Scaffolding problem-based teaching in a traditional social studies classroom

Theory and Research in Social Education

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 349-378

  Saye, John W ^a   Brush, Thomas ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47249141579     PISSN: 00933104     EISSN: 21631654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2004.10473259     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Bain, R. B. (1995). The world history standards: A teacher's perspective. Education Week, Feb. 22,34, 36.
2. Berson, M. J., Lee, J. K., & Stuckart, D. W. (2001). Promise and practice of computer technologies in the social studies: A critical analysis. In W. B. Stanley (Ed.), Critical issues in social studies research for the 21st century, (pp. 209-229). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
3. Bennett, C., & Spaulding, E. (1992). Teaching the social studies. Multiple approaches for multiple perspectives. Theory and Research in Social Education, 20(3), 263-292.
4. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of Learning Sciences 2(2), 141-178.
5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
6. Brush, T. A. & Saye, J. W. (2000). Implementation and evaluation of a student-centered learning unit: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 79-100.
7. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1993). Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited. Educational Technology, 33(3), 52-70.
8. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992). The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 65-80.
9. Cornett, J. W. (1990). Teacher thinking about curriculum and instruction: A case study of a secondary social studies teacher. Theory and Research in Social Education, 18(3), 248-273.
10. Cuban, L. (1984). How teachers taught. New York: Longmans.
11. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. New York: D. C. Heath.
12. Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research 52(2): 159-199.
13. Doyle, W., & Ponder, G. (1977-78). The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making. Interchange, 8(3), 1-12.
14. Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we've learned. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4-10.
15. Ehman, L. H., Glenn, A. D., Johnson, V., & White, C. S. (1992). Using computer databases in student problem solving. Theory & Research in Social Education, 20 (2), 179-206.
16. Engle, S., & Ochoa, A. (1988). Educating citizens for democracy: Decision-making in social studies. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Evans, R. W. (1989). Teacher conceptions of history. Theory and Research in Social Education, 17(3), 210-240.
18. Evans, R. W. (1990). Teacher conceptions of history revisited: Ideology, curriculum, and student belief. Theory and Research in Social Education, 18(2), 101-138.
19. Fickel, L. H. (1999). Democracy is messy: Exploring the beliefs and personal theories of a high school social studies teacher. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association: Montreal, Canada.
20. Gaudelli, B. (1999, November). Teacher as self: Understanding pedagogy in global education. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the annual meeting of the College and University Faculty Assembly of the National Council for the Social Studies, Orlando, FL.
21. Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Gordon, R. (1998). Balancing real-world problems with real world results. Phi Delta Kappan, 27(1), 390-393.
24. Grant, S. G., Gradwell, J., Lauricella, A. M., Derme-Insinna, A., Pullano, L., & Tzetzo, K. (2002). When increasing stakes need not mean increasing standards: The case of the New York state global history and geography exam. Theory and Research in Social Education, 30(4), 488-515.
25. Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models (Vol. 2). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Heilman, E. E. (2001). Teachers' perspectives on real world challenges for social studies education. Theory and Research in Social Education, 29(696-733).
27. Hertzburg, H. W. (1981). Social studies reform: 1890-1980. Boulder, CO: SSEC Publications.
28. Hynd, C., Hubbard, B., Holschuh, J., Reinking, D., Jacobson, M. (2000). Reading like a historian: Critical reading of multiple texts in a hypertext environment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
29. Honey, M. & Moeller, B. (1990). Teachers' beliefs and technology integration: Different values, different understandings. Technical Report No. 6. New York, NY: Center for Technology in Education.
30. Hunt, M. P, & Metcalf, L. E. (1968). Teaching high school social studies: Problems in reflective thinking and understanding (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
31. Jacobsen, M. J., Maouiri, C., Mishra, P., & Kolar, C. (1996). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(3/4), 239-281.
32. Johnston, M. (1990). Teachers' backgrounds and beliefs: influences in learning to teach in the social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education, 18(3), 207-233.
33. Kagan, D. M. (1993). Laura and Jim and what they taught me about the gap between educational theory and practice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
34. Kinzie, M., & Sullivan, H. (1989). Continuing motivation, learner control, and CAI. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(2), 5-14.
35. Konopak, B., Wilson, E., & Readence, J. (1994). Examining teachers' beliefs, decisions, and practices about content area reading in secondary social studies. In C. Kinzer & D. Leu (Eds.), Multidimensional Aspects of Literacy Research, Theory, and Practice (pp. 127-136). Chicago
36. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16-26, 46.
37. Land, S. & Zembal-Saul, C. (2003). Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explaniations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of Progress Portfolio. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51 (4), 65-84.
38. Loh, B., Reiser, B., Radinsky, J., Edelson, D., Gomez, L., & Marshall, S. (2001). Developing reflective inquiry practices: A case study of software, the teacher, and students. In K. Crowley, C. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for Science: Implications from Everyday, Classroom, and Professional Settings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Lortie, D. (1975). School-teacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Makler, A. (1994). Social studies teachers' conceptions of justice. Theory and Research in Social Education, 22(3), 249-280.
41. Masterman, E. & Rogers, Y. (2002). A framework for designing interactive multimedia to scaffold young children's understanding of historical chronology. Instructional Science, 30, 221-241.
42. McNeil, L. M. (1986). Contraditions of control: School structure and school knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
43. Merryfield, M. M. (1998). Pedagogy for global perspectives in education; Studies of teachers' thinking and practice. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26(3), 342-379.
44. Newmann, F. M. (1990). A test of higher-order thinking in social studies: Persuasive writing on constitutional issues using the NAEP approach. Social Education, 54(6), 369.
45. Newmann, F. M. (1991a). Promoting higher order thinking in social studies: Overview of a study of sixteen high school departments. Theory and Research in Social Education, 19(4), 324-340.
46. Newmann, F. M. (1991b). Higher order thinking in the teaching of social studies: Connections between theory and practice. In J. Voss, D. Perkins, & J. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 381-400). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Newmann, F. M., & Oliver, D. (1970). Clarifying public controversy: An approach to social studies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
48. Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11-39). New York: Teachers College Press.
49. Oliver, D. W., & Shaver, J. P. (1966). Teaching public issues in the high school. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
50. Onosko, J. (1991). Barriers to the promotion of higher order thinking in social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education, 19(4), 341-366.
51. Parker, W. C., Mueller, M., & Wendling, L. (1989). Critical reasoning on civic issues. Theory and Research in Social Education, 19(4), 7-32.
52. Pedersen, S. & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers' beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51 (2), 57-76.
53. Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A., Dyke, J. V., & Gabrys, G. (1999). The sourcer's apprentice: A program of research and development in history instruction. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
54. Perkins, D. N., Allen, R., & Hafner, J. (1983). Difficulties in everyday reasoning. In W. Maxwell (Ed.), Thinking: The expanding frontier (pp. 177-189). Philadelphia, PA: Franklin Institute.
55. Ringstaff, C., Sandholtz, J., & Dwyer, D. (1991). Trading places: When teachers utilize student expertise in technology-intensive classrooms. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association: Chicago, IL.
56. Rossi, J. A. (1995). In-depth study in an issues-centered social studies classroom. Theory and Research in Social Education, 23(2), 87-120.
57. Rossi, J. A. & Pace, C. M. (1998). Issues-centered instruction with low achieving high school students: The dilemmas of two teachers. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26(3), 380-409.
58. Saye, J. W. (1998a). Creating time to develop student thinking: Team-teaching with technology as an instructional partner. Social Education, 62(6), 356-362.
59. Saye, J. W. (1998b). Technology in the classroom: The role of dispositions in teacher gatekeeping. Journal of Curriculum & Supervision, 13(3), 210-234.
60. Saye, J. W. (2002). The Potential of Personal Technology for Empowering Democratic Decision Making. The International Social Studies Forum, 2(2), 191-194.
61. Saye, J. W. & Brush, T. (1999). Student engagement with social issues in a multimedia-supported learning environment. Theory and Research in Social Education, 27(4), 472-504.
62. Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77-96.
63. Saye, J.W. & Brush, T. (2004). Promoting civic competence through problem-based history learning experiments. In G.E. Hamot, J.J. Patrick, & R.S. Leming (Eds)., Civic Learning in Teacher Education (Vol. 3, pp. 123-145). Bloomington, IN: The Social Studies Development Center.
64. Scheurman, G. (1998). From behaviorist to constructivist teaching. Social Education, 62(1), 6-9.
65. Scheurman, G., & Newmann, F. M. (1998). Authentic intellectual work in social studies: putting performance before pedagogy. Social Education, 62(1), 21-35.
66. Schlechty, P. (1993). On the frontier of school reform with trailblazers, pioneers, and settlers. Journal of Staff Development, 14(4), 46-51.
67. Shaver, J. P. (1996). The prospects for issues-centered education. In R. W. Evans & D. W. Saxe (Eds.), Handbook on teaching social issues (pp. 380-386). Washington, D.C.: National Council for the Social Studies.
68. Shaver, J. P., Davis, O. L., & Helburn, S. W. (1979). The status of social studies education: Impressions from three NSF studies. Social Education, 4(3), 150-153.
69. Seixas, P. (1998). Student teachers thinking historically. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26(3), 310-341.
70. Shulman, L. S., & Carey, N. B. (1984). Psychology and the limitations of individual rationality: Implications for the study of reasoning and civility. Review of Educational Research, 54, 501-524.
71. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
72. Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J. C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
73. Spoehr, K., & Spoehr, L. (1994). Learning to think historically. Educational Psychologist, 29(2), 71-77.
74. Thornton, S. J. (1991). Teacher as curricular-instructional gatekeeper in social studies. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 237-284). New York: Macmillan.
75. VanSickle, R. L., & Hoge, J. D. (1991). Higher cognitive thinking skills in social studies: Concepts and critiques. Theory and Research in Social Education, 19(2), 152-17.
76. VanSledright, B. (1996). Closing the gap between school and disciplinary history: Historian as high school teacher. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 6, pp. 257-289). Greeenwich, CT: JAI Press.
77. Vinson, K. D. (1998). The “traditions" revisited: Instructional approach and h.s. social studies teachers. Theory and Research in Social Education.
78. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79. Wineburg, S. S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between the school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 495-519.
80. Wilson, S., & Wineburg, S. (1988). Peering at history from different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in the teaching of American history. Teachers' College Record, 30, 729-769.
81. Wineburg, S., & Wilson, S. (1991). Subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of history. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 305-347). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
82. Yeager, E. A., & O. L. Davis, J. (1995). Between campus and classroom: Secondary student teachers thinking about historical texts. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29(1), 1-8