-540.
6. Hoc, J. M., & Blosseville, J. M. (2003). Cooperation between drivers and in-car automatic driving assistance. In G. C. van der Veer & J. F. Hoorn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Cognitive Science Approaches to Process Control: Cognition and Collaboration - Distributed Cognition in Complex Processes 2003 (pp. 17-22). New York: Association for Computing Machinery Press.
7. Hoc, J. M., Mars, F., Milleville-Pennel, I., Jolly, E., Netto, M., & Blosseville, J. M. (2006). Evaluation of human-machine cooperation modes in car driving for safe lateral control in bends: Function delegation and mutual control modes. Le Travail Humain, 69, 153-182.
8. Kovordányi, R., Ohlsson, K., & Alm, T. (2005). Dynamically deployed support as a potential solution to negative behavioral adaptation. In Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium sponsored by the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Society (pp. 613-618). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
9. Lecoutre, B., & Poitevineau, J. (1992). Programme d'Analyse des Comparaisons (PAC) [Comparison Analysis Program]. Saint-Mandé, France: Groupe CISIA Ingénierie.
10. Netto, M. S., Labayrade, R., Ieng, S. S., Lusetti, B., Blosseville, J. M., & Mammar, S. (2003, November). Different modes on shared lateral control. Paper presented at the 10th Intelligent Transport Systems World Congress, Madrid, Spain.
11. Rimini-Doering, M., Altmueller, T., Ladstaetler, U., & Rossmeier, M. (2005). Effects of lane departure warning on drowsy drivers' performance and state in a simulator. In Driving Assessment 2005, Proceedings of the Third International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (pp. 88-95). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa/Public Policy Center.
12. Rouanet, H. (1996). Bayesian methods for assessing importance of effects. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 149-158.
13. Sayer, T. B., Sayer, J. R., & Devonshire, J. M. (2005). Assessment of a driver interface for lateral drift and curve speed warning systems: Mixed results for auditory and haptic warnings. In Driving Assessment 2005, Proceedings of the Third International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (pp. 218-224). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa/Public Policy Center.
14. Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2004). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Suzuki, K., & Jansson, H. (2003). An analysis of driver's steering behaviour during auditory or haptic warnings for the designing of Iane departure warning system. Japan Society of Automotive Engineers Review, 24, 65-70.
16. van Erp, J. B. F., & van Veen, H. A. H. C. (2004). Vtbrotactile in-vehicle navigation system. Transportation Research - Part F, 7, 247-256.
17. van Winsum, W., & Godthelp, H. (1996). Speed choice and steering behavior in curve driving. Human Factors, 38, 434-441.
18. Wickens, C. D., & Gosney, J. L. (2003). Redundancy, modality, priority and instructions in dual task interference between simulated vehicle control and in-vehicle technology (Tech. Rep. AHFD-03-18/ GM-03-3). Savoy, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Aviation Research Lab.