The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the guilty knowledge test: A meta-analytic review

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 131-151

  Ben Shakhar, Gershon ^a   Elaad, Eitan ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b ARIEL UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CRIME; FEMALE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; GUILT; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; META ANALYSIS; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; CRIME; FEMALE; GUILT; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; LIE DETECTION; MALE; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0037302143     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.131     Document Type: Article

References (180)

1. Allen, J. J., Iacono, W. G., & Danielson, K. D. (1992). The development and validation of an event-related-potential memory assessment procedure: A methodology for prediction in the face of individual differences. Psychophysiology, 29, 504-522.
2. Ansley, N. (1992). The history and accuracy of guilty knowledge and peak of tension tests. Polygraph, 21, 174-274.
3. Balloun, K. D., & Holmes, D. C. (1979). Effects of repeated examinations on the ability to detect guilt with a polygraphic examination: A laboratory experiment with a real crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 316-322.
4. Bamber, D. (1975). The area under the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12, 378-415.
5. Barland, G. H. (1997). Research in electrodermal biofeedback with stimulus tests. Polygraph, 26, 1-37.
6. Beijk, J. (1980). Experimental and procedural influences on differential electrodermal activity. Psychophysiology, 17, 274-278.
7. Ben-Shakhar, G. (1977). A further study of the dichotomization theory in detection of information. Psychophysiology, 14, 408-413.
8. Ben-Shakhar, G. (1991). Clinical judgment and decision making in CQT polygraphy: A comparison with other pseudoscientific applications in psychology. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26, 232-240.
9. Ben-Shakhar, G. (1994). The roles of stimulus novelty and significance in determining the electrodermal orienting response: Interactive versus additive approaches. Psychophysiology, 31, 402-411.
10. Ben-Shakhar, G. (2002). A critical review of the Control Questions Test (CQT). In M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 103-126). London: Academic Press.
11. Ben-Shakhar, G., Bar-Hillel, M., & Kremnitzer, M. (2002). Trial by polygraph: Reconsidering the use of the GKT in court. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 527-541.
12. Ben-Shakhar, G., Bar-Hillel, M., & Lieblich, I. (1986). Trial by polygraph: Scientific and juridical issues in lie detection. Behavioral Science and the Law, 4, 459-479.
13. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Dolev, K. (1996). Psychophysiological detection through the guilty knowledge technique: Effects of mental countermeasures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 273-281.
14. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2002). The Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT) as an application of psychophysiology: Future prospects and obstacles. In M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (87-102). London: Academic Press.
15. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2002). Effects of questions' repetition and variation on the efficiency of the guilty knowledge test: A reexamination. Journal of Applied Psychology: 87, 972-977.
16. Ben-Shakhar, G., Frost, R., Gati, I., & Kresh, Y. (1996) Is an apple a fruit? Semantic relatedness as reflected by psychophysiological responsivity. Psychophysiology, 33, 671-679.
17. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception: A psychophysiological and international perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.
18. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Gati, I. (1987). Common and distinctive features of verbal and pictorial stimuli as determinants of psychophysiological responsivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 91-105.
19. Ben-Shakhar, G., Gati, I., & Salamon, N. (1995). Generalization of the orienting response to significant stimuli: The roles of common and distinctive stimulus components. Psychophysiology, 32, 36-42.
20. Ben-Shakhar, G., Gronau, N., & Elaad, E. (1999). Leakage of relevant information to innocent examinees in the GKT: An attempt to reduce false-positive outcomes by introducing target stimuli. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 651-660.
21. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Lieblich, I. (1982). The dichotomization theory for differential autonomic responsivity reconsidered. Psychophysiology, 19, 277-281.
22. Ben-Shakhar, G., Lieblich, I., & Bar-Hillel, M. (1982). An evaluation of polygrapher's judgments: A review from a decision theoretic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 701-713.
23. Ben-Shakhar, G., Lieblich, I., & Kugelmass, S. (1970). Guilty knowledge technique: Application of signal detection measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 409-413.
24. Ben-Shakhar, G., Lieblich, I., & Kugelmass, S. (1975). Detection of information and GSR habituation: An attempt to derive detection efficiency from two habituation curves. Psychophysiology, 12, 283-288.
25. Ben-Shakhar, G., Lieblich, I., & Kugelmass, S. (1982). Interactive effects of stimulus probability and significance on the skin conductance response. Psychophysiology, 19, 112-114.
26. Berlyne, D. E. ( 1960). Conflict arousal and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Bernstein, A. S. (1979). The orienting response as a novelty and significance detector: Reply to O'Gorman. Psychophysiology, 16, 263-273.
28. Bradley, M. T., & Ainsworth, D. (1984). Alcohol and the psychophysiological detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 21, 63-71.
29. Bradley, M. T., & Janisse, M. P. (1981). Accuracy demonstration, threat, and the detection of deception: Cardiovascular, electrodermal, and pupillary measures. Psychophysiology, 18, 307-315.
30. Bradley, M. T., MacLaren, V. V., & Carle, S. B. (1996). Deception and nondeception in guilty knowledge and guilty action polygraph tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 153-160.
31. Bradley, M. T., & Rettinger, J. (1992). Awareness of crime-relevant information and the Guilty Knowledge Test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 55-59.
32. Bradley, M. T., & Warfield, J. F. (1984). Innocence, information, and the guilty knowledge test in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 21, 683-689.
33. Carlton, B. L., & Smith, B. J. (1991). The effects of aural versus visual presentations of questions during a detection of deception task (Report No. DoDPI91-R-0002). Ft. McClellan, AL: Department of Defense Polygraph Institute.
34. Cohen, J. E. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Cutrow, R. J., Parks, A., Lucas, N., & Thomas, K. (1972). The objective use of multiple physiological indices in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 9, 578-587.
36. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical., 113 C. Ct. Supp. 2786 (1993).
37. Davidson, P. O. (1968). Validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effect of motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 62-65.
38. Davis, R. C. (1961). Physiological responses as a means of evaluating information. In A. D. Biderman & H. Zimmer (Eds.), The manipulation of human behavior (pp. 142-168). New York: Wiley.
39. Dawson, M. E., Filion, D. L., & Schell, A. M. (1989). Is elicitation of the autonomic orienting response associated with allocation of processing resources? Psychophysiology, 26, 560-572.
40. Day, D. A., & Rourke, B. P. (1974). The role of attention in "lie-detection." Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 6, 270-276.
41. DePaulo, B. M., & Kirkendol, S. E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 51-70). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
42. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (in press). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin.
43. DePaulo, B. M., & Pfeifer, R. L. (1986). On the job experience and skill at detecting deception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 249-267.
44. DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J. I., & Lassiter, G. D. (1985). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 323-370). New York: McGraw-Hill.
45. Diaz, R. (1985). The effects of pre-experimental expectancy, opinion, and demonstration of accuracy on physiological detection of information. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Ohio.
46. Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913-920.
47. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Frank, M.G. (1999). A few can catch a liar? Psychological Science, 10, 263-266.
48. Elaad, E. (1987). Psychophysiological detection in the Guilty Knowledge Test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
49. Elaad, E. (1990). Detection of guilty knowledge in real-life criminal investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 521-529.
50. Elaad, E. (1993). The role of guessing and verbal response type in psychophysiological detection of concealed information. Journal of Psychology, 127, 455-464.
51. Elaad, E. (1994). The accuracy of human decisions and objective measurements in psychophysiological detection of knowledge. Journal of Psychology, 128, 267-280.
52. Elaad, E. (1997). Polygraph examiner awareness of crime-relevant information and the Guilty Knowledge Test. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 107-120.
53. Elaad, E. (1998). The challenge of the concealed knowledge polygraph test. Expert Evidence, 6, 161-187.
54. Elaad, E., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1989). Effects of motivation and verbal response type on psychophysiological detection of information. Psychophysiology, 26, 442-451.
55. Elaad, E., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1991). Effects of mental countermeasures on psychophysiological detection in the Guilty Knowledge Test. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 11, 99-108.
56. Elaad, E., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1997). Effects of item repetitions and variations on the efficiency of the Guilty Knowledge Test. Psychophysiology, 34, 587-596.
57. Elaad, E., Bonwitt, G., Eisenberg, O., & Meytes, I. (1982). Effects of beta, blocking drugs on the polygraph detection rate: A pilot study. Polygraph, 11, 225-233.
58. Elaad, E., Ginton, A., & Jungman, N. (1992). Detection measures in real-life criminal guilty knowledge tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 757-767.
59. Ellson, D. C., Burke, C. G., Davis, R. C., & Saltzman, I. J. (1952). A report of research on detection of deception (Contract NG onr-18011). Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research.
60. Farwell, L. A., & Donchin, E. (1991). The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 28, 531-547.
61. Filion, D. L., Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Hazlett, E. A. (1991). The relationship between skin conductance orienting and the allocation of processing resources. Psychophysiology, 28, 410-424.
62. Forman, R. F., & McCauley, C. (1986). Validity of the positive control polygraph test using the field practice model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 691-698.
63. Fukumoto, J. (1980). A case in which the polygraph was the sole evidence for conviction. Polygraph, 9, 42-44.
64. Furedy, J. J., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1991). The role of deception, intention to deceive, and motivation to avoid detection in the psychophysiological detection of guilty knowledge. Psychophysiology, 28, 163-171.
65. Furedy, J. J., Davis, C., & Gurevich, M. (1988). Differentiation of deception as a psychological process: A psychophysiological approach. Psychophysiology, 25, 683-688.
66. Furedy, J. J., & Heslegrave, R. J. (1991). The forensic use of the polygraph: A psychophysiological analysis of current trends and future prospects. In J.R. Jennings, P.K. Ackles, & M.G.H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology (Vol. pp. 157-189). Greenwich, CT: Jessica Kingsley.
67. Furedy, J. J., Gigliotti, F., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1994). Electrodermal differentiation of deception: The effect of choice vs. no choice of deceptive items. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 13-22.
68. Furedy, J. J., Posner, R., & Vincent, A. (1991). Electrodermal differentiation of deception: Memory-difficulty and perceive-accuracy manipulations. Psychophysiology, 28, 163-171.
69. Furumitsu, I. (1999). Laboratory investigations in the psychophysiological detection of deception. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
70. Gaines, K. H. (1992). Utility and numerical evaluation of the guilty Knowledge Test. (Report No. DoDPI92-R-0004) Ft. McClellan, AL: Department of Defense Polygraph Institute.
71. Gati, I., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1990). Novelty and significance in orientation and habituation: A feature-matching approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 251-263.
72. Gati, I., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Avni-Liberty, S. (1996). Stimulus novelty and significance in electrodermal orienting responses: The effects of adding versus deleting stimulus components. Psychophysiology, 33, 637-643.
73. Geldreich, E. W. (1941). Studies of the use of the galvanic skin response as a deception indicator. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 44, 346-351.
74. Geldreich, E. W. (1942). Further studies of the use of the galvanic skin response as a deception indicator. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 45, 279-284.
75. Giesen, M., & Rollison, M. A. (1980). Guilty knowledge versus innocent associations: Effects of trait anxiety and stimulus context on skin conductance. Journal of Research in Personality, 14, 1-11.
76. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
77. Greenwald, A. G. (1981). Self and memory. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 201-236). New York: Academic Press.
78. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1981). Some psychological determinants of electrodermal responses to deception. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Surrey, United Kingdom.
79. Gudjonsson, G. H., & Haward, R. C. (1982). Detection of deception: Consistency in responding and personality. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 1189-1190.
80. Gustafson, L. A., & Orne, M. T. (1963). Effects of heightened motivation on the detection of deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 408-411.
81. Gustafson, L. A., & Orne, M. T. (1964). The effect of task and method of stimulus presentation on the detection of deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48, 383-387.
82. Gustafson, L. A., & Orne, M. T. (1965a). Effects of perceived role and role success on the detection of deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 412-417.
83. Gustafson, L. A., & Orne, M. T. (1965b). The effects of verbal responses on the laboratory detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 7, 10-14.
84. Honts, C. R., Devitt, M. K., Winbush, M., & Kircher, J. C. (1996). Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of the concealed knowledge test. Psychophysiology, 33, 84-92.
85. Honts, C. R., Raskin, D. C., & Kircher, J. C. (1987). Effects of physical countermeasures and their electromyographic detection during polygraph tests for deception. Journal of Psychophysiology, 1, 241-247.
86. Honts, C. R., Raskin, D. C., & Kircher, J. C. (1994). Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of polygraph tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 252-259.
87. Horneman, C. J., & O'Gorman, J. G. (1985). Detectability in the card test as a function of the subject's verbal response. Psychophysiology, 22, 330-333.
88. Horneman, C. J., & O'Gorman, J. G. (1987). Individual differences in psychophysiological responsiveness in laboratory tests of deception. Personality and individual differences, 8, 321-330.
89. Horowitz, S. W., Kircher, J. C., & Raskin, D. (1986). Does stimulation test accuracy predict accuracy of polygraph tests? [Abstract] Psychophysiology, 23, 442.
90. Horvath, F. (1978). An experimental comparison of the psychological stress evaluator and the galvanic skin response in detection of deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 338-344.
91. Horvath, F. (1979). Effect of different motivational instructions on detection of deception with the psychological stress evaluator and the galvanic skin response. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 323-330.
92. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
93. Iacono, W. G., Boisvenu, G. A., & Fleming, J. A. (1984). Effects of diazepam and methylphenidate on the electrodermal detection of guilty knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 289-299.
94. Iacono, W. G., Cerri, A. M., Patrick, C. J., & Fleming, J. A. (1992). Use of antianxiety drugs as countermeasures in the detection of guilty knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 60-64.
95. Iacono, W. G., & Lykken, D. T. (1997a). The scientific status of research on polygraph techniques: The case against polygraph tests. In D. L. Faigman, D. H. Kaye, M. J. Saks, & J. Sanders (Eds.), Modern scientific evidence volume: The law and science of expert testimony (pp. 582-618). St. Paul, MN: West Group.
96. Iacono, W. G., & Lykken, D. T. (1997b). The validity of the lie detector: Two surveys of scientific opinion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 426-433.
97. Iacono, W. G., & Lykken, D. T. (1999). Update: The scientific status of research on polygraph techniques: The case against polygraph tests. In D. L. Faigman, D. H. Kaye, M. J. Saks, & J. Sanders (Eds.), Modern scientific evidence, volume 1: The law and science of expert testimony (pp. 174-184) St. Paul, MN West Group.
98. Jones, H. E., & Salter, S. (1989). Polygraph accuracy: An analog study. Polygraph, 18, 69-74.
99. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
100. Kihlstorm, J. F., & Cantor, N. (1984). Mental representations of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 2-47). New York: Academic Press.
101. Kihlstorm, J. F., Cantor, N., Albright, J. S., Chew, B. R., Klein, S. B., & Niedenthal, P. M. (1988). Information processing and the study of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 145-177). New York: Academic Press.
102. Kleinmuntz, B., & Szucko, J. J. (1984). Lie detection in ancient and modern times: A call for contemporary scientific study. American Psychologist, 39, 766-776.
103. Konieczny, S., Fras, M., & Widacki, J. (1984). The specificity of so-called emotional traces and certain features of personality in the polygraph examination. The Journal of Forensic Medicine and Criminology, 34, 25-30.
104. Krapohl, D. (1994). The detection of information with items of high or low personal significance using a polygraph: Effects of motivation. Polygraph, 23, 242-250.
105. Kraut, R. E., & Poe, D. (1980). Behavioral roots of person perception: The deception judgments of customs inspectors and laymen. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 784-798.
106. Kubis, J. F. (1962). Studies in lie detection: Computer feasibility considerations (Report No. 62-205, prepared for the Air Force Systems Command, Contract No. AF 30 (602)-2270, Project No. 5534) New York: Fordham University.
107. Kugelmass, S., & Lieblich, I. (1966). Effects of realistic stress and procedural interference in experimental lie detection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 211-216.
108. Kugelmass, S., & Lieblich, I. (1968). An analysis of mechanisms underlying psychophysiological detection. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Applied Psychology, Amsterdam, 509-512.
109. Kugelmass, S., Lieblich, I., Ben-Ishai, A., Opatowski, A., & Kaplan, M. (1968). Experimental evaluation of galvanic skin response and blood pressure change indices during criminal interrogation. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 59, 632-635.
110. Kugelmass, S., Lieblich, I., & Bergman, Z. (1967). The role of "lying" in psychophysiological detection. Psychophysiology, 3, 312-315.
111. Kunzendorf, R. G., & Bradbury, J. L. (1983). Better liars have better imaginations. Psychological Reports, 52, 634.
112. Lahri, F. K., & Ganguly, A. K. (1978). An experimental study of the accuracy of polygraph technique in diagnosis of deception with volunteer and criminal subjects. Polygraph, 7, 89-94.
113. Larson, J. A. (1932). Lying and its detection: A study of deception and deception tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
114. Lieblich, I., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Kugelmass, S. (1976). Validity of the guilty knowledge technique in a prisoners' sample. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 89-93.
115. Lieblich, I., Kugelmass, S., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1970). Efficiency of GSR detection of information as a function of stimulus set size. Psychophysiology, 6, 601-608.
116. Lieblich, I., Naftali, G., Shmueli, J., & Kugelmass, S. (1974). Efficiency of GSR detection of information with repeated presentation of series of stimuli in two motivational states. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 113-115.
117. Lubow, R. E., & Fein, O. (1996), Pupillary size in response to a visual guilty knowledge test: New technique for the detection of deception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 164-177.
118. Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385-388.
119. Lykken, D. T. (1960). The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of faking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 258-262.
120. Lykken, D. T. (1974). Psychology and the lie detector industry. American Psychologist, 29, 725-739.
121. Lykken, D. T. (1978). The psychopath and the lie detector. Psychophysiology, 15, 137-142.
122. Lykken, D. T. (1979). The detection of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 47-53.
123. Lykken, D. T. (1991). Why (some) Americans believe in the lie detector while others believe in the guilty knowledge test. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26, 214-222.
124. Lykken, D. T. (1998). A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector New York: Plenum Press.
125. MacLaren, V. V. (2001). A quantitative review of the Guilty Knowledge Test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 674-683.
126. Maltzman, I. (1979). Orienting reflexes and significance: A reply to O'Gorman. Psychophysiology, 16, 274-281.
127. Marston, W. M. (1917). Systolic blood pressure changes in deception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 143-163.
128. Marston, W. M. (1938). The lie detector test. New York: Smith.
129. Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 81-97.
130. Moroney, W. E., & Zenhausern, R. J. (1972). Detection of deception as a function of galvanic skin response recording methodology. Journal of Psychology, 80, 255-262.
131. Nakayama, M. (2002). Practical use of the concealed information test for criminal investigation in Japan. In M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 49-86). London. UK: Academic Press.
132. Ohman, A. (1979). The orienting response, attention, and learning: An information-processing perspective. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Olst, & J. E. Orlebeke (Eds.), The orienting reflex in humans (pp. 443-471). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
133. Ohman, A. (1992). Orienting and attention: Preferred preattentive processing of potentially phobic stimuli. In B. A. Campbell, H. Hayne, & R. Richardson (Eds.), Attention and information processing in infants and adults: Perspectives from human and animal research (pp. 263-295). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
134. O'Toole, D., Yuille, J. C., Patrick, C. J., & Iacono, W. G. (1994). Alcohol and the physiological detection of deception: Arousal and memory influences. Psychophysiology, 31, 253-263.
135. Packer, J. S., & Siddle, D. A. T. (1989). Stimulus miscuing, electrodermal activity, and the allocation of processing resources. Psychophysiology, 26, 192-200.
136. Pennebaker, J. W., & Chew, C. H. (1985). Behavioral inhibition and electrodermal activity during deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1427-1433.
137. Podlesny, J. A. (1993). Is the guilty knowledge polygraph technique applicable in criminal investigations? A review of FBI case records. Crime Laboratory Digest, 20, 57-61.
138. Podlesny, J. A., & Raskin, D. C. (1977). Physiological measures and the detection of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 782-799.
139. Podlesny, J. A., & Raskin, D. C. (1978). Effectiveness of techniques and physiological measures in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 15, 344-359.
140. Raskin, D. C. (1982). The scientific basis of polygraph techniques and their uses in the judicial process. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in the criminal trial (pp. 311-371). Stockholm: Norsted & Soners.
141. Raskin, D. C. (1986). The polygraph in 1986: Scientific, professional, and legal issues surrounding applications and acceptance of polygraph evidence. Utah Law Review, 60, 29-74.
142. Raskin, D. C. (1989). Polygraph techniques for the detection of deception. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 317-371) New York: Springer Publishing Company.
143. Raskin, D. C., Honts, C. R., Amato, S. L., & Kircher, J. C. (1999). Update: The scientific status of research on polygraph techniques: The case for the admissibility of the results of polygraph examinations. In D. L. Faigman, D. H. Kaye, M. J. Saks, & J. Sanders (Eds.), Modern scientific evidence volume 1: The law and science of expert testimony (pp. 160-174). St. Paul, MN: West Group.
144. Raskin, D. C., Honts, C. R., & Kircher, J. C. (1997). The scientific status of research on polygraph techniques: The case for polygraph tests. In D. L. Faigman, D. H. Kaye, M. J. Saks, & J. Sanders (Eds.), Modern scientific evidence: The law and science of expert testimony (pp. 565-582). St. Paul, MN: West Group.
145. Raskin, D. C., & Podlesny, J. A. (1979). Truth and deception: A reply to Lykken. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 54-58.
146. Reid, J. E. (1947). A revised questioning technique in lie detection tests. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 37, 542-547.
147. Reid, J. E., & Inbau, F. E. (1977). Truth and deception: The polygraph ("lie detector") technique (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
148. Richardson, D. C., Carlton, B. L., & Dutton, D. W. (1990). Blind analysis of skin conductance response (SCR) recordings from a number test. Polygraph, 19, 9-20.
149. Rosenfeld, J. P., Cantwell, B., Nasman, V. T., Wojdac, V., Ivanov, S., & Mazzeiri, L. (1988). A modified event-related potential-based Guilty Knowledge Test. International Journal of Neuroscience, 42, 157-161.
150. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
151. Ruckmick, C. A. (1938). The truth about the lie detector. Journal of Applied Psychology, 22, 50-58.
152. Saxe, L. (1991a). Lying: Thoughts of an applied social psychologist. American Psychologist, 46, 409-415.
153. Saxe, L. (1991b). Science and the CQT polygraph: A theoretical critique. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26, 223-231.
154. Saxe, L., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1999). Admissibility of polygraph tests: The application of scientific standards post-Daubert. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 203-223.
155. Saxe, L., Dougherty, D., & Cross, T. P. (1985). The validity of polygraph testing: Scientific analysis and public controversy. American Psychologist, 40, 355-366.
156. Siddle, D. A. T. (1991). Orienting, habitation, and resource allocation: An associative analysis. Psychophysiology, 28, 245-259.
157. Siddle, D. A. T., & Packer, J. S. (1987). Stimulus omission and dishabituation of the electrodermal orienting response: The allocation of processing resources. Psychophysiology, 24, 181-190.
158. Siddle, D. A. T., & Spinks, J. A. (1992). Orienting, habituation, and the allocation of processing resources. In B. Campbell, R. Richardson, & H. Hayne (Eds.), Attention and information processing in infants and adults: Perspectives from human and animal research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
159. Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York: Macmillan.
160. Sokolov, E. N. (1966). Orienting reflex as information regulator. In A. Leontyev, A. Luria, & A. Smirnov (Eds.), Psychological research in U.S.S.R. (pp 334-360). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
161. Steller, M., Hanert, P., & Eiselt, W. (1987). Extraversion and the detection of information. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 334-342.
162. Stern, R. M., Breen; J. P., Watanabe, T., & Bradley, P. S. (1981). Effect of feedback on physiological information on responses to innocent associations and guilty knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 677-681.
163. Suzuki, A., Ohnishi, K., Matsuno, K., & Arasuna, M. (1979). Amplitude rank score analysis of GSR in the detection of deception: Detection rates under various examination conditions. Polygraph, 8, 242-352.
164. Suzuki, A., Watanabe, S., Ohnishi, K., Matsuno, K., & Arasuna, M. (1979). The objective analysis of GSR in the detection of deception: An analysis of GSR amplitude in terms of rank scores. Polygraph, 8, 53-63.
165. Swets, J. A., Tanner, W. P., Jr., & Birdsall, T. C. (1961). Decision processes in perception. Psychological Review, 68, 301-340.
166. Thackray, R. I., & Orne, M. T. (1968). A comparison of physiological indices in detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 4, 329-339.
167. Timm, H. W. (1982). Effect of altered outcome expectancies stemming from placebo and feedback treatments on the validity of the guilty knowledge technique. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 391-400.
168. Timm, H. W. (1987). Effect of biofeedback on the detection of deception. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 32, 736-746.
169. Timm, H. W. (1989). Methodological considerations affecting the utility of incorporating innocent subjects into the design of guilty knowledge polygraph experiments. Polygraph, 18, 143-157.
170. Van Buskirk, D., & Marcuse, F. L. (1954). The nature of errors in experimental lie detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 187-190.
171. Vincent, A., & Furedy, J. J. (1992). Electrodermal differentiation of deception: Potentially confounding and influencing factors. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 13, 129-136.
172. Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice (pp. 169-207) Chichester, England: Wiley.
173. Waid, W. M., & Orne, M. T. (1980). Individual differences in electrodermal lability and the detection of information and deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 1-8.
174. Waid, W. M., Orne, E. C., Cook, M. R., & Orne, M. T. (1978). Effects of attention, as indexed by subsequent memory; on electrodermal detection of information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 728-733.
175. Waid, W. M., Orne, E. C., Cook, M. R., & Orne, M. T. (1981). Meprobamate reduces accuracy of physiological detection of deception. Science, 212, 71-73.
176. Waid, W.M., Orne, E.C., & Orne, M.T. (1981). Selective memory for social information, alertness, and physiological arousal in the detection of deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 224-232.
177. Waid, W.M., Orne, M.T., & Wilson, S.K. (1979). Effects of level of socialization on electrodermal detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 16, 15-21.
178. Waid, W.M., Wilson, S.K., & Orne, M.T. (1981). Cross-modal physiological effects of electrodermal lability in the detection of deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1118-1125.
179. Wakamatsu, T. (1987). Effects of motivating the suspect to deceive the polygraph test. Polygraph, 16, 129-144.
180. Yamamura, T., & Miyata, Y. (1990). Development of the polygraph technique in Japan for detection of deception. Forensic Science International, 44, 257-271.