Online communication on climate change and climate politics: A literature review

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 527-543

  Schäfer, Mike S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

CLIMATE SCIENTISTS; LITERATURE REVIEWS; NUMBER OF PEOPLES; ON-LINE COMMUNICATION; RESEARCH FIELDS; SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION; SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTIONS; SOCIAL MEDIA;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; LITERATURE REVIEW; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 84867593232     PISSN: 17577780     EISSN: 17577799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.191     Document Type: Review

References (165)

1. Moser SC. Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Clim Change 2010, 1:31-53. doi:10.1002/wcc.11.
2. Carvalho A. Media(ted)discourses and climate change: a focus on political subjectivity and (dis)engagement. WIREs Clim Change 2010, 1:172-179. doi:10.1002/ wcc.13.
3. Anderson A. Sources, media, and modes of climate change communication: the role of celebrities. WIREs Clim Change 2011, 2:535-546. doi:10.1002/wcc.119.
4. Smith J. Dangerous news: media decision making about climate change risk. Risk Anal 2005, 25:1471-1482. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924. 2005.00693.x.
5. Carvalho A. Climate Change as a 'grand narrative'. JCOM 2010, 9:C03.
6. Lynn J. Internet Users to Exceed 2 Billion. London: Reuters; 2010.
7. O'Reilly T. What Is Web 2.0. Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software, O'Reilly Media; 2004.
8. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons 2010, 53:59-68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
9. Lietsala K, Sirkkunen E. Social Media. Introduction to the tools and processes of participatory economy. Tampere: University of Tampere; 2008, 191. Available at: http://tampub.uta.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/65560/978-951-44-7320-3.pdf?sequence=1.
10. Schmidt J. Das neue Netz. UVK Medien: Konstanz; 2011, 214.
11. Comscore. It's a Social World. Top 10 Need-to-Knows About Social Networking and Where It's Headed, Comscore: Reston; 2011.
12. Oates S. An Introduction to Media and Politics. London: Sage; 2008, 240.
13. Peterson I. Touring the scientific web. Sci Commun 2001, 22:246-255. doi:10.1177/107554700102200- 3002.
14. Jahangir Ikram M, Akram AA. Air pollution monitoring through an Internet-based network of volunteers. Environ Urban 2007, 19:225-241. doi:10.1177/0956247807076924.
15. Pielke Jnr R. 2012, Experten in blogs. Positive und negative Aspekte Forschungsj Soziale Bewegungen 2012, 25:79-83.
16. Barjak F. The role of the Internet in informal scholarly communication. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 2006, 57:1350-1367. doi:10.1002/asi.20454.
17. Amichai-Hamburger Y, McKenna KYA, Tal S-A. E-empowerment: empowerment by the internet. Comput Human Behav 2008, 24:1776-1789. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.002.
18. Gerhards J, Schäfer MS. Is the internet a better public sphere? Comparing old and new media in Germany and the US. New Media Soc 2010, 12:143-160. doi:10.1177/1461444809341444.
19. di Gennaro C, Dutton W. The internet and the public: online and offline political participation in the United Kingdom. Parliam Aff 2006, 59:299-313. doi:10.1093/pa/gsl004.
20. Diani M. Social movement networks virtual and real. Inform Commun Soc 2000, 3:386-401. doi:10.1080/13691180051033333.
21. Gibson RK, Lusoli W, Ward S. Online participation in the UK: testing a 'contextualised' model of internet effects. Brit J Polit Int Relat 2005, 7:561-583. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2005.00209.x.
22. OfCom-Office of Communications. New News, Future News. The Challenges for Television News after Digital Switch-Over. London: UK Office of Communications; 2007, 74.
23. Sunstein C. Republic.com. Princeton & London: Princeton University Press; 2001, 224.
24. Lessig L. Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin; 2004, 368.
25. Minol K, Spelsberg G, Schulte E, Morris N. Portals, blogs and co.: the role of the Internet as a medium of science communication. Biotechnol J 2007, 2:1129-1140. doi:10.1002/biot.200700163.
26. Anderson A. Media, politics and climate change: towards a new research agenda. Sociol Compass 2009, 3:166-182. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00188.x.
27. DeLuca KM. Greenpeace international media analyst reflects on communicating climate change. Environ Commun J Nat Culture 2009, 3:263-269.
28. Nelkin D. Selling Science. How The Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1995, 217.
29. Rödder S, Weingart P, Franzen M. The Sciences' Media Connection-Communication to the Public and its Repercussions. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011.
30. O'Neill S, Boykoff M. The role of new media in engaging individuals with climate change. In: Whitmarsh L, O'Neill SJ, Lorenzoni I, eds. Engaging the Public with Climate Change: Communication and Behaviour Change.London: Earthscan; 2011, 233-251.
31. Krauss W. Ausweitung der Kampfzone. Die Klima-Blogosphäre. Forschungsj Soziale Bewegungen 2012, 25:81-87.
32. Technorati. Technorati.com, 2012.
33. Bonetta L. Scientists enter the blogosphere. Cell 2007, 129:443-445. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.032.
34. Bentley C. Rise of the Geoblogosphere. Washington, DC: Presentation at the Geological Society of Washington; 2008.
35. Ashlin A, Ladle RJ. Environmental science adrift in the blogosphere. Science 2006, 312:201. doi:10.1126/science.1124197.
36. Trench B. Scientists' blogs: glimpses behind the scenes. In: Rödder S, Weingart P, Franzen M, eds. The Sciences' Media Connection-Communication to the Public and its Repercussions Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011, 273-289.
37. Bonetta L. Should you be tweeting? Cell 2009, 139:452-453. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.017.
38. Bray D, Storch Hv. CliSci2008: A Survey of the Perspectives of Climate Scientists Concerning Climate Science and Climate Change, GKSS-Forschungszentrum Geesthacht (GKSS Working Paper 2010/9): Geesthacht, 2010.
39. Geißler L. The State of the Geoblogosphere-Geoscience Communication in the Social Web, 2011.
40. Clegg Smith K, Friedman Singer R, Edsall Kromm E. Getting cancer research into the news: a communication case study centered on one U.S. comprehensive cancer center. Sci Commun 2010, 32:202-231. doi:10.1177/1075547009344976.
41. Lederbogen U, Trebbe J. Promoting science on the web: public relations for scientific organizations-results of a content analysis. Sci Commun 2003, 24:333-352. doi:10.1177/1075547002250299.
42. Geißler L. Willkommen in der Geoblogosphäre, 2009.
43. Hannula KA. Women-in-geoscience and blogs presentation: the blog version, 2009. Available at: http://scienceblogs.com/stressrelated/2009/12/30/women-in-geoscience-and-blogs/. (Accessed August 28, 2012).
44. Hannula KA, Jefferson A, Campell PB, Franks SE. Blogs as a resource and social support network for women geoscientists. Abstracts with Programs. Geol Soc Am 2009, 41:539. Available at: https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2009AM/finalprogram/abstract_161556.htm. (Accessed May 27, 2012).
45. Lockwood A. Seeding doubt: how sceptics use new media to delay action on climate change. Association for Journalism Education (AJE) Annual Conference 'New Media, New Democracy?', Sheffield University; 2008.
46. Ravetz J. Sociology of science: keep standards high. Nature 2012, 481:25. doi:10.1038/481025a.
47. Nentwich M. Cyberscience 2.0 oder 1.2? Das Web 2.0 und die Wissenschaft, 2009. Available at: http://oeaw.academia.edu/MichaelNentwich/Papers/239632/Cyberscience_2.0_Oder_1.2 (Accessed August 28, 2012).
48. Ferree MM, Gamson WA, Gerhards J, Rucht D. Shaping Abortion Discourse. Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002, 350.
49. Neidhardt F. Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen. In: Neidhardt F, ed. Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag; 1994, 7-41.
50. Horton D. Local environmentalism and the Internet. Environ Polit 2004, 13:734-753. doi:10.1080/ 0964401042000274304.
51. Gavin NT. Pressure group direct action on climate change: the role of the media and the web in Britain-a case study. Brit J Polit Int Relat 2010, 12:459-475. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00411.x.
52. Liu J. Picturing a green virtual public space for social change: a study of Internet activism and Web-based environmental collective actions in China. Chin J Commun 2011, 4:137-166. doi:10.1080/ 17544750.2011.565674.
53. Greenberg J, Knight G, Westersund E. Spinning climate change: corporate and NGO public relations strategies in Canada and the United States. Int Commun Gazette 2011, 73:65-82. doi:10.1177/ 1748048510386742.
54. Pickerill J. Weaving a green web: environmental protest and computer-mediated communication in Britain. In: Webster F, ed. Culture and Politics in the Information Age: A New Politics?.London: Routledge; 2001, 142-166.
55. Brunsting S, Postmes T. Social movement participation in the digital age-predicting offline and online collective action. Small Group Res 2002, 33:525-554. doi: 10.1177/104649602237169.
56. Hall NL, Taplin R. Room for climate advocates in a coal-focused economy? NGO influence on Australian climate policy. Austral J Social Iss 2008, 43:359-379.
57. Yang G. Weaving a green web: the internet and environmental activism in China. China Environ Ser 6:89-93.
58. Zelwietro J. The politicization of environmental organizations through the Internet. Inform Soc 1998, 14:45-55.
59. Seo H, Kim JY, Yang S-U. Global activism and new media: a study of transnational NGOs' online public relations. Public Relat Rev 2009, 35:123-126. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.02.002.
60. Stein L. Social movement web use in theory and practice: a content analysis of US movement websites. New Media Soc 2009, 11:749-771. doi:10.1177/1461444809105350.
61. Doyle J. Climate action and environmental activism. In: Boyce T, Lewis J, eds. Climate Change and the Media. New York: Peter Lang; 2009, 103-116.
62. Aelst PV, Walgrave S. New media, new movements? The role of the internet in shaping the 'anti-globalization' movement. Inform Commun Soc 2002, 5:465-493. doi:10.1080/1369118022000028142.
63. Baringhorst S. Introduction: political campaigning in changing media cultures-typological and historical approaches. In: Baringhorst S, Kneip V, Niesyto J, eds. Political Campaigning on the Web. Bielefeld: Transcript; 2009, 9-30.
64. Stein L. Environmental website production: a structuration approach. Media Culture Soc 2011, 33:363-384. doi:10.1177/0163443710394898.
65. Jun J. How climate change organizations utilize websites for public relations. Public Relat Rev 2011, 37:245-249. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.04.001.
66. Nisbet MC, Kotcher JE. A two-step flow of influence? Opinion-leader campaigns on climate change. Sci Commun 2009, 30:328-354. doi:10.1177/ 1075547008328797.
67. Lester L, Hutchins B. Power games: environmental protest, news media and the internet. Media Culture Soc 2009, 31:579-595. doi:10.1177/ 0163443709335201.
68. Reber B, Kim JY. How activist groups use websites in media relations: Evaluating online press rooms. J Public Relat Res 2006, 18:313-333. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1804_2.
69. Yeon H, Choi Y, Kiousis S. Interactive communication features on nonprofit organizations' webpages for the practice of excellence in public relations. J Website Promot 2005, 1:61-83. doi:10.1300/J238v01n04_06.
70. Castells M. Communication Power. London: Oxford University Press; 2011, 592.
71. Cottle S. Reporting demonstrations: the changing media politics of dissent. Media Culture Soc 2008, 30:853-872.
72. Kavada A. Activism transforms digital: the social movement perspective. In: Joyce M, ed. Digital Activism Decoded. New York & Amsterdam: International Debate and Education Association; 2010, 101-118.
73. Scharl A. Environmental Online Communication. London: Springer London Ltd; 2004, 298.
74. Ward SJ, Gibson RK, Lusoli W. Online participation and mobilisation in Britain: hype, hope and reality. Parliam Aff 2003, 56:652-668. doi:10.1093/ pa/gsg108.
75. Costanza-Chock S. Mapping the repertoire of electronic contention. In: Opel A, Pomper D, eds. Representing Resistance-Media, Civil Disobedience, and the Global Justice Movement. Westport: Praeger; 2003, 173-191.
76. Mercea D. Digital prefigurative participation: the entwinement of online communication and offline participation in protest events. New Media Soc 2012, 14:153-169. doi:10.1177/1461444811429103.
77. Fanenbruck G. The role of new media in protest organisation. A case study of 'the wave' climate change protest in London, UK, 5th December 2009, Masters Thesis, Faculty of History and Arts, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, 2010.
78. Jenkins JC. Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annu Rev Sociol 1983, 1983:527-553.
79. Kitschelt H. Resource mobilization theory: a critique. In: Rucht D, ed. Research on Social Movements. Campus & Westview: Frankfurt & Boulder; 1991, 323-347.
80. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N. Global Warming's Six Americas. New Haven: Yale University and George Mason University; 2010, 58.
81. Pickerill J. Cyberprotest: Environmental Activism Online. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2003, 224.
82. Askanius T, Uldam J. Online social media for radical politics: climate change activism on YouTube. Int J Electron Govern 2011, 4:69-84. doi:10.1504/ IJEG.2011.041708.
83. Schäfer MS. Hacktivism? Online-Medien und Social Media als Instrumente der Klimakommunikation zivilgesellschaftlicher Akteure. Forschungsj Soziale Bewegungen 2012, 2012:68-77.
84. Pillay K, Maharaj M, An Overview of Web 2.0 Social Media as a tool for advocacy. Proceedings of the Conference 'Scoring IT education goals in 2010' of the Southern African Computer Lecturers' Association, Pretoria, June 7-9, 2010.
85. Malone TW, Klein M. Harnessing collective intelligence to address global climate change. Innovations 2007, 2007:15-26.
86. Howes M. Reflexive modernisation, the internet, and democratic environmental decision making. Organ Environ 2002, 15:328-331. doi:10.1177/ 1086026602153010.
87. Hill KA, Hughes JE. Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 1998, 220.
88. Bruns A, Burgess JE, Crawford K, Shaw F. #qldfloods and @QPSMedia: Crisis Communication on Twitter in the 2011 South East Queensland Floods. ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation, Brisbane, 2012.
89. Revi A. Climate change risk: an adaptation and mitigation agenda for Indian cities. Environ Urban 2008, 20:207-229. doi:10.1177/0956247808089157.
90. Sampei Y, Aoyagi-Usui M. Mass-media coverage, its influence on public awareness of climate-change issues, and implications for Japan's national campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Global Environ Change 2009, 19:203-212. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.005.
91. Kievik M, Gutteling J. Yes, we can: motivate Dutch citizens to engage in self-protective behavior with regard to flood risks. Nat Hazard 2011, 59:1475-1490. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9845-1.
92. Nord L, Strömbäck J. When a natural disaster becomes a political crisis: a study of the 2004 tsunami and Swedish political communication. In: Kivikuru U, Nord L, eds. After the Tsunami: Crisis Communication in Finland and Sweden. Göteborg: Nordicom; 2009, 17-40.
93. Zavestoski S, Shulman S, Schlosberg D. Democracy and the environment on the internet: electronic citizen participation in regulatory rulemaking. Sci Technol Human Values 2006, 31:383-408. doi:10.1177/0162243906287543.
94. McCright AM, Dunlap RE. Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement counter-claims. Social Prob 2000, 47:499-522.
95. McCright AM, Dunlap RE. Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement's impact on US climate change policy. Social Prob 2003, 50:348-373.
96. Schlichting I. Strategic framing of climate change by industry actors: a literature review. Environ Commun J Nat Culture. In press.
97. Isenmann R, Lenz C. Internet use for corporate environmental reporting: current challenges-technical benefits-practical guidance. Business Strat Environ 2002, 11:181-202. doi:10.1002/bse.329.
98. Isenmann R. In: Jonker J, Witte M, eds. CSR Online: Internet Based Communication Management Models for Corporate Social Responsibility. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2006, 247-254.
99. Jose A, Lee S-M. Environmental reporting of global corporations: a content analysis based on website disclosures. J Business Ethics 2007, 72:307-321. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9172-8.
100. Morhardt JE. Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the internet. Business Strat Environ 2010, 19:436-452. doi:10.1002/ bse.657.
101. Cho CH, Roberts RW. Environmental reporting on the internet by America's toxic 100: legitimacy and self-presentation. Int J Account Inf Syst 2010, 11:1-1616. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2009.12.003.
102. Patten DM, Crampton W. Legitimacy and the internet: an examination of corporate web page environmental disclosures. Adv Environ Account Manage 2003, 2:31-57. doi:10.1016/S1479-3598(03) 02002-8.
103. Rodríguez Bolívar MP. Evaluating corporate environmental reporting on the internet. Business Soc 2009, 48:179-205. doi:10.1177/0007650307305370.
104. Chaudhri V, Wang J. Communicating corporate social responsibility on the internet. Manage Commun Quart 2007, 21:232-247. doi:10.1177/ 0893318907308746.
105. Aly D, Simon J, Hussainey K. Determinants of corporate internet reporting: evidence from Egypt. Manage Audit J 2010, 25:182-202. doi:10.1108/ 02686901011008972.
106. Adams ST. Critiquing claims about global warming from the World Wide Web: a comparison of high school students and specialists. Bull Sci Technol Soc 1999, 19:539-543. doi:10.1177/ 027046769901900610.
107. Union of Concerned Scientists. A Climate of Corporate Control. How Corporations Have Influenced the U.S. Dialogue on Climate Science and Policy. Cambridge: Union of Concerned Scientists; 2012, 72.
108. Smerecnik KR, Renegar VR. Capitalistic agency: the rhetoric of BP's helios power campaign. Environ Commun J Nat Culture 2010, 4:152-171. doi:10.1080/17524031003760879.
109. McNutt K, Marchildon G. Think tanks and the web: measuring visibility and influence. Canad Public Policy Anal Polit 2009, 35:219-236.
110. Gavin NT, Marshall T. Mediated climate change in Britain: Scepticism on the web and on television around Copenhagen. Global Environ Chan Hum Policy Dimen 2011, 21:1035-1044. doi:10.1016/ j.gloenvcha.2011.03.007.
111. Holliman R. Advocacy in the tail: exploring the implications of 'climategate' for science journalism and public debate in the digital age. Journalism 2011, 12:832-846. doi:10.1177/1464884911412707.
112. PEW Research Center. PEJ New Media Index, April 4-8, 2011, Japan and Global Warming Top the Bloggers' Agenda, 2011.
113. PEW Research Center. PEJ New Media Index, February 20-24, 2012, Bloggers Debate Global Warming and Scientific Ethics, 2012.
114. PEW Research Center. PEJ New Media Index, June 13-17, 2011, Angry Bloggers Ask, 'Where's the Money?', 2011.
115. PEW Research Center. PEJ New Media Index, June 27-July 2011, Social Media Users Debate a Tea Party Favorite, 2011.
116. Schäfer MS, Ivanova A, Schmidt A. Globaler Klimawandel, globale Öffentlichkeit? Medienaufmerksamkeit für den Klimawandel in 23 Ländern. Stud Commun Media 2011, 1:131-148.
117. Felt U, Nowotny H, Taschwer K. Wissenschaftsforschung Eine Einführung, Campus: Frankfurt a M, 1995, 322.
118. Gregory J, Miller S. Science in Public. Communication, Culture, and Credibility. New York: Plenum; 1998, 304.
119. Lewenstein BV. Science and the media. In: Jasanoff S, Markle GE, Petersen JC, Pinch T, eds. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, London & New Delhi: Sage; 1995, 343-360.
120. Irwin A, Wynne B. Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996, 244.
121. Ladle R, Jepson P, Whittaker R. Scientists and the media: the struggle for legitimacy in climate change and conservation science. Interdiscip Sci Rev 2005, 30:231-240. doi:10.1179/030801805X42036.
122. Gavin N. The Web and Climate Change Politics Lessons from Britain? In: Boyce T, Lewis J, eds. Climate Change and the Media. New York: Peter Lang; 2009, 129-142.
123. Barr S. Climate forums: virtual discourses on climate change and the sustainable lifestyle. Area 2011, 43:14-22. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00958.x.
124. Holmes T. Balancing acts PR, 'impartiality' and power in mass media coverage of climate change. In: Boyce T, Lewis J, eds. Climate Change and the Media. New York: Peter Lang; 2009, 92-100.
125. Ryghaug M, Holtan Sørensen K, Næss R. Making sense of global warming: Norwegians appropriating knowledge of anthropogenic climate change. Public Understand Sci 2011, 20:778-795. doi:10.1177/ 0963662510362657.
126. Krauss W, Schäfer MS, von Storch H. Post-normal climate science. Nat Culture 7:121-132.
127. Tereick J. YouTube als Diskursplattform. Herausforderungen der Diskurslinguistik am Beispiel 'Klimawandel'. Hamburger Hefte Medienkultur 2011, 12:59-68. doi:10.3167/nc.2012.070201.
128. Scharl A, Weichselbraun A. Building a web-based knowledge repository on climate change to support environmental communities. In: Lytras M, DePablos PO, Ziderman A, Roulstone A, Maurer H, Imber J, eds. Organizational, Business, and Technological Aspects of the Knowledge Society Pt Ii. 2010, 79-84.
129. McNutt K. Policy on the web: the climate change virtual policy network. Canad Polit Sci Rev 2008, 2:1-151.
130. Rogers R, Zelman A. Surfing for knowledge in the information society. In: Elmer G, Abramson BD, Breen M, eds. Critical Perspectives on the Internet.Rowman & Littlefield. 2002, 63-86.
131. Rogers R, Marres N. Landscaping climate change: a mapping technique for understanding science and technology debates on the World Wide Web. Public Understand Sci 2000, 9:141-163. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/304.
132. Sullivan J, Xie L. Environmental activism, social networks and the internet. China Quart 2009, 198:422-432. doi:10.1017/S0305741009000381.
133. Holliman R. Media coverage of cloning: a study of media content, production and reception. Public Understanding Sci 2004, 13:107-130. doi:10.1177/0963662504043862.
134. Straus SG. Technology, group process, and group outcomes: testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Hum Comput Interact 1997, 12:227-265. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1203_1.
135. Eurobarometer. Special Eurobarometer 364-Public Awareness and Acceptance of CO2 capture and storage. Brussels: Report. European Commission; 2011.
136. Synovate. Climate Change Global Study 2010, In: Deutsche Welle Global Media Forum, Bonn; 2010.
137. Stamm KR, Clark F, Eblacas PR. Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: the case of global warming. Public Understand Sci 2000, 9:219-237. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/302.
138. Pandve HT, Chawla PS, Fernandez K, Singru SA, Khismatrao D, Pawar S. Assessment of awareness regarding climate change in an urban community. Indian J Occupat Environ Med 2011, 15:109-112. doi:10.4103/0019-5278.93200.
139. Chay S, Sasaki N. Using online tools to assess public responses to climate change mitigation policies in Japan. Future Internet 2011, 3:117-129. doi:10.3390/fi3020117.
140. Weinreich F. Nutzen- und Belohnungsstrukturen computergestützter Kommunikationsformen. Zur Anwendung des Uses and Gratifications Approach in einem neuen Forschungsfeld. Publizistik 1998, 43, Heft 2:130-142.
141. Shah DV, McLeod DM, Gotlieb MR, Lee N. Framing and agenda setting. In: Nabi R, Oliver MB, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Media Processes and Effects.Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2009, 83-98.
142. Perloff RM. The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communication and Attitudes in the 21st Century. New York: Routledge; 2010, 448.
143. Peters HP, Heinrichs H. Öffentliche Kommunikation über Klimawandel und Sturmflutrisiken. Bedeutungskonstruktion durch Experten, Journalisten und Bürger. Forschungszentrum Jülich: Jülich; 2005.
144. Arlt D, Hoppe I, Wolling J. Climate change and media usage: effects on problem awareness and behavioural intentions. Int Commun Gazette 2011, 73:45-63. doi:10.1177/1748048510386741.
145. Zhao X. Media use and global warming perceptions. Commun Res 2009, 36:698-723. doi:10.1177/ 0093650209338911.
146. Kahlor L, Rosenthal S. If we seek, do we learn? Sci Commun 2009, 30:380-414. doi:10.1177/ 1075547008328798.
147. Taddicken M, Neverla I. Klimawandel aus Sicht der Mediennutzer. Multifaktorielles Wirkungsmodell der Medienerfahrung zur komplexen Wissensdomäne Klimawandel. Medien Kommunikationswissenschaft 2011, 505-525.
148. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizat Behav Human Decision Process 1991, 50:179-211.
149. Hakala S, Seeck H. Crisis and web-enabled agency in practice. In: Kivikuru U, Nord L, eds. After the Tsunami: Crisis Communication in Finland and Sweden.Göteborg: Nordicom; 2009, 171-187.
150. Schäfer MS, Ivanova A, Schlichting I, Schmidt A. Mediatisierung. Medienerfahrungen und -orientierungen deutscher Klimawissenschaftler. In: Neverla I, Schäfer MS, eds. Das Medien-Klima.Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2012, 233-252.
151. Waldrop MM. Science 2.0. Sci Am 2008, 298:68-73. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0508-68.
152. Nentwich M. Cyberscience: Research in the Age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press; 2003, 592.
153. Nentwich M. Cyberscience: Forschung im Zeitalter des Internet. Technikfolgenabschätzung 2003, 12:73-78.
154. Latour B, Woolgar S. Laboratory Life. The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1979, 296.
155. Rödder S, Schäfer MS. Repercussion and resistance: an empirical study in the interrelation between science and mass media. Communications 2010, 35:249-267. doi:10.1515/COMM.2010.014.
156. Hansen A. Communication, media and environment: towards reconnecting research on the production, content and social implications of environmental communication. Int Commun Gazette 2011, 73:7-25. doi:10.1177/1748048510386739.
157. Grundmann R. The legacy of climategate: revitalizing or undermining climate science and policy? WIREs Clim Change 2012, 3:281-288. doi:10.1002/ wcc.166.
158. Maibach E, Leiserowitz A, Cobb S, Shank M, Cobb KM, Gulledge J. The legacy of climategate: undermining or revitalizing climate science and policy? WIREs Clim Change 2012, 3:289-295. doi: 10.1002/wcc.168.
159. Hillje J, Quiring O. Klickaktivismus? Über die Wirkung von politischen Online-Kampagnen. Forschungsj Soziale Bewegungen 2012, 2012:99-104.
160. Endres D, Sprain L, Peterson TR. Social Movement to Address Climate Change: Local Steps for Global Action. Cambria: Amherst; 2009, 522.
161. Campbell S, Kwak N. Political involvement in 'mobilized' society: the interactive relationships among mobile communication, network characteristics, and political participation. J Commun 2011, 61:1005-1024. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466. 2011.01601.x.
162. Faucheux S, Nicolai I. IT for green and green IT: a proposed typology of eco-innovation. Ecol Econ 2011, 70:2020-2027. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011. 05.019.
163. Maxwell R, Miller T. The environment and global media and communication policy. In: Mansell R, Raboy M, eds. The Handbook of Global Media and Communication Policy. John Wiley & Sons; 2011, 467-485.
164. Maclin EM. The 2009 UN climate talks: alternate media and participation from anthropologists. Am Anthropol 2010, 112:464-466. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01257.x.
165. Koteyko N. Mining the internet for linguistic and social data: an analysis of 'carbon compounds' in Web feeds. Disc Soc 2010, 21:655-674. doi:10.1177/0957926510381220.