Comparative effects of nano elemental selenium and sodium selenite on selenium retention in broiler chickens

Animal Feed Science and Technology

Volumn 177, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 204-210

  Hu, C H ^a   Li, Y L ^a   Xiong, L ^a   Zhang, H M ^a   Song, J ^a   Xia, M S ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Chick; Nano elemental selenium; Selenium retention; Sodium selenite

Indexed keywords

GALLUS GALLUS; GLYCINE MAX; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84867227072     PISSN: 03778401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alaejow M.S., Romero C.D. Urinary selenium concentrations. Clin. Chem. 1993, 39:2040-2052.
2. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis 1995, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA. 16th ed.
3. Chithrani B.D., Chan W.C.W. Elucidating the mechanism of cellular uptake and removal of protein-coated gold nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes. Nano Lett. 2007, 7:1542-1550.
4. Davda J., Labhasetwar V. Characterization of nanoparticle uptake by endothelial cells. Int. J. Pharm. 2002, 233:51-59.
5. Feed Database in China Table of Feed Composition and Nutritive Value in China 2009, China Feed. 2009 ed.
6. Florance A.T., Hillery A.M., Hussain N., Jani P.U. Nanoparticles as carriers for oral peptide absorption: studies on particle uptake and fate. J. Control. Release 1995, 36:39-46.
7. Gao X.Y., Hiroshi M. Peptide-based nanotubes and their applications in bionanotechnology. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17:2037-2050.
8. Gao X.Y., Zhang J.S., Zhang L.D. Hollow sphere selenium nanoparticles: their in vitro anti hydroxyl radical effect. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14:290-293.
9. Hall J.A., Harwell A.M., Van Saun R.J., Vorachek W.R., Stewart W.C., Galbraith M.L., Hooper K.J., Hunter J.K., Mosher W.D., Pirelli G.J. Agronomic biofortification with selenium: Effects on whole blood selenium and humoral immunity in beef cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 164:184-190.
10. 75Se-labeled sodium selenite and selenomethionine in chicks: effects of time segment selenium concentration and method of measurement. J. Nutr. 1986, 116:142-148.
11. Jia X., Li N., Chen J. A subchronic toxicity study of elemental Nano-Se in Sprague-Dawley rats. Life Sci. 2005, 76:1989-2003.
12. Kim Y.Y., Mahan D.C. Comparative effects of high dietary levels of organic and inorganic selenium on selenium toxicity of growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 79:942-948.
13. Kim Y.Y., Mahan D.C. Biological aspects of selenium in farm animals. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 16:435-444.
14. 75Se labeled rats. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 1997, 78:20-30.
15. Liao C.D., Hung W.L., Jan K.C., Yeh A.I., Ho C.T., Hwang L.S. Nano/sub-microsized lignan glycosides from sesame meal exhibit higher transport and absorption efficiency in Caco-2 cell monolayer. Food Chem. 2010, 119:896-902.
16. Mahan D.C., Cline T.R., Richert B. Effects of dietary levels of selenium-enriched yeast and sodium selenite as selenium sources fed to growing-finishing pigs on performance, tissue selenium, serum glutathione peroxidase activity, carcass characteristics, and loin quality. J. Anim. Sci. 1999, 77:2172-2179.
17. McConnell K.P., Cho G.J. Transmucosal movement of selenium. Am. J. Physiol. 1965, 208:1191-1195.
18. 75Se-selenite by brush border membrane vesicles from chick duodenum stimulated by vitamin D. J. Nutr. 1989, 119:242-247.
19. National Research Council Nutrient Requirements of Poultry 1994, Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC. 9th rev. ed.
20. Payne R.L., Southern L.L. Comparison of inorganic and organic selenium sources for broilers. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84:898-902.
21. SAS SAS User's Guide (Release 6.12 ed.) 1996, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
22. Shi L.G., Xun W.J., Yue W.B., Zhang C.X., Ren Y.S., Shi L., Wang Q., Yang R.J., Lei F.L. Effect of sodium selenite, Se-yeast and nano-elemental selenium on growth performance Se concentration and antioxidant status in growing male goats. Small Ruminant Res. 2011, 96:49-52.
23. Wang H.L., Zhang J.S., Yu H.Q. Elemental selenium at nano size possesses lower toxicity without compromising the fundamental effect on selenoenzymes: comparison with selenomethionine in mice. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2007, 42:1524-1533.
24. Wang Y.B., Xu B.H. Effect of different selenium source (sodium selenite and selenium yeast) on broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008, 144:306-314.
25. Wolffram S., Anliker E., Scharrer E. Uptake of selenate and selenite by isolated intestinal brush-border membrae vesicles from pig, sheep, and rat. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 1986, 10:293-306.
26. Yoon I., Werner T.M., Butler J.M. Effect of source and concentration of selenium on growth performance and selenium retention in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2007, 86:727-730.
27. Zha L.Y., Xu Z.R., Wang M.Q., Gu L.Y. Chromium nanoparticle exhibits higher absorption efficiency than chromium picolinate and chromium chloride in Caco-2 cell monolayers. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2008, 92:131-140.
28. Zhan X.A., Wang M., Zhao R.Q., Li W.F., Xu Z.R. Effects of different selenium source on selenium distribution, loin quality and antioxidant status in finishing pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 132:202-211.
29. Zhang J.S., Gao X.Y., Zhang L.D., Bao Y.P. Biological effects of a nano red elemental selenium. Biofactors 2001, 15:27-38.
30. Zhang J.S., Wang H., Yan X., Zhang L.D. Comparison of short-term toxicity between Nano-Se and selenite in mice. Life Sci. 2005, 76:1099-1109.
31. Zhou X., Wang Y. Influence of dietary nano elemental selenium on growth performance, tissue selenium distribution, meat quality, and glutathione peroxidase activity in Guangxi Yellow chicken. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90:680-686.