DNA repair pathway choice is influenced by the health of Drosophila melanogaster

Genetics

Volumn 192, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 361-370

  Wang, Alethea D ^a   Agrawal, Aneil F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ARTICLE; CELL FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPAIR; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FITNESS; GENE MUTATION; LARVA; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; DIET; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA DAMAGE; DNA END-JOINING REPAIR; DNA LIGASES; DNA REPAIR; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MUTATION; MUTATION RATE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 84867164485     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.143321     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Agrawal, A. F., 2001 Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction. Nature 411: 692-695.
2. Agrawal, A. F., 2002 Genetic loads under fitness-dependent mutation rates. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 1004-1010.
3. Agrawal, A. F., and A. D. Wang, 2008 Increased transmission of mutations by low-condition females: evidence for conditiondependent DNA repair. PLoS Biol. 6: e30.
4. Ashburner, M., K. G. Golic, and R. S. Hawley, 2005 Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
5. Aylon, Y., B. Liefshitz, and M. Kupiec, 2004 The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 23: 4868-4875.
6. Baer, C. F., M. M. Miyamoto, and D. R. Denver, 2007 Mutation rate variation in multicellular eukaryotes: causes and consequences. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8: 619-631.
7. Barton, N. H., and M. Turelli, 1989 Evolutionary quantitative genetics: How little do we know? Annu. Rev. Genet. 23: 337-370.
8. Bessman, M. J., N. Muzyczka, M. F. Goodman, and R. L. Schnaar, 1974 Studies on the biochemical basis of spontaneous mutation. II. The incorporation of a base and its analogue into DNA by wild-type, mutator and antimutator DNA polymerases. J. Mol. Biol. 88: 409-421.
9. Britten, R. J., 1986 Rates of DNA sequence evolution differ between taxonomic groups. Science 231: 1393-1398.
10. Bulmer, M., 1989 Estimating the variability of substitution rates. Genetics 123: 615-619.
11. Chan, Y. S., D. A. Naujoks, D. S. Huen, and S. Russell, 2011 Insect population control by homing endonuclease-based gene drive: an evaluation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 188: 33-44.
12. Clayton, L. K., M. F. Goodman, E. W. Branscomb, and D. J. Galas, 1979 Error induction and correction by mutant and wild type T4 DNA polymerases. Kinetic error discrimination mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 254: 1902-1912.
13. Crow, J. F., 1997 The high spontaneous mutation rate: Is it a health risk? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 8380-8386.
14. David, P., T. Bjorksten, K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski, 2000 Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature 406: 186-188.
15. Echols, H., 1981 SOS functions, cancer and inducible evolution. Cell 25: 1-2.
16. Eisen, J. A., and P. C. Hanawalt, 1999 A phylogenomic study of DNA repair genes, proteins, and processes. Mutat. Res. 435: 171-213.
17. Engels, W. R., D. Johnson-Schlitz, C. Flores, L. White, and C. R. Preston, 2007 A third link connecting aging with double strand break repair. Cell Cycle 6: 131-135.
18. Fishman-Lobell, J., N. Rudin, and J. E. Haber, 1992 Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair that are kinetically separable and independently modulated. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12: 1292-1303.
19. Haldane, J. B. S., 1937 The effect of variation of fitness. Am. Nat. 71: 337-349.
20. Houle, D., 1991 Genetic covariance of fitness correlates: what genetic correlations are made of and why it matters. Evolution 45: 630-648.
21. Hunt, J., R. Brooks, M. D. Jennions, M. J. Smith, C. L. Bentsen et al., 2004 High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature 432: 1024-1027.
22. Jackson, S. P., 2002 Sensing and repairing DNA double-strand breaks. Carcinogenesis 23: 687-696.
23. Jenkins, K., D. Hawley, C. Farabaugh, and D. Cristol, 2001 Ptilochronology reveals differences in condition of captive White-throated Sparrows. Condor 103: 579-586.
24. Kanaar, R., J. H. Hoeijmakers, and D. C. van Gent, 1998 Molecular mechanisms of DNA double strand break repair. Trends Cell Biol. 8: 483-489.
25. Keightley, P. D., and M. Lynch, 2003 Toward a realistic model of mutations affecting fitness. Evolution 57: 683-689.
26. Keightley, P. D., and S. P. Otto, 2006 Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations. Nature 443: 89-92.
27. Kimura, M., 1967 On evolutionary adjustment of spontaneous mutation rates. Genet. Res. 9: 23-34.
28. Kirkwood, T. B. L., R. F. Rosenberger, and D. J. Galas, 1986 Accuracy in Molecular Processes: Its Control and Relevance to Living Systems. Chapman & Hall, London.
29. Kondrashov, A. S., 1988 Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature 336: 435-440.
30. Kondrashov, A. S., 1995 Contamination of the genome by very slightly deleterious mutations: Why have we not died 100 times over? J. Theor. Biol. 175: 583-594.
31. Lande, R., 1994 Risk of population extinction from fixation of new deleterious mutations. Evolution 48: 1460-1469.
32. Langerak, P., and P. Russell, 2011 Regulatory networks integrating cell cycle control with DNA damage checkpoints and doublestrand break repair. Proc. Biol. Sci. 366: 3562-3571.
33. Leigh, E. Jr., 1970 Natural selection and mutability. Am. Nat. 104: 301-305.
34. Lieber, M. R., 2010 The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79: 181-211.
35. Lynch, M., 2008 The cellular, developmental and populationgenetic determinants of mutation-rate evolution. Genetics 180: 933-943.
36. Lynch, M., J. Conery, and R. Burger, 1995 Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am. Nat. 146: 489-518.
37. Lynch, M., J. Blanchard, D. Houle, T. Kibota, S. Schultz et al., 1999 Perspective: spontaneous deleterious mutation. Evolution 53: 645-663.
38. Mao, Z., M. Bozzella, A. Seluanov, and V. Gorbunova, 2008 Comparison of nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination in human cells. DNA Repair (Amst.) 7: 1765-1771.
39. Moore, J. K., and J. E. Haber, 1996 Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 2164-2173.
40. Morgan, T. H., 1903 Evolution and Adaptation. Macmillan, New York.
41. Nasmyth, K., 1996 Viewpoint: putting the cell cycle in order. Science 274: 1643-1645.
42. Ohnishi, T., E. Mori, and A. Takahashi, 2009 DNA double-strand breaks: their production, recognition, and repair in eukaryotes. Mutat. Res. 669: 8-12.
43. Partridge, L., and N. H. Barton, 1993 Optimality, mutation and the evolution of aging. Nature 362: 305-311.
44. Perry, J. C., and L. Rowe, 2010 Condition-dependent ejaculate size and composition in a ladybird beetle. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 277: 3639-3647.
45. Preston, C. R., W. Engels, and C. Flores, 2002 Efficient repair of DNA breaks in Drosophila: evidence for single-strand annealing and competition with other repair pathways. Genetics 161: 711-720.
46. Preston, C. R., C. C. Flores, and W. R. Engels, 2006a Differential usage of alternative pathways of double-strand break repair in Drosophila. Genetics 172: 1055-1068.
47. Preston, C. R., C. C. Flores, and W. R. Engels, 2006b Age-dependent usage of double-strand-break repair pathways. Curr. Biol. 16: 2009-2015.
48. R Development Core Team, 2012 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
49. Reitzel, A. M., 2004 Growth, development and condition of Dendraster excentricus (Eschscholtz) larvae reared on natural and laboratory diets. J. Plankton Res. 26: 901-908.
50. Rowe, L., and D. Houle, 1996 The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. Biol. Sci. 263: 1415-1421.
51. Saleh-Gohari, N., and T. Helleday, 2004 Conservative homologous recombination preferentially repairs DNA double-strand breaks in the S phase of the cell cycle in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: 3683-3688.
52. Seluanov, A., D. Mittelman, O. M. Pereira-Smith, J. H. Wilson, and V. Gorbunova, 2004 DNA end joining becomes less efficient and more error-prone during cellular senescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 7624-7629.
53. Sharp, N. P., and A. F. Agrawal, 2012 Evidence for elevated mutation rates in low-quality genotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 6142-6146.
54. Shaw, F. H., and C. F. Baer, 2011 Fitness-dependent mutation rates in finite populations. J. Evol. Biol. 24: 1677-1684.
55. Sniegowski, P. D., P. J. Gerrish, T. Johnson, and A. Shaver, 2000 The evolution of mutation rates: separating causes from consequences. Bioessays 22: 1057-1066.
56. Tomkins, J. L., J. Radwan, J. S. Kotiaho, and T. Tregenza, 2004 Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 323-328.
57. Van Noordwijk, A., and G. de Jong, 1986 Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life-history tactics. Am. Nat. 128: 137-142.
58. Wallenfang, M. R., R. Nayak, and S. DiNardo, 2006 Dynamics of the male germline stem cell population during aging of Drosophila melanogaster. Aging Cell 5: 297-304.
59. Wong, C., and D. L. Jones, 2012 Efficiency of spermatogonial dedifferentiation during aging. PLoS ONE 7: e33635.