Do revised hip resurfacing arthroplasties lead to outcomes comparable to those of primary and revised total hip arthroplasties?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 470, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3134-3141

  Desloges, William ^a   Catelas, Isabelle ^b   Nishiwaki, Toru ^a   Kim, Paul R ^a   Beaulé, Paul E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; BLEEDING; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENDER; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 12; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WOMAC QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 84867571265     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2498-x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1788-1792.
2. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA, Wisk LE Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2663-2671.
3. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Wisk LE, Takamura KM. Complications after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2011;42:207-230, viii.
4. Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:735-741.
5. Beaule PE, Kim PR, Hamdi A, Fazekas A. A prospective metal ion study of large-head metal-on-metal bearing: a matched-pair analysis of hip resurfacing versus total hip replacement. Orthop Clin North Am. 2011;42:251-257, ix.
6. Beaule PE, Le Duff MJ, Dorey FJ, Amstutz HC. Fate of cementless acetabular components retained during revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2288-2293.
7. Corten K, MacDonald SJ. Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:351-357.
8. D'Agostino RB Jr. Tutorial in biostatistics: propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265-2281.
9. de Steiger RN, Miller LN, Prosser GH, Graves SE, Davidson DC, Stanford TE. Poor outcome of revised resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:72-76.
10. Eswaramoorthy VK, Biant LC, Field RE. Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91: 1454-1458.
11. Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP The John Charnley Award. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;468: 318-325.
12. Garrett SJ, Bolland BJ, Yates PJ, Gardner EM, Latham JM Femoral revision in hip resurfacing compared with large-bearing metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1214- 1218.
13. Grammatopolous G, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Gundle R, McLardy- Smith P, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Gill HS. Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1019-1024.
14. Kishida Y, Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yamaguchi K, Yoshikawa H. Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:185-189.
15. Lavigne M, Therrien M, Nantel J, Roy A, Prince F, Vendittoli PA. The John Charnley Award. The functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:426-436.
16. Maffiuletti NA, Impellizzeri FM, Widler K, Bizzini M, Kain MS, Munzinger U, Leunig M. Spatiotemporal parameters of gait after total hip replacement: anterior versus posterior approach. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:407-415.
17. Mahadevan D, Challand C, Keenan J. Revision total hip replacement: predictors of blood loss, transfusion requirements, and length of hospitalisation. J Orthop Traumatol. 2010;11: 159-165.
18. Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM, Ulrich SD, McGrath MS Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:66-71.
19. Newgard CD, Hedges JR, Arthur M, Mullins RJ. Advanced statistics: the propensity score: a method for estimating treatment effect in observational research. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11: 953-961.
20. Patil S, Garbuz DS, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP Quality of life outcomes in revision vs primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23: 550-553.
21. Petersen MK, Andersen NT, Mogensen P, Voight M, Soballe K Gait analysis after total hip replacement with hip resurfacing implant or Mallory-head Exeter prosthesis: a randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2011;35:667-674.
22. Robinson AH, Palmer CR, Villar RN. Is revision as good as primary hip replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:42-45.
23. Sandiford NA, Muirhead-Allwood SK, Skinner JA. Revision of failed hip resurfacing to total hip arthroplasty rapidly relieves pain and improves function in the early post operative period J Orthop Surg Res. 2010;5:88.
24. Shimmin A, Beaule PE, Campbell P. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:637-654.
25. Shimmin AJ, Beaule PE, Campbell PA. Current concepts: metal on metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:637- 654.
26. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Shears E, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:27-33.
27. Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, Roy AG, Lusignan D, Lavigne M. A comparison of clinical results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and 28 mm metal on metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomised trial with 3-6 years follow-up. Hip Int. 2010;20:1-13.