Encouraging the use of the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT): What the GKT has to offer law enforcement

Memory Detection: Theory and Application of the Concealed Information Test

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 12-24

  Iacono, William G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867354062     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511975196.002     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Ax, A. F. (1953). The physiological differentiation between fear and anger in humans. Psychosomatic Medicine, 15, 433-442.
2. Ben-Shakhar, G., and Elaad, E. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 131-151.
3. Ben-Shakar, G., and Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theories and Applications in the Detection of Deception. New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. Ben-Shakhar, G., Bar-Hillel, M., and Kremnitzer, M. (2002). Trial by polygraph: reconsidering the use of the guilty knowledge technique in court. Law & Human Behavior, 26, 527-541.
5. Farwell, L. A., and Donchin, E. (1991). The truth will out: interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 28, 531-547.
6. Hira, S., and Furumitsu, I. (2002). Polygraphic examinations in Japan: application to the guilty knowledge test in forensic investigations. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 4, 16-27.
7. Iacono, W. G. (2007). Detection of deception. In J. Cacioppo, L. Tassinary, and G. Berntson (eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology, 3rd edn. (pp. 688-703). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Iacono, W. G., and Lykken, D. T. (1997). The validity of the lie detector: two surveys of scientific opinion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 426-433.
9. Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385-388.
10. Lykken, D. T. (1960). The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: the effects of faking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 258-262.
11. Lykken, D. T. (1974). Psychology and the lie detector industry. American Psychologist, 29, 725-739.
12. Lykken, D. T. (1981). A Tremor in the Blood: Uses and Abuses of the Lie Detector. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Lykken, D. T. (1998). A Tremor in the Blood: Uses and Abuses of the Lie Detector, 2nd edn. New York: Plenum.
14. Meixner, J. B., and Rosenfeld, J. P. (2009). Countermeasure mechanisms in a P300-based concealed information test. Psychophysiology, 47, 57-65.
15. Nakayama, M. (2002). Practical use of the concealed information test from criminal investigation is Japan. In M. Kleiner (ed.), Handbook of Polygraph Testing (pp. 49-86). San Diego: Academic Press.
16. National Research Council. (2003). The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
17. Patrick, C. J., and Iacono, W. G. (1991). A comparison of field and laboratory polygraphs in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 28, 632-638.
18. Rosenfeld, J. P., Labkovsky, E., Winograd, M., Lui, M. A., Vandenboom, C., and Chedid, E. (2008). The Complex Trial Protocol (CTP): a new, countermeasure-resistant, accurate, P300-based method for detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology, 45, 906-919.
19. Schachter, J. (1957). Pain, fear, and anger in hypertensives and normotensives. Psychosomatic Medicine, 15, 433-442.