Tight coupling between positive and reversed priming in the masked prime paradigm

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 892-905

  Boy, Frederic ^a   Sumner, Petroc ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action; Motor inhibition; Negative compatibility effect; Perception; Subliminal priming

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; EGO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MALE; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SUBLIMINAL STIMULATION; UNCONSCIOUS (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954626775     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0017173     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bavelier D., Deruelle C., Proksch J. Positive and negative compatibility effects. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:100-112.
2. Bennett J.D., Lleras A., Oriet C., Enns J.T. A negative compatibility effect in priming of emotional faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:908-912.
3. Bowman H., Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. A neural network model of inhibitory processes in subliminal priming. Visual Cognition 2006, 13:401-480.
4. Boy F., Clarke K., Sumner P. Mask stimulus triggers inhibition in subliminal visuomotor priming. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 190:111-116.
5. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1737-1747.
6. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological Psychology 2003, 64(1-2):7-26.
7. Guthrie E.R. The psychology of learning 1952, Smith, Gloucester, MA.
8. Hochhaus L., Johnston J.C. Perceptual repetition blindness effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:355-366.
9. Huber D.E. Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:324-347.
10. Huber D.E., Shiffrin R.M., Lyle K.B., Ruys K.I. Perception and preference in short-term word priming. Psychological Review 2001, 108:652.
11. Huber D.E., Shiffrin R.M., Quach R., Lyle K.B. Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short-term priming: 1. Effects of prime duration and prime recognition. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30:745-757.
12. Jaskowski P. The effect of nonmasking distractors on the priming of motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:456-468.
13. Jaskowski P. The negative compatibility effect with nonmasking flankers: A case for mask-triggered inhibition hypothesis. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:765-777.
14. Jaskowski P. Negative compatibility effect: The object-updating hypothesis revisited. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 193:157-160.
15. Jaskowski P., Przekoracka-Krawczyk A. On the role of mask structure in subliminal priming. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis 2005, 65:409-417.
16. Jaskowski P., Slosarek M. How important is a prime's gestalt for subliminal priming?. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16:485-497.
17. Johnston J.C., Hochhaus L., Ruthruff E. Repetition blindness has a perceptual locus: Evidence from online processing of targets in RSVP streams. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:477-489.
18. Klapp S.T. Two versions of the negative compatibility effect: Comment on Lleras and Enns (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:431-435.
19. Klapp S.T., Hinkley L.B. The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131:255-269.
20. Leuthold H., Kopp B. Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials. Psychological Science 1998, 9:263-269.
21. Lingnau A., Vorberg D. The time course of response inhibition in masked priming. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67:545-557.
22. Lleras A., Enns J.T. Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:475-493.
23. Lleras A., Enns J.T. Updating a cautionary tale of masked priming: Reply to Klapp (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:436-440.
24. Lleras A., Enns J.T. How much like a target can a mask be? Geometric, spatial, and temporal similarity in priming: A reply to Schlaghecken and Eimer (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135:495-500.
25. Naccache L., Blandin E., Dehaene S. Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science 2002, 13:416-424.
26. Neumann O., Klotz W. Motor-responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli-Where is the limit of direct parameter specification. Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing 1994, 123-150. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. C. Umiltà, M. Moscovitch (Eds.).
27. Praamstra P., Seiss E. The neurophysiology of response competition: Motor cortex activation and inhibition following subliminal response priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:483-493.
28. Schlaghecken F., Blagrove E., Maylor E.A. Incidental learning of S-R contingencies in the masked prime task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:1177-1188.
29. Schlaghecken F., Bowman H., Eimer M. Dissociating local and global levels of perceptuo-motor control in masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:618-632.
30. Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. The influence of subliminally presented primes on response preparation. Sprache & Kognition 1997, 16(3-4):166-175.
31. Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:1367-1382.
32. Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Perception & Psychophysics 2002, 64:148-162.
33. Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. Active masks and active inhibition: A comment on Lleras and Enns (2004) and on Verleger, Jaskowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135:484-494.
34. Sohrabi, A., & West, R. L. (2008, July 23-26). A biologicallly-plausible cognitive model (BPCM) of positive and negative congruency effects in masked priming. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Washington, DC.
35. Sumner P. Negative and positive masked-priming-Implications for motor inhibition. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2007, 3:317-326.
36. Sumner P. Mask-induced priming and the negative compatibility effect. Experimental Psychology 2008, 55:133-141.
37. Sumner P., Brandwood T. Oscillations in motor priming: Positive rebound follows inhibitory phase in the masked prime paradigm. Journal of Motor Behavior 2008, 40:484-490.
38. Sumner P., Tsai P.C., Yu K., Nachev P. Attentional modulation of sensorimotor processes in the absence of perceptual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 2006, 103:10520-10525.
39. Tucker M., Ellis R. Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica (Amsterdam) 2004, 116:185-203.
40. van Leeuwen C., Lachmann T. Negative and positive congruence effects in letters and shapes. Perception & Psychophysics 2004, 66:908-925.
41. Verleger R., Jaskowski P., Aydemir A., van der Lubbe R.H., Groen M. Qualitative differences between conscious and nonconscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:494-515.