Comparing teachers’ strategies for supporting student inquiry in a problem-based multimedia-enhanced history unit

Theory and Research in Social Education

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 183-212

  Saye, John W ^a   Brush, Thomas ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867548709     PISSN: 00933104     EISSN: 21631654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2006.10473304     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Brush, T. & Saye, J. (2000). Implementation and evaluation of a student-centered learning unit: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development 48(3), 79-100.
2. Brush, T. & Saye, J. (2001). The use of embedded scaffolds with hypermedia-supported student-centered learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 10(4), 333-356.
3. Bain, R. B. (1995). The world history standards: A teacher’s perspective. Education Week, Feb. 22,34, 36.
4. Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching History for the Common Good. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Bennett, C., & Spaulding, E. (1992). Teaching the social studies. Multiple approaches for multiple perspectives. Theory and Research in Social Education 20(3), 263-292.
6. Berson, M. J. (1996). Effectiveness of computer technology in the social studies: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 28(4), 486-499.
7. Berson, M. J., Lee, J. K., & Stuckart, D. W. (2001). Promise and practice of computer technologies in the social studies: A critical analysis. In W. B. Stanley (Ed.), Critical issues in social studies research for the 21st century. (pp. 209-229). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
8. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of Learning Sciences 2(2), 141-178.
9. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1993). Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited. Educational Technology 33(3), 52-70.
10. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992). The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 65-80.
11. Cornett, J. W. (1990). Teacher thinking about curriculum and instruction: A case study of a secondary social studies teacher. Theory and Research in Social Education 18(3), 248-273.
12. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. New York, NY: D. C. Heath.
13. Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 159-199.
14. Doyle, W., & Ponder, G. (1977-1978). The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making. Interchange, 8(3), 1-12.
15. Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we've learned. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4-10.
16. Ehman, L. H., Glenn, A. D., Johnson, V., & White, C. S. (1992). Using computer databases in student problem solving. Theory & Research in Social Education, 20 (2), 179-206.
17. Evans, R. W. (1989). Teacher conceptions of history. Theory and Research in Social Education, 17(3), 210-240.
18. Engle, S., & Ochoa, A. (1988). Educating citizens for democracy: Decision-making in social studies. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
19. Evans, R. W. (1990). Teacher conceptions of history revisited: Ideology, curriculum, and student belief. Theory and Research in Social Education 18(2), 101-138.
20. Fickel, L. H. (1999). Democracy is messy: Exploring the beliefs and personal theories of a high school social studies teacher. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association: Montreal, Canada.
21. Gaudelli, B. (1999). Teacher as self: Understanding pedagogy in global education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the College and University Faculty Assembly of the National Council for the Social Studies, Orlando, FL.
22. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Gilligan, C., Ward, J.V., Taylor, J.M. (1988). Mapping the Moral Domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Grant, S. G., Gradwell, J., Lauricella, A. M., Derme-Insinna, A., Pullano, L., & Tzetzo, K. (2002). When increasing stakes need not mean increasing standards: The case of the New York state global history and geography exam. Theory and Research in Social Education 30(4), 488-515.
25. Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26. Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York, NY: McGrawHill.
27. Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Hickey, D.T., Moore, A.L., & Pellegrino, J.W. (2001). The motivational and academic consequences of elementary mathematics environments: Do constructivist innovations and reforms make a difference? American Educational Research Journal 38(3), 611-652.
29. Heilman, E. E. (2001). Teachers’ perspectives on real world challenges for social studies education. Theory and Research in Social Education 29(696-733).
30. Hertzburg, H. W. (1981). Social studies reform: 1890-1980. Boulder, CO: SSEC Publications.
31. Hynd, C., Hubbard, B., Holschuh, J., Reinking, D., Jacobson, M. (2000). Reading like a historian: Critical reading of multiple texts in a hypertext environment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
32. Honey, M. & Moeller, B. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs and technology integration: Different values, different understandings. Technical Report No. 6. New York, NY: Center for Technology in Education.
33. Hunt, M. P, & Metcalf, L. E. (1968). Teaching high school social studies: Problems in reflective thinking and understanding (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
34. Jacobsen, M. J., Maouiri, C., Mishra, P, & Kolar, C. (1996). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 5(3/4), 239-281.
35. Johnston, M. (1990). Teachers’ backgrounds and beliefs: influences in learning to teach in the social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education 18(3), 207-233.
36. Kagan, D. M. (1993). Laura and Jim and what they taught me about the gap between educational theory and practice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
37. Konopak, B., Wilson, E., & Readence, J. (1994). Examining teachers’ beliefs, decisions, and practices about content area reading in secondary social studies. In C. Kinzer & D. Leu (Eds.), Multidimensional aspects of literacy research, theory, and practice (pp. 127-136). Chicago, IL: NRC.
38. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher 28(2), 16-26, 46.
39. Land, S. & Zembal-Saul, C. (2003). Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of Progress Portfolio. Educational Technology Research and Development 51 (4), 65-84.
40. Linn, M., Shear, L., Bell, P., & Slotta, J.D. (1999). Organizing principles for science education partnerships: Case studies of students’ learning about 'rats in space' and 'deformed frogs.' Educational Technology Research and Development 47(2), 61-84.
41. Loh, B., Reiser, B., Radinsky, J., Edelson, D., Gomez, L., & Marshall, S. (2001). Developing reflective inquiry practices: A case study of software, the teacher, and students. In K. Crowley, C. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for Science: Implications from Everyday, Classroom, and Professional Settings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43. Makler, A. (1994). Social studies teachers’ conceptions of justice. Theory and Research in Social Education 22(3), 249-280.
44. Masterman, E. & Rogers, Y. (2002). A framework for designing interactive multimedia to scaffold young children’s understanding of historical chronology. Instructional Science 30, 221-241.
45. Merryfield, M. M. (1998). Pedagogy for global perspectives in education: Studies of teachers’ thinking and practice. Theory and Research in Social Education 26(3), 342-379.
46. Newmann, F. M. (1991a). Higher order thinking in the teaching of social studies: Connections between theory and practice. In J. Voss, D. Perkins, & J. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 381-400). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Newmann, F. M. (1991b). Classroom thoughtfulness and students’ higher order thinking: Common indicators and diverse social studies courses. Theory and Research in Social Education 19(4), 410-433.
48. Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
49. Oliver, D. W., & Shaver, J. P. (1966). Teaching public issues in the high school. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
50. Onosko, J. (1991). Barriers to the promotion of higher order thinking in social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education 19(4), 341-366.
51. Onosko, J., & Swenson, L. (1996). Designing issue-based unit plans. In R. W. Evans & D. W. Saxe (Eds.), Handbook on teaching social issues (pp. 89-98). Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
52. Parker, W. C., Mueller, M., & Wendling, L. (1989). Critical reasoning on civic issues. Theory and Research in Social Education 19(4), 7-32.
53. Pedersen, S. & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development 51(2), 57-76.
54. Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A., Dyke, J. V., & Gabrys, G. (1999). The sourcer’s apprentice: A program of research and development in history instruction. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
55. Rossi, J. A. (1995). In-depth study in an issues-centered social studies classroom. Theory and Research in Social Education 23(2), 87-120.
56. Rossi, J. A. & Pace, C.M. (1998). Issues-centered instruction with low achieving high school students: The dilemmas of two teachers. Theory and Research in Social Education 26(3), 380-409.
57. Saye, J. W. (1998a). Creating time to develop student thinking: Team-teaching with technology as an instructional partner. Social Education 62(6), 356-362.
58. Saye, J. W. (1998b). Technology in the classroom: The role of dispositions in teacher gatekeeping. Journal of Curriculum & Supervision 13(3), 210-234.
59. Saye, J. & Brush, T. (1999). Student engagement with social issues in a multimedia-supported learning environment. Theory and Research in Social Education 27(4), 472-504.
60. Saye, J. & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding Critical Reasoning about History and Social Issues in Multimedia-Supported Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 50(3), 77-96.
61. Saye, J. & Brush, T. (2004). Scaffolding problem-based teaching in a traditional social studies classroom. Theory and Research in Social Education 32 (3), 349-378.
62. Scheurman, G. (1998). From behaviorist to constructivist teaching. Social Education 62(1), 6-9.
63. Schlechty, P. (1993). On the frontier of school reform with trailblazers, pioneers, and settlers. Journal of Staff Development 14(4), 46-51.
64. Shaver, J. P. (1996). The prospects for issues-centered education. In R. W. Evans & D. W. Saxe (Eds.), Handbook on teaching social issues (pp. 380-386). Washington, DC: NCSS.
65. Shaver, J. P., Davis, O. L., & Helburn, S. W. (1979). The status of social studies education: Impressions from three NSF studies. Social Education 4(3), 150-153.
66. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 15(2), 4-14.
67. Spoehr, K., & Spoehr, L. (1994). Learning to think historically. Educational Psychologist 29(2), 71-77.
68. Thornton, S. J. (1991). Teacher as curricular-instructional gatekeeper in social studies. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 237-284). New York, NY: Macmillan.
69. VanSledright, B. (1996). Closing the gap between school and disciplinary history: Historian as high school teacher. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 6, pp. 257-289). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
70. Vinson, K. D. (1998). The “traditions" revisited: Instructional approach and high school. social studies teachers. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26(1), 50-82.
71. Wilson, S., & Wineburg, S. (1988). Peering at history from different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in the teaching of American history. Teachers’ College Record, 30, 729-769.
72. Wineburg, S., & Wilson, S. (1991). Subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of history. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 305-347). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
73. Yeager, E. A., & O. L. Davis, J. (1995). Between campus and classroom: Secondary student teachers thinking about historical texts. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29(1), 1-8.