Polygraphic Examinations in Japan: Application of the Guilty Knowledge Test in Forensic Investigations

International Journal of Police Science and Management

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 16-27

  Hira, Shinji ^a   Furumitsu, Isato ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ASIA   (Japan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748110202     PISSN: 14613557     EISSN: 14781603     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/146135570200400103     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adachi K. (1995) ‘Statistical classification procedures for polygraph tests of guilty knowledge’, Behaviormetrika, Vol. 22, pp. 49–66.
2. Ben-Shakhar G. Furedy J. J. (1990) ‘Theories and applications in the detection of deception: A psychophysiological and international perspective’, Springer-Verlag, New York.
3. Christianson S.-Å. (1992) ‘Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review’, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 112, pp. 284–309.
4. Farwell L. A. Donchin E. (1991) ‘The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy (lie detection) with event-related brain potentials’, Psychophysiology, Vol. 28, pp. 531–547.
5. Fukumoto J. (1982) ‘Psychophysiological detection of deception in Japan’, Polygraph, Vol. 11, pp. 234–238.
6. Gudjonsson G. (1992) ‘The psychology of interrogations, confessions, and testimony’, Wiley, London.
7. Heuer F. Reisberg D. (1990) ‘Vivid memories of emotional events: The accuracy of remembered minutiae’, Memory and Cognition, Vol. 18, pp. 496–506.
8. Hira S. (1998) ‘Detection of deception with event-related brain potentials’, Japanese Journal of Science and Technology for Identification, Vol. 3, pp. 21–35 (in Japanese with English summary).
9. Hira S. Matsuda T. (1998) ‘Contingent negative variation (CNV) in the detection of deception task using a serial presentation of pictures’, Japanese Journal of Psychology, Vol. 69, pp. 149–155 (in Japanese with English summary).
10. Hira S. Nakata M. Matsuda T. Kakigi S. (1989) ‘Event related potential (P3 and CNV) as an index of detection of deception’, Japanese Journal of Physiological Psychology and Psychophysiology, Vol. 7, pp. 11–17 (in Japanese with English summary).
11. Hira S. Nakayama M. Kiriu M. Adachi K. (eds) (2000) ‘Lie detection: Searching for real criminals and the fragment of crime-relevant memory’, Kitaoji Shobou (in Japanese), Kyoto.
12. Iacono W. G. Lykken D. T. (1997) ‘The validity of the lie detector: Two surveys of scientific opinion’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, pp. 426–433.
13. Kircher J. C. Raskin D. C. (1988) Human versus computerized evaluations of polygraph data a laboratory setting’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 73, pp. 291–302.
14. Kircher J. C. Raskin D. C. (1992) ‘Polygraph techniques: History, controversies, and prospects’, in Suedfeld P. Tetlock P. E. (eds) ‘Psychology and social policy’, Hemisphere, New York, pp. 295–307.
15. Kiriu M. (1991) ‘Evaluation of question contents and memory of the critical question in detection of deception’, Reports of National Research Institute of Police Science: Research on Forensic Science, Vol. 44, pp. 67–72 (in Japanese with English summary).
16. Kuramochi T. Kiriu M. Nakayama M. Yokoi Y Ohama T. Okazaki I. (1999) A survey of know-how about forming GKT questions', Japanese Journal of Science and Technology for Identification, Vol. 4, p. A39 (in Japanese).
17. Lykken D. T. (1998) ‘A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector’, Plenum Trade, New York.
18. Miyake Y. Mizutani M. Yamamura T. (1993) ‘Event-related potentials as an indicator of detecting information in field polygraph examinations’, Polygraph, Vol. 22, pp. 131–149.
19. Miyake Y. Okita T. Konishi K. Matsunaga I. (1986) ‘Event-related brain potentials as an index of detection of deception’, Reports of National Research Institute of Police Science: Research on Forensic Science, Vol. 39, pp. 132–138 (in Japanese with English summary).
20. Miyake Y. Okita T. Konishi K. (1987) ‘Effect of self-relevancy of stimuli of event-related brain potentials as an index of detection of deception’, Reports of National Research Institute of Police Science: Research on Forensic Science, Vol. 40, pp. 90–94 (in Japanese with English summary).
21. Nagano T. Miyake B. (1996) The present situation of forensic sciences of police in Japan and the National Research Institute of Police Science’, Forensic Science International, Vol. 80, pp. 11–22.
22. Neshige R. Kuroda Y. Kakigi R. Fujiyama F. Matoba R. Yarita M. Lüders H. Shibasaki H. (1991) ‘Event-related brain potentials as indicators of visual recognition and detection of criminals by their use’, Forensic Science International, Vol. 51, pp. 95–103.
23. Nunnally J. C. (1978) ‘Psychometric theory’, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.
24. Okuno T. Yagi A. (1998) ‘Influence of mismatch between subjects' representation on the detection accuracy of deception’, Japanese Journal of Science and Technology for Identification, Vol. 3, pp. 1–9 (in Japanese with English summary).
25. Podlesny J. A. (1993) ‘Is the guilty knowledge polygraph technique applicable in criminal investigations? A review of FBI case records’, Criminal Laboratory Digest, Vol. 20, pp. 57–61.
26. Reid J. Inbau F. E. (1977) ‘Truth and deception: The polygraph (lie detection) technique’, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
27. Seta S. (1996) ‘Current research and case work activities of criminalistics in Japan’, Forensic Science International, Vol. 80, pp. 109–135.
28. Sugawa K. Ishikawa M. (1998) ‘The field studies on the possibility of polygraphic examination using presentation software’, Japanese Journal of Science and Technology for Identification, Vol. 3, p. A40 (in Japanese).
29. Tokuda Y. (1993) ‘An approach to practical use of an automated diagnostic system for polygraph test’, Reports of National Research Institute of Police Science: Research on Forensic Science, Vol. 46, pp. 2–26 (in Japanese).
30. Yamamura T. Miyata Y. (1990) ‘Development of the polygraph technique in Japan for detection of deception’, Forensic Science International, Vol. 44, pp. 257–271.