Improved Inhibitor Screening Experiments by Comparative Analysis of Simulated Enzyme Progress Curves

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 10, 2012, Pages

  Tholander, Fredrik ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BESTATIN; ENZYME INHIBITOR; PEPTIDASE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DISSOCIATION CONSTANT; ENZYME KINETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; IC 50; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; ENZYME ASSAYS; ENZYME INHIBITORS; EPOXIDE HYDROLASES; KINETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84867374214     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046764     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Janzen WP, Bernasconi P (2009) High throughput screening: methods and protocols. Dordrecht; New York: Humana Press. xii, 268 p. p.
2. Hertzberg RP, Pope AJ, (2000) High-throughput screening: new technology for the 21st century. Curr Opin Chem Biol 4: 445-451.
3. Walters WP, Namchuk M, (2003) Designing screens: how to make your hits a hit. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2: 259-266.
4. Inglese J, Johnson RL, Simeonov A, Xia M, Zheng W, et al. (2007) High-throughput screening assays for the identification of chemical probes. Nat Chem Biol 3: 466-479.
5. Zhang JH, Chung TD, Oldenburg KR, (1999) A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays. J Biomol Screen 4: 67-73.
6. Wu G, Yuan Y, Hodge CN, (2003) Determining appropriate substrate conversion for enzymatic assays in high-throughput screening. J Biomol Screen 8: 694-700.
7. Duggleby RG, (2001) Quantitative analysis of the time courses of enzyme-catalyzed reactions. Methods 24: 168-174.
8. Barshop BA, Wrenn RF, Frieden C, (1983) Analysis of numerical methods for computer simulation of kinetic processes: development of KINSIM-a flexible, portable system. Anal Biochem 130: 134-145.
9. Dang Q, Frieden C, (1997) New PC versions of the kinetic-simulation and fitting programs, KINSIM and FITSIM. Trends Biochem Sci 22: 317.
10. Nikolova N, Tenekedjiev K, Kolev K, (2008) Uses and misuses of progress curve analysis in enzyme kinetics. Cent Eur J Biol 3: 345-350.
11. Kuzmic P, (2009) DynaFit-a software package for enzymology. Methods Enzymol 467: 247-280.
12. Kuzmic P, (1996) Program DYNAFIT for the analysis of enzyme kinetic data: application to HIV proteinase. Anal Biochem 237: 260-273.
13. Mendes P, (1993) GEPASI: a software package for modelling the dynamics, steady states and control of biochemical and other systems. Comput Appl Biosci 9: 563-571.
14. Mendes P, (1997) Biochemistry by numbers: simulation of biochemical pathways with Gepasi 3. Trends Biochem Sci 22: 361-363.
15. Hoops S, Sahle S, Gauges R, Lee C, Pahle J, et al. (2006) COPASI-a COmplex PAthway SImulator. Bioinformatics 22: 3067-3074.
16. Sportsman JR, Gaudet EA, Boge A, (2004) Immobilized metal ion affinity-based fluorescence polarization (IMAP): advances in kinase screening. Assay Drug Dev Technol 2: 205-214.
17. Hill CM, Waight RD, Bardsley WG, (1977) Does any enzyme follow the Michaelis-Menten equation? Mol Cell Biochem 15: 173-178.
18. Örning L, Krivi G, Fitzpatrick FA, (1991) Leukotriene A4 hydrolase. Inhibition by bestatin and intrinsic aminopeptidase activity establish its functional resemblance to metallohydrolase enzymes. J Biol Chem 266: 1375-1378.
19. Glaser E, Alikhani N, (2010) The organellar peptidasome, PreP: a journey from Arabidopsis to Alzheimer's disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1797: 1076-1080.
20. Fylstra D, Lasdon L, Watson J, Waren A, (1998) Design and Use of the Microsoft Excel Solver. INTERFACES 28: 29-55.