Poor outcome of revised resurfacing hip arthroplasty: 397 cases from the Australian Joint Replacement Registry

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 72-76

  De Steiger, Richard N ^a   Miller, Lisa N ^a   Prosser, Gareth H ^b   Graves, Stephen E ^a   Davidson, David C ^a   Stanford, Tyman E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISLOCATION; FEMUR FRACTURE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REGISTER; REOPERATION; RESURFACING HIP ARTHROPLASTY; SURVIVAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AUSTRALIA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HIP PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; AUSTRALIA; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77950500113     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453671003667176     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA; 2009.
2. Back D L, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; 87 (3): 324-329
3. Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Kwon Y M, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Beard D J, Murray D W, Gill H S. Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91 (8): 1019-1024
4. Heilpern G N, Shah N N, Fordyce M J. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90 (9): 1137-1142
5. Hing C B, Back D L, Bailey M, Young D A, Dalziel R E, Shimmin A J. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007; 89 (11): 1431-1438
6. Marulanda G A, Wilson M S, Edwards P, Raterman S. Early clinical experience with the use of the Birmingham hip resurfacing system. Orthopedics (12 Suppl 2) 2008; 31.
7. McMinn D J, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C J. Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing dysplasia component in severe acetabular insufficiency: a six- to 9.6-year follow-up. Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90 (6): 715-723
8. Ollivere B, Darrah C, Barker T, Nolan J, Porteous M J. Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91 (8): 1025-1030
9. O'Neill M, Beaule P E, Nasser A B, Garbuz D, Lavigne M, Duncan C, Kim P R, Schemitsch E. Canadian Academic Experience with Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009; 67 (2): 128-131
10. Steffen R T, Pandit H P, Palan J, Beard D J, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Murray D W, Gill H S. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90 (4): 436-441
11. Treacy R B, McBryde C W, Pynsent P B. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; 87 (2): 167-170