Information-theoretical learning of discriminative clusters for unsupervised domain adaptation

Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2012

Volumn 2, Issue , 2012, Pages 1079-1086

  Shi, Yuan ^a   Sha, Fei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; DOMAIN ADAPTATION; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; FEATURE SPACE; GRADIENT-BASED METHOD; HYPERPARAMETERS; LABELED DATA; MISCLASSIFICATION ERROR; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; TARGET DOMAIN;

LEARNING SYSTEMS; OBJECT RECOGNITION; OPTIMIZATION;

INFORMATION THEORY;

EID: 84867124651     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., and Van Gool, L. SURF: Speeded up robust features. ECCV, 2006.
2. Ben-David, S., Blitzer, J., Crammer, K., and Pereira, F. Analysis of representations for domain adaptation. NIPS, 2007.
3. Bickel, S., Brückner, M., and Scheffer, T. Discriminative learning for differing training and test distributions. In Prof. of ICML, pp. 81-88, 2007.
4. Blitzer, J., McDonald, R., and Pereira, F. Domain adaptation with structural correspondence learning. In Proc. of EMNLP, pp. 120-128. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006.
5. Blitzer, J., Dredze, M., and Pereira, F. Biographies, bollywood, boom-boxes and blenders: Domain adaptation for sentiment classification. In Proc. of ACL, 2007.
6. Chapelle, O., Schölkopf, B., Zien, A., et al. Semi-supervised learning, volume 2. MIT press Cambridge, MA:, 2006.
7. Daumé III, H. and Marcu, D. Domain adaptation for statistical classifiers. JAIR, 26:101-126, 2006.
8. Dhillon, I.S., Mallela, S., and Modha, D.S. Information-theoretic co-clustering. In Proc. of SIGKDD, 2003.
9. Fisher III, J.W. and Principe, J.C. A methodology for information theoretic feature extraction. In Proc. IEEE World Congress on Comp. Intell., 1998.
10. Glorot, X., Bordes, A., and Bengio, Y. Domain adaptation for large-scale sentiment classification: A deep learning approach. In Proc. of ICML, 2011.
11. Goldberger, J., Roweis, S., Hinton, G., and Salakhutdinov, R. Neighbourhood components analysis. NIPS, 2004.
12. Gomes, R., Krause, A., and Perona, P. Discriminative clustering by regularized information maximization. In NIP, 2010.
13. Gopalan, R., Li, R., and Chellappa, R. Domain adaptation for object recognition: An unsupervised approach. In Proc. of ICCV, 2011.
14. Grandvalet, Y. and Bengio, Y. Semi-supervised learning by entropy minimization. NIPS, 17:529-236, 2005.
15. Griffin, G., Holub, A., and Perona, P. Caltech-256 object category dataset. Technical report, California Institute of Technology, 2007.
16. Hinton, G. and Roweis, S.T. Stochastic neighbor embedding. Advances in neural information processing systems, 15:833-840, 2002.
17. Huang, J., Smola, A.J., Gretton, A., Borgwardt, K.M., and Scholkopf, B. Correcting sample selection bias by unlabeled data. NIPS, 19:601, 2007.
18. Kulis, B., Saenko, K., and Darrell, T. What you saw is not what you get: Domain adaptation using asymmetric kernel transforms. In Proc. of CVPR, 2011.
19. Mansour, Y., Mohri, M., and Rostamizadeh, A. Domain adaptation: Learning bounds and algorithms. Proc. of COLT, 2009.
20. Pan, S.J. and Yang, Q. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. Engi., 22(10):1345-1359, 2010.
21. Pan, S.J., Tsang, I.W., Kwok, J.T., and Yang, Q. Domain adaptation via transfer component analysis. IEEE Trans. Neur. Nets., 22(2):199, 2011.
22. Quiñonero-Candela, J., Sugiyama, M., and Schwaighofer, A. Dataset Shift in Machine Learning. The MIT Press, 2009.
23. Rastrow, A., Jelinek, F., Sethy, A., and Ramabhadran, B. Unsupervised model adaptation using information-theoretic criterion. In Proc. HLT-NAACL, 2010.
24. Saenko, K., Kulis, B., Fritz, M., and Darrell, T. Adapting visual category models to new domains. In Proc. of ECCV, 2010.
25. Shimodaira, H. Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function. J. of Stat. Plan. and Infer., 90(2):227-244, 2000.
26. Weinberger, K.Q. and Saul, L.K. Distance metric learning for large margin nearest neighbor classification. JMLR, 10:207-244, 2009.